Articles | Volume 49
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-9-2019
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-9-2019
06 Aug 2019
 | 06 Aug 2019

Boundary condition control on inter-aquifer flow in the subsurface of Berlin (Germany) – new insights from 3-D numerical modelling

Maximilian Frick, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, Mauro Cacace, and Michael Schneider

Related authors

PyMeshIt: An open-source geological solid modeling and tetrahedral meshing engine integrated in PZero
Waqas Hussain, Mauro Cacace, Andrea Bistacchi, and Riccardo Monti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4815,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-4815, 2026
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Solid Earth (SE).
Short summary
Hybrid implicit–explicit XFEM simulation of injection-induced seismicity: resolving multi-scale rupture nucleation and dynamics
Mohammad Sabah, Mauro Cacace, Inga Berre, Iman R. Kivi, and Hannes Hofmann
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1658,https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2026-1658, 2026
Short summary
Influence of groundwater recharge projections on climate-driven subsurface warming: insights from numerical modeling
Mikhail Tsypin, Viet Dung Nguyen, Mauro Cacace, Guido Blöcher, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, Elco Luijendijk, and Charlotte Krawczyk
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 30, 1647–1673, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1647-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-30-1647-2026, 2026
Short summary
Towards fully coupled Thermo-Hydro-Mechanical-Chemical (THMC) modelling in advanced reservoir engineering: GOLEM-PHREEQC
Marco De Lucia, Samuele Frigo, Max Lübke, Mauro Cacace, Elena Petrova, Hannes Hofmann, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Guido Blöcher
Adv. Geosci., 67, 117–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-67-117-2026,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-67-117-2026, 2026
Short summary
Exploiting physics-based machine learning to quantify geodynamic effects – insights from the Alpine region
Denise Degen, Ajay Kumar, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 18, 9219–9236, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9219-2025,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-18-9219-2025, 2025
Short summary

Cited articles

Bayer, U., Scheck, M., and Koehler, M.: Modeling of the 3D Thermal Field in the Northeast German Basin, Geol. Rundsch., 86, 241–251, 1997. a
Das, B. M.: Advanced Soil Mechanics, 4th Edn., CRC Press, London, UK, 2013. a
Devlin, J.: HydrogeoSieveXL: An Excel-Based Tool to Estimate Hydraulic Conductivity from Grain-Size Analysis, Hydrogeol. J., 23, 837–844, 2015. a
Devlin, J. F.: Reply to Comment on “HydrogeoSieveXL: An Excel-Based Tool to Estimate Hydraulic Conductivity from Grain-Size Analysis”: Technical Note Published in Hydrogeology Journal (2015) 23: 837–844, by J. F. Devlin, Hydrogeol. J., 25, 593–596, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1510-z, 2017. a
Diersch, H.-J.: FEFLOW: Finite Element Modeling of Flow, Mass and Heat Transport in Porous and Fractured Media, Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, 2013. a, b
Download
Short summary
The study presented in this paper aims at reproducing findings from chemical and isotopic groundwater sample analysis along with quantifying the influence of regional (cross-boundary) flow for the area of Berlin, Germany. For this purpose we built 3-D models of the subsurface, populating them with material parameters (e.g. porosity, permeability) and solving them for coupled fluid and heat transport. Special focus was given to the setup of boundary conditions, i.e. fixed pressure at the sides.
Share