Articles | Volume 45
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-209-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-209-2018
28 Aug 2018
 | 28 Aug 2018

Modelling of multi-lateral well geometries for geothermal applications

Elisabeth Peters, Guido Blöcher, Saeed Salimzadeh, Paul J. P. Egberts, and Mauro Cacace

Related authors

Physics-based numerical evaluation of High-Temperature Aquifer Thermal Energy Storage (HT-ATES) in the Upper Jurassic reservoir of the German Molasse Basin
Kalliopi Tzoufka, Guido Blöcher, Mauro Cacace, Daniela Pfrang, and Kai Zosseder
Adv. Geosci., 65, 103–111, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-103-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-103-2024, 2024
Short summary
Characterization of artesian flow and heat transition in an ATES research wellbore using DTS monitoring and numerical modelling
Liang Pei, Lioba Virchow, Guido Blöcher, Stefan Kranz, and Ali Saadat
Adv. Geosci., 65, 37–44, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-37-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-65-37-2024, 2024
Short summary
Thermal structure of the southern Caribbean and northwestern South America: implications for seismogenesis
Ángela María Gómez-García, Álvaro González, Mauro Cacace, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Gaspar Monsalve
Solid Earth, 15, 281–303, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-281-2024,https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-281-2024, 2024
Short summary
How biased are our models? – a case study of the alpine region
Denise Degen, Cameron Spooner, Magdalena Scheck-Wenderoth, and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 7133–7153, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-7133-2021, 2021
Short summary
Effects of transient processes for thermal simulations of the Central European Basin
Denise Degen and Mauro Cacace
Geosci. Model Dev., 14, 1699–1719, https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1699-2021,https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-14-1699-2021, 2021
Short summary

Cited articles

Blöcher, M. G., Zimmermann, G., Moeck, I., Brandt, W., Hassanzadegan, A., and Magri F.: 3D numerical modeling of hydrothermal processes during the lifetime of a deep geothermal reservoir, Geofluids, 10, 406–421, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8123.2010.00284.x, 2010. 
Blöcher, G., Cacace, M., Reinsch, T., and Watanabe, N.: Evaluation of three exploitation concepts for a deep geothermal system in the North German Basin, Comp. Geosci., 82, 120–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2015.06.005, 2015. 
Cacace, M. and Jacquey, A. B.: Flexible parallel implicit modelling of coupled thermal-hydraulic-mechanical processes in fractured rocks, Solid Earth, 8, 921–941, doi10.5194/se-8-921-2017, 2017. 
Egberts, P. J. P. and Peters, E.:A Fast Simulation Tool for Evaluation of Novel Well Stimulation Techniques for Tight Gas Reservoirs, Society of Petroleum Engineers, https://doi.org/10.2118/174289-MS, 2015. 
Download
Short summary
Accuracy of well inflow modelling in different numerical simulation approaches was compared for a multi-lateral well with laterals of varying diameter. For homogeneous cases, all simulators generally were reasonably close in terms of the total well flow (deviations smaller than 4 %). The distribution of the flow over the different laterals in a well can vary significantly between simulators (> 20 %). In a heterogeneous case with a fault the deviations between the approaches were much larger.