Athanasiou, E., Tsourlos, P., Papazachos, C. B., and Tsokas, G.: Optimizing
electrical resistivity array configurations by using a method based on the
sensitivity ma
trix, in: Near Surface 2009-15th EAGE European Meeting of
Environmental and Engineering Geophysics, Dublin, Ireland, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, Houton, the Netherlands,
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20147025, 2009.
a
Bui, M., Adjiman, C. S., Bardow, A., Anthony, E. J., Boston, A., Brown, S.,
Fennell, P. S., Fuss, S., Galindo, A., Hackett, L. A., Hallett, J. P.,
Herzog, H. J., Jackson, G., Kemper, J., Krevor, S., Maitland, G. C.,
Matuszewski, M., Metcalfe, I. S., Petit, C., Puxty, G., Reimer, J., Reiner,
D. M., Rubin, E. S., Scott, S. A., Shah, N., Smit, B., Trusler, J. P. M.,
Webley, P., Wilcox, J., and Dowell, N. M.: Carbon capture and storage
(CCS): the way forward, Energ. Environ. Sci., 11, 1062–1176,
https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ee02342a, 2018.
a
Coscia, I., Marescot, L., Maurer, H., Greenhalgh, S., and Linde, N.:
Experimental Design for Crosshole Electrical Resistivity Tomography Data
Sets, in: Near Surface 2008 – 14th EAGE European Meeting of Environmental
and Engineering Geophysics, European Association of Geoscientists &
Engineers,
https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.20146277, 2008.
a
Eliasson, P., Romdhane, A., Jordan, M., and Querendez, E.: A synthetic
Sleipner study of
CO2 quantification using controlled
source electro-magnetics and full waveform inversion, Enrgy. Proced., 63,
4249–4263, 2014. a
Geuzaine, C. and Remacle, J.-F.: Gmsh: A 3-D finite element mesh generator with
built-in pre- and post-processing facilities, Int. J.
Numer. Meth. Eng., 79, 1309–1331,
https://doi.org/10.1002/nme.2579,
2009.
a
Greenberg, M. L. and Castagna, J. P.: Shear-wave velocity estimation in porous
rocks; Theoretical formulation, preliminary verification and
applicationsShear-wave velocity estimation in porous rocks; Theoretical
formulation, preliminary verification and applications, Geophys. Prospect.,
40, 195–209,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2478.1992.tb00371.x, 1992.
a
Grimstad, A.-A., Sundal, A., Hagby, K. F., and Ringstad, C.: Modelling
Medium-Depth
CO2 Injection at the Svelvik
CO2 Field Laboratory in Norway, in: 14th Greenhouse Gas
Control Technologies Conference Melbourne, 21–26 October 2018 (GHGT-14), 2018.
a,
b
Günther, T., Rücker, C., and Spitzer, K.: Three-dimensional modelling and
inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – II. Inversion,
Geophys. J. Int., 166, 506–517,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03011.x,
2006.
a
Hennig, T., Weller, A., and Möller, M.: Object orientated focussing of
geoelectrical multielectrode measurements, J. Appl. Geophys., 65,
57–64,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.04.007, 2008.
a,
b
Loke, M. H., Wilkinson, P. B., Uhlemann, S. S., Chambers, J. E., and Oxby, L. S.: Computation of optimized arrays for 3-D electrical imaging surveys,
Geophys. J. Int., 199, 1751–1764,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu357, 2014.
a
Mavko, G., Mukerji, T., and Dvorkin, J.: The Rock Physics Handbook, Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge, England,
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511626753, 2009.
a,
b
Ringstad, C., Eliasson, P., Jordan, M., and Grimstad, A.-A.: Re-Vitalization
and Upgrade of the Svelvik
CO2 Field Laboratory in Norway,
in: 14th Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies Conference Melbourne, 21–26
October 2018 (GHGT-14), 2019. a
Rücker, C., Günther, T., and Spitzer, K.: Three-dimensional modelling
and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography – I. Modelling,
Geophys. J. Int., 166, 495–505,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03010.x, 2006.
a
Rücker, C., Günther, T., and Wagner, F. M.: pyGIMLi: An open-source library
for modelling and inversion in geophysics, Comput. Geosci., 109, 106–123,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2017.07.011,
2017.
a
Schlumberger: Eclipse 2015.2 Industry-Reference Reservoir Simulator, Technical
description, Tech. rep., Schlumberger, Houston, Texas, 2015. a
Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., Bergmann, P., Labitzke, T., Wagner, F., and Rippe,
D.: Permanent crosshole electrical resistivity tomography (ERT) as an
established method for the long-term
CO2 monitoring at the
Ketzin pilot site, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 52, 432–448,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.07.024, 2016.
a
Stummer, P., Maurer, H., and Green, A. G.: Experimental design: Electrical
resistivity data sets that provide optimum subsurface information,
Geophysics, 69, 120–139,
https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1649381, 2004.
a
Telford, W. M., Geldart, L. P., and Sheriff, R. E.: Applied Geophysics,
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England,
https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139167932, 1990.
a
Uhlemann, S., Wilkinson, P. B., Maurer, H., Wagner, F. M., Johnson, T. C., and
Chambers, J. E.: Optimized survey design for electrical resistivity
tomography: combined optimization of measurement configuration and electrode
placement, Geophys. J. Int., 214, 108–121,
https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggy128,
2018.
a
Wagner, F. M., Günther, T., Schmidt-Hattenberger, C., and Maurer, H.:
Constructive optimization of electrode locations for target-focused
resistivity monitoring, Geophysics, 80, E29–E40,
https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2014-0214.1, 2015.
a
Wiese, B., Weinzierl, W., Pilz, P., Raab, T., and Schmidt-Hattenberger, C.: Tiny diameter downhole pressure monitoring, EGU General Assembly 2020, Online, 4–8 May 2020, EGU2020-5584,
https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu2020-5584, 2020.
a
Wilkinson, P. B., Meldrum, P. I., Chambers, J. E., Kuras, O., and Ogilvy, R. D.: Improved strategies for the automatic selection of optimized sets of electrical resistivity tomography measurement configurations, Geophys. J. Int., 167, 1119–1126,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03196.x, 2006.
a
Wilkinson, P. B., Loke, M. H., Meldrum, P. I., Chambers, J. E., Kuras, O.,
Gunn, D. A., and Ogilvy, R. D.: Practical aspects of applied optimized survey
design for electrical resistivity tomography, Geophys. J. Int., 189,
428–440,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05372.x, 2012.
a
Wuestefeld, A. and Weinzierl, W.: Design considerations for using Distributed
Accoustic Sensing for cross-well seismics: A case study for
CO2 storage, Geophys. Prospect., 68, 1893–1905,
https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2478.12965, 2020.
a
Yang, X., Chen, X., Carrigan, C. R., and Ramirez, A. L.: Uncertainty
quantification of
CO2 saturation estimated from electrical
resistance tomography data at the Cranfield site, Int. J. Greenh. Gas
Con., 27, 59–68,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2014.05.006, 2014.
a
Zhou, B.: Electrical Resistivity Tomography: A Subsurface-Imaging Technique,
in: Applied Geophysics with Case Studies on Environmental, Exploration and
Engineering Geophysics, IntechOpen,
https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.81511, 2019.
a
