13 Mar 2017
AlpArray-Italy: Site description and noise characterization
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Luciana Bonatto
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Marco Capello
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via della Faggiola, 32, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Adriano Cavaliere
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Donato Creti, 12, 40128, Bologna, Italy
Claudio Chiarabba
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Ezio D'Alema
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Bassini 15, 20133, Milano, Italy
Stefania Danesi
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Donato Creti, 12, 40128, Bologna, Italy
Sara Lovati
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Bassini 15, 20133, Milano, Italy
Lucia Margheriti
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Marco Massa
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Bassini 15, 20133, Milano, Italy
Salvatore Mazza
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Francesco Mazzarini
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via della Faggiola, 32, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Stephen Monna
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Milena Moretti
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Anna Nardi
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Davide Piccinini
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via della Faggiola, 32, 56126, Pisa, Italy
Claudia Piromallo
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Silvia Pondrelli
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Donato Creti, 12, 40128, Bologna, Italy
Simone Salimbeni
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Donato Creti, 12, 40128, Bologna, Italy
Enrico Serpelloni
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Donato Creti, 12, 40128, Bologna, Italy
Stefano Solarino
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Massimiliano Vallocchia
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia, Via di Vigna Murata, 605, Rome, Italy
Marco Santulin
Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, Via Bassini 15, 20133, Milano, Italy
the AlpArray Working Group
A full list of authors and their affiliations appears at the end of the paper.
Related authors
Konstantinos Michailos, György Hetényi, Matteo Scarponi, Josip Stipčević, Irene Bianchi, Luciana Bonatto, Wojciech Czuba, Massimo Di Bona, Aladino Govoni, Katrin Hannemann, Tomasz Janik, Dániel Kalmár, Rainer Kind, Frederik Link, Francesco Pio Lucente, Stephen Monna, Caterina Montuori, Stefan Mroczek, Anne Paul, Claudia Piromallo, Jaroslava Plomerová, Julia Rewers, Simone Salimbeni, Frederik Tilmann, Piotr Środa, Jérôme Vergne, and the AlpArray-PACASE Working Group
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2117–2138, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the spatial variability of the crustal thickness beneath the broader European Alpine region by using teleseismic earthquake information (receiver functions) on a large amount of seismic waveform data. We compile a new Moho depth map of the broader European Alps and make our results freely available. We anticipate that our results can potentially provide helpful hints for interdisciplinary imaging and numerical modeling studies.
A. Govoni, L. Margheriti, M. Moretti, V. Lauciani, G. Sensale, A. Bucci, and F. Criscuoli
Adv. Geosci., 41, 35–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-41-35-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-41-35-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We designed, setup and tested on the field an 'easy to deploy' temporary UMTS real-time seismic network resolving or minimizing the main drawbacks: Internet security, signal and service availability, power consumption.Overall this solution has proved to be a very cost effective approach with real-time data acquisition rates usually greater than 97% and all the benefits that result from the fast integration of the temporary data in the National Network monitoring system and in the EIDA data bank.
Marco Massa, Andrea Luca Rizzo, Davide Scafidi, Elisa Ferrari, Sara Lovati, Lucia Luzi, and MUDA working group
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 16, 4843–4867, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4843-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-16-4843-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
MUDA (geophysical and geochemical MUltiparametric DAtabase) is a new infrastructure of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology serving geophysical and geochemical multiparametric data. MUDA collects information from different sensors, such as seismometers, accelerometers, hydrogeochemical sensors, meteorological stations and sensors for the flux of carbon dioxide and radon gas, with the aim of making correlations between seismic phenomena and variations in environmental parameters.
Daniela Famiani, Fabrizio Cara, Giuseppe Di Giulio, Giovanna Cultrera, Francesca Pacor, Sara Lovati, Gaetano Riccio, Maurizio Vassallo, Giulio Brunelli, Antonio Costanzo, Antonella Bobbio, Marta Pischiutta, Rodolfo Puglia, Marco Massa, Rocco Cogliano, Salomon Hailemikael, Alessia Mercuri, Giuliano Milana, Luca Minarelli, Alessandro Di Filippo, Lucia Nardone, Simone Marzorati, Chiara Ladina, Debora Pantaleo, Carlo Calamita, Maria Grazia Ciaccio, Antonio Fodarella, Stefania Pucillo, Giuliana Mele, Carla Bottari, Gaetano De Luca, Luigi Falco, Antonino Memmolo, Giulia Sgattoni, and Gabriele Tarabusi
Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-162, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-2024-162, 2024
Preprint under review for ESSD
Short summary
Short summary
This paper describes data and preliminary analyses made by the INGV emergency task force EMERSITO, devoted to site effects and seismic microzonation studies, following the November 9th, 2022, MW 5.5 earthquake (Adriatic sea, Italy). Considering the earthquake affected area, EMERSITO deployed a temporary seismic network of 11 stations (net code 6N) sampling different geological units in the urban area of Ancona, the regional capital of Marche, and operated from November 2022 to February 2023.
Silvia Pondrelli, Simone Salimbeni, Judith M. Confal, Marco G. Malusà, Anne Paul, Stephane Guillot, Stefano Solarino, Elena Eva, Coralie Aubert, and Liang Zhao
Solid Earth, 15, 827–835, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-827-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-827-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We analyse and interpret seismic anisotropy from CIFALPS2 data that fill the gaps in the Western Alps and support a new hypothesis. Instead of a continuous mantle flow parallel to the belt, here we find a N–S mantle deformation pattern that merges first with a mantle deformed by slab steepening beneath the Central Alps and then merges with an asthenospheric flow sourced beneath the Massif Central. This new sketch supports the extinction of slab retreat beneath the Western Alps.
Lauro Chiaraluce, Richard Bennett, David Mencin, Wade Johnson, Massimiliano Rinaldo Barchi, Marco Bohnhoff, Paola Baccheschi, Antonio Caracausi, Carlo Calamita, Adriano Cavaliere, Adriano Gualandi, Eugenio Mandler, Maria Teresa Mariucci, Leonardo Martelli, Simone Marzorati, Paola Montone, Debora Pantaleo, Stefano Pucci, Enrico Serpelloni, Mariano Supino, Salvatore Stramondo, Catherine Hanagan, Liz Van Boskirk, Mike Gottlieb, Glen Mattioli, Marco Urbani, Francesco Mirabella, Assel Akimbekova, Simona Pierdominici, Thomas Wiersberg, Chris Marone, Luca Palmieri, and Luca Schenato
Sci. Dril., 33, 173–190, https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-33-173-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/sd-33-173-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We built six observatory stations in central Italy to monitor a fault potentially capable of generating a strong earthquake. Each site has 80–160 m deep wells equipped with strainmeters and seismometers. At the surface, we placed GNSS antennas and seismic and meteorological sensors. All data, which are open access for the scientific community, will help us to better understand the complex physical and chemical processes that lead to the generation of the full range of slow and fast earthquakes.
Konstantinos Michailos, György Hetényi, Matteo Scarponi, Josip Stipčević, Irene Bianchi, Luciana Bonatto, Wojciech Czuba, Massimo Di Bona, Aladino Govoni, Katrin Hannemann, Tomasz Janik, Dániel Kalmár, Rainer Kind, Frederik Link, Francesco Pio Lucente, Stephen Monna, Caterina Montuori, Stefan Mroczek, Anne Paul, Claudia Piromallo, Jaroslava Plomerová, Julia Rewers, Simone Salimbeni, Frederik Tilmann, Piotr Środa, Jérôme Vergne, and the AlpArray-PACASE Working Group
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 15, 2117–2138, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2117-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-2117-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We examine the spatial variability of the crustal thickness beneath the broader European Alpine region by using teleseismic earthquake information (receiver functions) on a large amount of seismic waveform data. We compile a new Moho depth map of the broader European Alps and make our results freely available. We anticipate that our results can potentially provide helpful hints for interdisciplinary imaging and numerical modeling studies.
Francesco Pintori, Enrico Serpelloni, and Adriano Gualandi
Solid Earth, 13, 1541–1567, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1541-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1541-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We study time-varying vertical deformation signals in the European
Alps by analyzing GNSS position time series. We associate the deformation
signals to geophysical forcing processes, finding that atmospheric and
hydrological loading are by far the most important cause of seasonal
displacements. Recognizing and filtering out non-tectonic signals allows us
to improve the accuracy and precision of the vertical velocities.
Giulio Viola, Giovanni Musumeci, Francesco Mazzarini, Lorenzo Tavazzani, Manuel Curzi, Espen Torgersen, Roelant van der Lelij, and Luca Aldega
Solid Earth, 13, 1327–1351, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1327-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-13-1327-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
A structural-geochronological approach helps to unravel the Zuccale Fault's architecture. By mapping its internal structure and dating some of its fault rocks, we constrained a deformation history lasting 20 Myr starting at ca. 22 Ma. Such long activity is recorded by now tightly juxtaposed brittle structural facies, i.e. different types of fault rocks. Our results also have implications on the regional evolution of the northern Apennines, of which the Zuccale Fault is an important structure.
Francesco Visini, Carlo Meletti, Andrea Rovida, Vera D'Amico, Bruno Pace, and Silvia Pondrelli
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 22, 2807–2827, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2807-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-22-2807-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
As new data are collected, seismic hazard models can be updated and improved. In the framework of a project aimed to update the Italian seismic hazard model, we proposed a model based on the definition and parametrization of area sources. Using geological data, seismicity and other geophysical constraints, we delineated three-dimensional boundaries and activity rates of a seismotectonic zoning and explored the epistemic uncertainty by means of a logic-tree approach.
Stefania Danesi, Simone Salimbeni, Alessandra Borghi, Stefano Urbini, and Massimo Frezzotti
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-29, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-29, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
Clusters of low-energy seismic events, concentrated in space and time, characterized by highly correlated waveforms (cross-correlation coefficient ≥ 0.95), occur at the floating area of a major ice stream in Antarctica (David Glacier, North Victoria Land). The transient injection of fluids from the David catchment into the regional subglacial hydrographic network, observed by GRACE measurements, is indicated as the main trigger for clustered and repeated seismic occurrences.
Silvia Pondrelli, Francesco Visini, Andrea Rovida, Vera D'Amico, Bruno Pace, and Carlo Meletti
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 3577–3592, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3577-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-20-3577-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We used 100 years of seismicity in Italy to predict the hypothetical tectonic style of future earthquakes, with the purpose of using this information in a new seismic hazard model. To squeeze all possible information out of the available data, we created a chain of criteria to be applied in the input and output selection processes. The result is a list of cases from very clear ones, e.g., extensional tectonics in the central Apennines, to completely random tectonics for future seismic events.
Letizia Anderlini, Enrico Serpelloni, Cristiano Tolomei, Paolo Marco De Martini, Giuseppe Pezzo, Adriano Gualandi, and Giorgio Spada
Solid Earth, 11, 1681–1698, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1681-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1681-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The Venetian Southern Alps (Italy) are located in a slowly deforming plate-boundary region where strong earthquakes occurred in the past even if seismological and geomorphological evidence is not conclusive about the specific thrust faults involved. In this study, we integrate and model different geodetic datasets of ground velocity to constrain the seismogenic potential of the studied faults, giving an example of the importance of using vertical geodetic data for seismic hazard estimates.
Laura Petrescu, Silvia Pondrelli, Simone Salimbeni, Manuele Faccenda, and the AlpArray Working Group
Solid Earth, 11, 1275–1290, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1275-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1275-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
To place constraints on the mantle deformation beneath the Central Alps and the greater Alpine region, we analysed the appropriate seismic signal recorded by more than 100 stations, belonging to AlpArray and to other permanent networks. We took a picture of the imprinting that Alpine orogen history and related subductions left at depth, with a mainly orogen-parallel mantle deformation from Western Alps to Eastern Alps, but also N to S from the Po Plain to the Rhine Graben.
Alberto Michelini, Lucia Margheriti, Marco Cattaneo, Gianpaolo Cecere, Giuseppe D'Anna, Alberto Delladio, Milena Moretti, Stefano Pintore, Alessandro Amato, Alberto Basili, Andrea Bono, Paolo Casale, Peter Danecek, Martina Demartin, Licia Faenza, Valentino Lauciani, Alfonso Giovanni Mandiello, Alessandro Marchetti, Carlo Marcocci, Salvatore Mazza, Francesco Mariano Mele, Anna Nardi, Concetta Nostro, Maurizio Pignone, Matteo Quintiliani, Sandro Rao, Laura Scognamiglio, and Giulio Selvaggi
Adv. Geosci., 43, 31–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-43-31-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-43-31-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
The Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia runs the Italian National Seismic Network (about 400 stations, seismometers, accelerometers and GPS antennas) and other networks at national scale for monitoring earthquakes and tsunami as a part of the National Civil Protection System coordinated by the Italian Department of Civil Protection. This work summarises the acquisition and the distribution of the data and the analysis that are carried out for seismic surveillance and tsunami alert.
Irene Molinari, John Clinton, Edi Kissling, György Hetényi, Domenico Giardini, Josip Stipčević, Iva Dasović, Marijan Herak, Vesna Šipka, Zoltán Wéber, Zoltán Gráczer, Stefano Solarino, the Swiss-AlpArray Field Team, and the AlpArray Working Group
Adv. Geosci., 43, 15–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-43-15-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-43-15-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
AlpArray is a collaborative seismological project in Europe that includes ~ 50 research institutes and seismological observatories. At its heart is the collection of top-quality seismological data from a dense network of stations in the Alpine region: the AlpArray Seismic Network (AASN). We report the Swiss contribution: site selections, installation, data quality and management. We deployed 27 temporary BB stations across 5 countries as result of a fruitful collaboration between 5 institutes.
A. Govoni, L. Margheriti, M. Moretti, V. Lauciani, G. Sensale, A. Bucci, and F. Criscuoli
Adv. Geosci., 41, 35–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-41-35-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-41-35-2015, 2015
Short summary
Short summary
We designed, setup and tested on the field an 'easy to deploy' temporary UMTS real-time seismic network resolving or minimizing the main drawbacks: Internet security, signal and service availability, power consumption.Overall this solution has proved to be a very cost effective approach with real-time data acquisition rates usually greater than 97% and all the benefits that result from the fast integration of the temporary data in the National Network monitoring system and in the EIDA data bank.
Cited articles
Albuquerque Seismological Laboratory (ASL)/USGS: Global Seismograph Network (GSN – IRIS/USGS). International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/IU, 1988.
AlpArray Seismic Network: AlpArray Seismic Network (AASN) temporary component, AlpArray Working Group, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.12686/alparray/z3_2015, 2015.
Beyreuther, M., Barsch, R., Krischer, L., Megies, T., Behr, Y., and Wassermann, J.: ObsPy: A Python Toolbox for Seismology, Seismological Research Letters, 81, 530–533, https://doi.org/10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530, 2010.
GEOFON Data Centre: GEOFON Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.14470/TR560404, 1993.
Geological Survey-Provincia Autonoma di Trento: Trentino Seismic Network, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/ST, 1981.
Govoni, A., Margheriti, L., Moretti, M., Lauciani, V., Sensale, G., Bucci, A., and Criscuoli, F.: UMTS rapid response real-time seismic networks: implementation and strategies at INGV, Adv. Geosci., 41, 35–42, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-41-35-2015, 2015.
INGV Seismological Data Centre: Rete Sismica Nazionale (RSN), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), Italy, https://doi.org/10.13127/SD/X0FXnH7QfY, 1997.
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP) and Ecole et Observatoire des Sciences de la Terre de Strasbourg (EOST): GEOSCOPE, French Global Network of broad band seismic stations, Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris (IPGP), https://doi.org/10.18715/GEOSCOPE.G, 1982.
Institute of Geophysics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic: Czech Regional Seismic Network, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/CZ, 1973.
Kövesligethy Radó Seismological Observatory: (Geodetic and Geophysical Institute, Research Centre for Astronomy and Earth Sciences, Hungarian Academy of Sciences (MTA CSFK GGI KRSZO)), Hungarian National Seismological Network, https://doi.org/10.14470/UH028726, 1992.
Krischer, L., Megies, T., Barsch, R., Beyreuther, M., Lecocq, T., Caudron, C., and Wassermann, J.: ObsPy: a bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem, Computational Science & Discovery, 8, 014003, http://stacks.iop.org/1749-4699/8/i=1/a=014003, 2015.
Lovati, S., Picarreda, D., and Massa, M.: NETHIX WE-120: un dispositivo di telecontrollo per l'ottimizzazione di sistemi di trasmissione di dati sismologici in tempo reale, Rapporti Tecnici INGV (ISSN 2039-7941), 278, 1–22, http://istituto.ingv.it/l-ingv/produzione-scientifica/rapporti-tecnici-ingv/archivio/rapporti-tecnici 2014/2014-05-28.4171101920, 2014.
Marzorati, S. and Bindi, D.: Ambient noise levels in north central Italy, Geochem. Geophy. Geosy., 7, q09010, https://doi.org/10.1029/2006GC001256, 2006.
MedNet project partner institutions: Mediterranean Very Broadband Seismographic Network (MedNet), Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), https://doi.org/10.13127/SD/fBBBtDtd6q, 1988.
Michelini, A., Margheriti, L., Cattaneo, M., Cecere, G., D'Anna, G., Delladio, A., Moretti, M., Pintore, S., Amato, A., Basili, A., Bono, A., Casale, P., Danecek, P., Demartin, M., Faenza, L., Lauciani, V., Mandiello, A. G., Marchetti, A., Marcocci, C., Mazza, S., Mele, F. M., Nardi, A., Nostro, C., Pignone, M., Quintiliani, M., Rao, S., Scognamiglio, L., and Selvaggi, G.: The Italian National Seismic Network and the earthquake and tsunami monitoring and surveillance systems, Adv. Geosci., 43, 31–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-43-31-2016, 2016.
Molinari, I., Clinton, J., Kissling, E., Hetényi, G., Giardini, D., Stipcevic, J., Dasovic, I., Herak, M., Šipka, V., Wéber, Z., Gráczer, Z., Solarino, S., the Swiss-AlpArray Field Team, and the AlpArray Working Group: Swiss-AlpArray temporary broadband seismic stations deployment and noise characterization, Adv. Geosci., 43, 15–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-43-15-2016, 2016.
Moretti, M., Margheriti, L., and Govoni, A.: Rapid Response to the Earthquake Emergencies in Italy: Temporary Seismic Networks Coordinated Deployments in the Last Five Years, 585–599, Springer International Publishing, Cham, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21753-6_24, 2016.
OGS (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale) and University of Trieste: North-East Italy Broadband Network, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/NI, 2002.
OGS (Istituto Nazionale di Oceanografia e di Geofisica Sperimentale): North-East Italy Seismic Network, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/OX, 2016.
Peterson, J.: Observations and modeling of seismic background noise, Tech. rep., USGS Open-File Report, 1993.
RESIF: RESIF-RLBP French Broad-band network, RESIF-RAP strong motion network and other seismic stations in metropolitan France, RESIF – Réseau sismologique & géodésique français, https://doi.org/10.15778/RESIF.FR, 1995.
Swiss Seismological Service (SED) at ETH Zürich: National Seismic Networks of Switzerland, ETH Zürich, https://doi.org/10.12686/sed/networks/ch, 1983.
University of Genova: Regional Seismic Network of North Western Italy, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/GU, 1967.
University of Trieste: Friuli Venezia Giulia Accelerometric Network, International Federation of Digital Seismograph Networks, Other/Seismic Network, https://doi.org/10.7914/SN/RF, 1993.
Wessel, P. and Smith, W. H. F.: New, improved version of generic mapping tools released, Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 79, 579–579, https://doi.org/10.1029/98EO00426, 1998.
Williams, T. and Kelley, C.: gnuplot User Manual, http://www.gnuplot.info/documentation.html (last access: 1 March 2017), 2016.
Short summary
We describe here the contribution of Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia (INGV) to the AlpArray Seismic Network (AASN) in the framework of the AlpArray project (http://www.alparray.ethz.ch), a large European collaborative research initiative.
The aim of AlpArray is carrying out cutting edge research to advance our understanding of the deep structure, geodynamics, tectonics and seismic hazard of the greater Alpine area (Alps-Apennines-Carpathians-Dinarides orogenic system).
We describe here the contribution of Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanolgia (INGV) to the...
