20 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. On the influence of the ground track on the gravity field recovery from high–low satellite-to-satellite tracking missions: CHAMP monthly gravity field recovery using the energy balance approach revisited M. Weigelt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-009-0330-5
2. Near-Real-Time Global Thermospheric Density Variations Unveiled by Starlink Ephemeris Z. Ou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17091549
3. GOCE orbit analysis: Long-wavelength gravity field determination using the acceleration approach O. Baur et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.04.022
4. Deriving Thermospheric Density from GNSS POD: An Orthogonal Polynomial Differentiation Approach for Accelerometer-Free LEO Satellites—A High-Fidelity Simulation Study L. Yao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13080682
5. Accuracy analysis of geopotential coefficients recovered from in-situ disturbing potential by energy conservation method X. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11806-007-0111-3
6. Regional gravity field model in Pakistan area from the combination of CHAMP, GRACE and ground data using least squares collocation: A case study M. Sadiq et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2010.07.004
7. A CHAMP‐only gravity field model from kinematic orbits using the energy integral C. Gerlach et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018025
8. Global Gravity Field Model from Taiji-1 Observations L. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12217-022-09998-5
9. Gravity field recovery from GOCE orbits using the energy conservation approach S. Yong & F. Dongming https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2013.02040
10. Bridging the gap between GRACE and GRACE Follow-On by combining high–low satellite-to-satellite tracking data and satellite laser ranging M. Weigelt et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-024-01888-5
11. ‘DEOS_CHAMP-01C_70’: a model of the Earth’s gravity field computed from accelerations of the CHAMP satellite P. Ditmar et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-005-0008-6
12. Numerical Simulation of Earth's Gravitational Field Recovery from SSt Based on the Energy Conservation Principle W. ZHENG et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.878
13. Derivation of the CHAMP-only global gravity field model TUG-CHAMP04 applying the energy integral approach T. Badura et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-006-0002-3
14. Comparison of GOCE-GPS gravity fields derived by different approaches O. Baur et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-014-0736-6
15. The Rotation of the Gravity Potential on the Earth's Gravity Field Recovery https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.814
16. The average acceleration approach applied to gravity coefficients recovery based on GOCE orbits H. Qiang & F. Dongming https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1246.2012.00018
17. An improved energy balance approach and its application in CHAMP gravity field recovery T. Xu & K. He https://doi.org/10.1007/s11806-008-0080-1
18. Determination of Earth Gravity Field Model WHU‐GM‐05 Using Grace Gravity Data https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.1291
19. CHAMP Gravity Field Recovery Using Kinematic Orbits T. XU & Y. YANG https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.656
20. Progress in Atmospheric Density Inversion Based on LEO Satellites and Preliminary Experiments for SWARM-A X. Bian et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17050793