Advances in Geosciences
Advances in Geosciences
ADGEO

Volume 1, 2003 | G1. The new gravity field mission (CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE): from measurements to geophysical interpretation

EGS XXVII General Assembly, Nice, France, 21–26 April 2002
Editor(s): R. Klees and G. Balmino
Volumes
Volumes

Volume 1, 2003 | G1. The new gravity field mission (CHAMP, GRACE, GOCE): from measurements to geophysical interpretation

EGS XXVII General Assembly, Nice, France, 21–26 April 2002
Editor(s): R. Klees and G. Balmino
17 Jun 2003
Analysis of one month of CHAMP state vector and accelerometer data for the recovery of the gravity potential
E. Howe, L. Stenseng, and C. C. Tscherning
Adv. Geosci., 1, 1–4, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-1-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-1-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
GOCE SGG and SST quick-look gravity field analysis
R. Pail and M. Wermut
Adv. Geosci., 1, 5–9, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-5-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-5-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
Local gravity field continuation for the purpose of in-orbit calibration of GOCE SGG observations
R. Pail
Adv. Geosci., 1, 11–18, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-11-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-11-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
Static and temporal gravity field recovery using grace potential difference observables
S.-C. Han, C. Jekeli, and C. K. Shum
Adv. Geosci., 1, 19–26, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-19-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-19-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
Error assessment of GOCE SGG data using along track interpolation
J. Bouman and R. Koop
Adv. Geosci., 1, 27–32, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-27-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-27-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
GOCE gradients in various reference frames and their accuracies
J. Müller and M. Wermut
Adv. Geosci., 1, 33–38, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-33-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-33-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
Comparison of numerical solution strategies for gravity field recovery from GOCE SGG observations implemented on a parallel platform
R. Pail and G. Plank
Adv. Geosci., 1, 39–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-39-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-39-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
Kinematic and reduced-dynamic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters
D. Švehla and M. Rothacher
Adv. Geosci., 1, 47–56, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-47-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-47-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
Integrated sensor analysis for GRACE – development and validation
B. Frommknecht, H. Oberndorfer, F. Flechtner, and R. Schmidt
Adv. Geosci., 1, 57–63, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-57-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-57-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
The potential of ground gravity measurements to validate GRACE data
D. Crossley, J. Hinderer, M. Llubes, and N. Florsch
Adv. Geosci., 1, 65–71, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-65-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-65-2003, 2003
17 Jun 2003
CHAMP gravity field recovery using the energy balance approach
Ch. Gerlach, N. Sneeuw, P. Visser, and D. Švehla
Adv. Geosci., 1, 73–80, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-73-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-73-2003, 2003
23 Jun 2003
Noise variance estimation and optimal weight determination for GOCE gravity recovery­
J. Kusche
Adv. Geosci., 1, 81–85, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-81-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-81-2003, 2003
30 Jun 2003
On the joint inversion of SGG and SST data from the GOCE mission
P. Ditmar, P. Visser, and R. Klees
Adv. Geosci., 1, 87–94, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-87-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-87-2003, 2003
30 Jun 2003
A first analysis of the mean motion of CHAMP
F. Deleflie, P. Exertier, P. Berio, G. Metris, O. Laurain, J.-M. Lemoine, and S. Loyer
Adv. Geosci., 1, 95–101, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-95-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-95-2003, 2003
30 Jun 2003
Why the 18.6 year tide cannot explain the change of sign observed in j2
F. Deleflie, P. Exertier, G. Metris, P. Berio, O. Laurain, J.-M. Lemoine, and R. Biancale
Adv. Geosci., 1, 103–108, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-103-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-103-2003, 2003
30 Jun 2003
Satellite orbit determination using satellite gravity gradiometry observations in GOCE mission perspective
A. Bobojć and A. Drożyner
Adv. Geosci., 1, 109–112, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-109-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-109-2003, 2003
11 Jul 2003
Space gravity spectroscopy: the benefits of Taylor-Karman structured criterion matrices
P. Marinkovice, E. Grafarend, and T. Reubelt
Adv. Geosci., 1, 113–120, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-113-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-113-2003, 2003
11 Jul 2003
Assessment of two methods for gravity field recovery from GOCE GPS-SST orbit solutions
K. Arsov and R. Pail
Adv. Geosci., 1, 121–126, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-121-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-121-2003, 2003
11 Jul 2003
Space Gravity Spectroscopy - determination of the Earth’s gravitational field by means of Newton interpolated LEO ephemeris Case studies on dynamic (CHAMP Rapid Science Orbit) and kinematic orbits
T. Reubelt, G. Austen, and E. W. Grafarend
Adv. Geosci., 1, 127–135, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-127-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-127-2003, 2003
18 Jul 2003
From the time-wise to space-wise GOCE observables
M. Reguzzoni
Adv. Geosci., 1, 137–142, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-137-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-137-2003, 2003
12 Aug 2003
Globally covering a-priori regional gravity covariance models
D. Arabelos and C. C. Tscherning
Adv. Geosci., 1, 143–147, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-143-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-143-2003, 2003
02 Oct 2003
The possibility of the calibration/validation of the GOCE data with the balloon-borne gradiometer
J. B. Zieliński and M. S. Petrovskaya
Adv. Geosci., 1, 149–153, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-149-2003,https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-1-149-2003, 2003
CC BY 4.0