08 Dec 2022
| 08 Dec 2022
Numerical investigations to assess ground subsidence and fault reactivation during underground coal gasification
Related authors
Adv. Geosci., 58, 67–76, 2022
Cited articles
Advani, S. H., Lee, J. K., Min, O. K., Aboustit, B. L., Chen, S. M., and Lee,
S. C.: Stress mediated responses associated with UCG cavity and subsidence
prediction modelling, in: Proceedings of the ninth annual underground coal
gasification symposium, 282–292, Bloomingdale, IL, USA, https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1065489/m2/1/high_res_d/5295596.pdf (last access: 1 November 2022), 1983.
Fodor, B.: Magyarország szénhezkötött metánvagyona.,
Coalbed methane in-place resources in Hungary, Földtani
Közlöny 136/4, 573–590, 2006.
Itasca Consulting Group Inc: User Manual for 3DEC (Version 7.0), https://www.itascacg.com/software/3DEC (last access: 1 November 2022), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7373574, 2021.
Kempka, T., Nakaten, B., De Lucia, M., Nakaten, N., Otto, C., Pohl, M.,
Tillner, E., and Kühn, M.: Flexible Simulation Framework to Couple
Processes in Complex 3D Models for Subsurface Utilization Assessment, Energ.
Proc., 97, 494–501, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.058, 2016.
Kempka, T., Steding, S., Tranter, M., Otto, C., Gorka, T., Hámor-Vidó, M., Basa, W., Kapusta, K., and Kalmár, I.: Probability of contaminant migration from abandoned in-situ coal conversion reactors, EGU General Assembly 2022, Vienna, Austria, 23–27 May 2022, EGU22-11204, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu22-11204, 2022.
