02 Apr 2020
| 02 Apr 2020
Drawing everyday sexism in academia: observations and analysis of a community-based initiative
Marie Bocher
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich,
Zurich, Switzerland
Martina Ulvrova
Institute of Geophysics, Department of Earth Sciences, ETH Zurich,
Zurich, Switzerland
Maëlis Arnould
Centre for Earth Evolution and Dynamics, University of Oslo, Oslo,
Norway
Nicolas Coltice
Laboratoire de Géologie, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris,
France
Claire Mallard
Earthbyte Research Group, School of Geosciences, The University of
Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Mélanie Gérault
Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, MIT, Cambridge, USA
Alice Adenis
Dataswati, Massy, Ile-de-France, France
Related authors
Marie Bocher, Alexandre Fournier, and Nicolas Coltice
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 99–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-99-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-99-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a new method to reconstruct the circulation in the Earth's mantle for the last 300 Myr. This method is based on the sequential assimilation of plate layouts obtained from plate tectonic reconstructions into mantle convection models. This method allows us to take into account uncertainties in plate tectonic reconstructions, and provides an estimation of the uncertainties in the final result. We test and validate this method in a controlled environment by using synthetic experiments.
Beatriz Hadler Boggiani, Tristan Salles, Claire Mallard, and Nicholas Atwood
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1868, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-1868, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
We studied how erosion and tectonic forces can affect the exposure and preservation of copper deposits formed in subduction zones in the past 65 million years. We used a global model that simulates landscape changes over time based on climate and elevation changes. Our findings show that climate is more important in preserving or exposing copper deposits than previously described. We help improve methods for locating copper deposits offering new insights for mineral exploration.
Thomas Frasson, Stéphane Labrosse, Henri-Claude Nataf, Nicolas Coltice, and Nicolas Flament
Solid Earth, 15, 617–637, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-617-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/se-15-617-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Heat flux heterogeneities at the bottom of Earth's mantle play an important role in the dynamic of the underlying core. Here, we study how these heterogeneities are affected by the global rotation of the Earth, called true polar wander (TPW), which has to be considered to relate mantle dynamics with core dynamics. We find that TPW can greatly modify the large scales of heat flux heterogeneities, notably at short timescales. We provide representative maps of these heterogeneities.
Sara Polanco, Mike Blum, Tristan Salles, Bruce C. Frederick, Rebecca Farrington, Xuesong Ding, Ben Mather, Claire Mallard, and Louis Moresi
Earth Surf. Dynam., 12, 301–320, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-301-2024, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-12-301-2024, 2024
Short summary
Short summary
Two-thirds of the world's most populated cities are situated close to deltas. We use computer simulations to understand how deltas sink or rise in response to climate-driven sea level changes that operate from thousands to millions of years. Our research shows that because of the interaction between the outer layers of the Earth, sediment transport, and sea level changes deltas develop a self-regulated mechanism that modifies the space they need to gain or lose land.
Thomas Frasson, Stéphane Labrosse, Henri-Claude Nataf, and Nicolas Coltice
EGUsphere, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1172, https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2022-1172, 2022
Preprint archived
Short summary
Short summary
We used the results of a global 3d mantle convection model showing plate-like behaviour to study the heat flux at the base of the mantle and the wandering of the pole due to masses displacement inside the Earth during mantle convection. Subduction zones and continents are driving this wandering by maintaining themselves close to the equator, which translates in high equatorial heat flux patches in the lower mantle. The dominant heat flux patterns can be related to surface plate-tectonics.
Claire A. Mallard and Tristan Salles
Earth Surf. Dynam. Discuss., https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2021-89, https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-2021-89, 2021
Preprint withdrawn
Short summary
Short summary
Using landscape evolution models integrating mantle dynamics, climate, eustatism and surface processes, we break down a previous idea that considers mantle flow as the main driver of the pulse of sedimentation in the Orange Basin, SA, over the last 30 Ma. Instead, climate impact seems to be a predominant mechanism. We also show that sediment flux and landscape evolution in the region is the product of interlinked processes accounting for both lithology variations, mantle dynamics and climate.
Marie Bocher, Alexandre Fournier, and Nicolas Coltice
Nonlin. Processes Geophys., 25, 99–123, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-99-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/npg-25-99-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
We propose a new method to reconstruct the circulation in the Earth's mantle for the last 300 Myr. This method is based on the sequential assimilation of plate layouts obtained from plate tectonic reconstructions into mantle convection models. This method allows us to take into account uncertainties in plate tectonic reconstructions, and provides an estimation of the uncertainties in the final result. We test and validate this method in a controlled environment by using synthetic experiments.
M. Ulvrová, R. Paris, K. Kelfoun, and P. Nomikou
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 14, 401–412, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-401-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-401-2014, 2014
Cited articles
500 Women Scientists Zurich pod: 500 Women Scientists Zurich pod, available at: https://baug.ethz.ch/en/department/governance/gender-and-diversity/500-women-scientists.html, last access: 9 March 2020.
500 Women Scientists: 500WS “Breaking the Gender Barriers,”, available at: https://video.ethz.ch/events/2019/ws500.html, last access: 30
November 2019a.
Adenis, A.: Entrelacs, available at:
https://entrelacsbd.wordpress.com/, last access: 20 November, 2019.
Adenis, A., Arnould, M., Bocher, M., Coltice, N., Gérault, M., Mallard, C., and Ulvrova, M.: didthisreallyhappen.net: Fighting everyday sexism in academia, one comic strip at a time,Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 20, EGU2018-18456, EGU General Assembly, available at: https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/EGU2018-18456.pdf (last access: 9 March 2020), 2018.
ADVANCEGeo Partnership, available at:
https://serc.carleton.edu/advancegeo/about.html, last access: 9 February,
2020.
Alves de Jesus Rydin, C., Montanari, A., Bocher, M., and Gallego Torres, D.:
Unconscious bias, available at:
https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2018/session/28942 (last access: 9 March 2020), 2018.
Alves de Jesus Rydin, C., Conley, D., and Bocher, M.: Unconscious bias, available at:
https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2019/session/30877, last access: 20 November, 2019.
Arnould, M., Bocher, M., Coltice, N., Gérault, M., Mallard, C. and
Ulvrova, M.: Beyond statistics: local solutions to the underrepresentation
of women in Geophysics, Geophysical Research Abstracts, Vol. 19, EGU2017-17770, 2017.
Ashburn-Nardo, L. and Abdul Karim, M. F.: 2 – The CPR model: Decisions
involved in confronting prejudiced responses, in Confronting Prejudice and
Discrimination, edited by: Mallett, R. K. and Monteith, M. J.,
Academic Press, 29–47, 2019.
Asplund, M. and Welle, C. G.: Advancing Science: How Bias Holds Us Back,
Neuron, 99, 635–639, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.07.045, 2018.
Baron, R. S., Burgess, M. L., and Kao, C. F.: Detecting and labeling
prejudice: Do female perpetrators go undetected?, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull.,
17, 115–123, 1991.
Becker, J. C. and Swim, J. K.: Seeing the unseen: Attention to daily
encounters with sexism as a way to reduce sexist beliefs, Psychol. Women Q.,
35, 227–242, https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684310397509, 2011.
Bedford, B.: Illustrating Casual Sexism in Science, EOS, 99, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EO111589, 2018.
Bernard, R. E. and Cooperdock, E. H. G.: No progress on diversity in 40
years, Nat. Geosci., 11, 292–295, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0116-6, 2018.
Biggs, J., Hawley, P. H. and Biernat, M.: The Academic Conference as a
Chilly Climate for Women: Effects of Gender Representation on Experiences of
Sexism, Coping Responses, and Career Intentions, Sex Roles, 78, 394–408,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0800-9, 2018.
Bocher, M. and Adenis, A.: Help us fight patriarchy, one comic strip at a
time!, EGU Geodyn. Blog, available at:
https://blogs.egu.eu/divisions/gd/2018/03/21/help-us-fight-patriarchy-one-comic-strip-at-a-time/
(last access: 20 November 2019), 2018.
Bocher, M., Adenis, A., Arnould, M., Coltice, N., Gérault, M., Mallard,
C., and Ulvrova, M.: Did this really happen?!, available at:
https://m.facebook.com/events/2402908089942941/ (last access: 9 March 2020), 2019a.
Bocher, M., Adenis, A., Arnould, M., Coltice, N., Gérault, M., Mallard,
C., and Ulvrova, M.: Feminist activism in academia: A grassroot initiative
perspective, available at: https://www.iscientist.berlin/ (last access: 9 March 2020), 2019b.
Buitendijk, S., Curry, S., and Maes, K.: Equality, diversity and inclusion at
universities: the power of a systemic approach, available at:
https://www.leru.org/publications/equality-diversity-and-inclusion-at-universities, last access: 22 November, 2019.
Burgess, D. and Borgida, E.: Who women are, who women should be: Descriptive
and prescriptive gender stereotyping in sex discrimination, Psychol. Public
Policy Law, 5, 665–692, https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.665, 2000.
Castilla, E. J. and Benard, S.: The Paradox of Meritocracy in Organizations,
Adm. Sci. Q., 55, 543–676, https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2010.55.4.543, 2010.
Ceci, S. J., Ginther, D. K., Kahn, S., and Williams, W. M.: Women in Academic
Science: A Changing Landscape, Psychol. Sci. Public Interest J. Am. Psychol.
Soc., 15, 75–141, https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100614541236, 2014.
Chávez, K. and Mitchell, K. M. W.: Exploring Bias in Student
Evaluations: Gender, Race, and Ethnicity, PS Polit. Sci. Polit., 1–5,
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096519001744, 2019.
Clancy, K. B. H., Lee, K. M. N., Rodgers, E. M., and Richey, C.: Double
jeopardy in astronomy and planetary science: Women of color face greater
risks of gendered and racial harassment, J. Geophys. Res.-Planet., 122,
1610–1623, https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JE005256, 2017.
Coltice, N. and Bocher, M.: Growing up as a feminine team through a European
project, EGU General Assembly 2016, Vienna Austria, 17–22 April, 2016, EPSC2016-14722, 2016.
Crenshaw, K.: Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black
feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and
antiracist politics, Univ. Chic. Leg. Forum, 1989, 131, 1989.
Dobbin, F. and Kalev, A.: Why diversity programs fail and what works better,
Harvard Business Review, 94, 52–60, 2016.
Drury, B. J. and Kaiser, C. R.: Allies against sexism: The role of men in
confronting sexism, J. Soc. Issues, 70, 637–652, https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12083,
2014.
DTRH team: Did this really happen?!, available at:
https://didthisreallyhappen.net/, last access: 20 November, 2019a).
Dutt, K., Pfaff, D. L., Bernstein, A. F., Dillard, J. S., and Block, C. J.:
Gender differences in recommendation letters for postdoctoral fellowships in
geoscience, Nat. Geosci., 9, 805–808, https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo2819, 2016.
Dyer, J., Townsend, A., Kanani, S., Matthews, P., Palermo, A., Farley, S.
and Thorley, C.: Exploring the workplace for LGBT+ Physical Scientists,
Institute of Physics, Royal Astronomical Society and Royal Society of
Chemistry, 52 pp., 2019.
Eagly, A. H. and Mladinic, A. : Are people prejudiced against women? Some
answers from research on attitudes, gender stereotypes, and judgments of
competence, Eur. Rev. soc. Psychol., 5, 1–35, https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779543000002, 1994.
Eagly, A. H. and Wood, W.: Social Role Theory, in Handbook of Theories of
Social Psychology,SAGE Publications Ltd, London, UK, 458–476, 2012.
Égalité group: Égalité group website, available at: https://www.facebook.com/EgaliteIPGP/, last access: 20 November, 2019.
Ellemers, N., den Heuvel, H. V., de Gilder, D., Maass, A., and Bonvini, A.:
The underrepresentation of women in science: Differential commitment or the
queen bee syndrome?, Br. J. Soc. Psychol., 43, 315–338,
https://doi.org/10.1348/0144666042037999, 2004.
Equal Opportunity Committee CRC-TR211: Equal Opportunity Committee
CRC-TR211, available at:
https://itp.uni-frankfurt.de/~ strongmatter/#Equality, last access: 20 November, 2019.
EqualiTea: EqualiTea, available at:
https://www.vame-erdw.ethz.ch/initiatives-and-working-groups/equalitea/, last access: 24 November, 2019.
Everyday Sexism Project: Everyday Sexism Project, available at:
https://everydaysexism.com/, last access: 29 November, 2019.
Fleming, N.: How to organize a conference that's open to everyone, Nature,
571, S46–S47, https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02253-9, 2019.
Ford, H. L., Brick, C., Blaufuss, K., and Dekens, P. S.: Gender inequity in
speaking opportunities at the American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, Nat.
Commun., 9, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03809-5, 2018.
Gérault, M., Adenis, A., Arnould, M., Bocher, M., Coltice, N., Mallard, C., and Ulvrova, M.: didthisreallyhappen.net: Fighting everyday
sexism in academia, one comic strip at a time, AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts 2018, ED21A-09, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AGUFMED21A..09G/abstract (last access: 9 March 2020), 2018.
Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B.,
Adetoun, B., Osagie, J. E., Akande, A., Alao, A., Annetje, B., Willemsen, T.
M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T.,
Six-Materna, I., Expósito, F., Moya, M., Foddy, M., Kim, H.-J.,
Lameiras, M., Sotelo, M. J., Mucchi-Faina, A., Romani, M., Sakalli, N.,
Udegbe, B., Yamamoto, M., Ui, M., Ferreira, M. C., and López, W. L.:
Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across
cultures, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 79, 763–775,
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763, 2000.
Greider, C. W., Sheltzer, J. M., Cantalupo, N. C., Copeland, W. B.,
Dasgupta, N., Hopkins, N., Jansen, J. M., Joshua-Tor, L., McDowell, G. S.,
Metcalf, J. L., McLaughlin, B., Olivarius, A., O'Shea, E. K., Raymond, J.
L., Ruebain, D., Steitz, J. A., Stillman, B., Tilghman, S. M., Valian, V.,
Villa-Komaroff, L., and Wong, J. Y.: Increasing gender diversity in the STEM
research workforce, Science, 366, 692–695,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz0649, 2019.
Haines, E. L., Deaux, K., and Lofaro, N.: The Times They Are Changing
… or Are They Not? A Comparison of Gender Stereotypes,
1983–2014, Psychol. Women Q., 40, 353–363,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684316634081, 2016.
Handley, I. M., Brown, E. R., Moss-Racusin, C. A., and Smith, J. L.: Quality
of evidence revealing subtle gender biases in science is in the eye of the
beholder, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 112, 13201–13206,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1510649112, 2015.
Hardacre, S. L. and Subašić, E.: Whose Issue Is It Anyway? The
Effects of Leader Gender and Equality Message Framing on Men's and Women's
Mobilization Toward Workplace Gender Equality, Front. Psychol., 9, 2497,
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02497, 2018.
Hentschel, T., Heilman, M. E., and Peus, C. V.: The Multiple Dimensions of
Gender Stereotypes: A Current Look at Men's and Women's Characterizations of
Others and Themselves, Front. Psychol., 10, 11, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00011,
2019.
Holmes, M. A.: A Sociological Framework to Address Gender Parity, in: Women
in the geosciences: practical, positive practices toward parity, edited by:
Holmes, M. A., Oconnel, S., and Kuheli, D., AGU, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119067573.ch3, 2015.
Jahren, A. H.: She Wanted to Do Her Research. He Wanted to Talk “Feelings”,
New York Times, available
at: https://www.nytimes.com/2016/03/06/opinion/sunday/she-wanted-to-do-her-research-he-wanted-to-talk-feelings.html?auth=login-google&smid=tw-nytopinion&smtyp=cur
(last access: 3 February 2020), 2016.
John, K. S., Riggs, E., and Mogk, D.: Sexual Harassment in the Sciences: A
Call to Geoscience Faculty and Researchers to Respond, J. Geosci. Educ.,
64, 255–257, https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-64.4.255, 2016.
Kaatz, A., Lee, Y. G., Potvien, A., Magua, W., Filut, A., Bhattacharya, A.,
Leatherberry, R., Zhu, X., and Carnes, M.: Analysis of National Institutes of
Health R01 Application Critiques, Impact, and Criteria Scores: Does the Sex
of the Principal Investigator Make a Difference?, Acad. Med. J. Assoc. Am.
Med. Coll., 91, 1080–1088, https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001272, 2016.
Lerback, J. and Hanson, B.: Journals invite too few women to referee,
Nature, 541, 455–457, https://doi.org/10.1038/541455a, 2017.
Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., and Linn, M. C.: Women's representation in
science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66
nations, J. Educ. Psychol., 107, 631–644, https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000005, 2014.
Mission égalité – diversité: Mission égalité -
diversité, Mission Égal. – Divers. – Univ. Claude Bernard Lyon 1, available at: https://egalite-diversite.univ-lyon1.fr/, last access: 24 November, 2019a.
Monroe, K. R., Choi, J., Howell, E., Lampros-Monroe, C., Trejo, C., and
Perez, V.: Gender Equality in the Ivory Tower, and How Best to Achieve It,
PS Polit. Sci. Polit., 47, 418–426, https://doi.org/10.1017/S104909651400033X, 2014.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., and
Handelsman, J.: Science faculty's subtle gender biases favor male students,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109, 16474–16479, 2012.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Toorn, J. van der, Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L.,
Graham, M. J., and Handelsman, J.: Scientific Diversity Interventions,
Science, 343, 615–616, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1245936, 2014.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Sanzari, C., Caluori, N., and Rabasco, H.: Gender Bias
Produces Gender Gaps in STEM Engagement, Sex Roles, 79, 651–670,
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0902-z, 2018.
Popp, A. L., Lutz, S. R., Khatami, S., van Emmerik, T. H. M., and Knoben, W.
J. M.: A Global Survey on the Perceptions and Impacts of Gender Inequality
in the Earth and Space Sciences, Earth Space Sci., 6, 1460–1468,
https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EA000706, 2019.
Pourquoi il faut plus de filles en sciences: Pourquoi il faut plus de filles
en sciences, CQFD, available at:
https://pages.rts.ch/la-1ere/programmes/cqfd/10098548-pourquoi-il-faut-plus-de-filles-en-sciences-10-01-2019.html?mediaShare=1, last access: 20 November, 2019.
Powell, A.: Review of Bystander Approaches in Support of Preventing Violence
Against Women, Victoria Health Promotion
Foundation, Victoria, New South Wales, Publication P-052-V B, available at:
http://www.ncdsv.org/images/VicHealth_ReviewBystanderApproachesSupportPreventing VAW_5-2011.pdf
(last access: 9 February 2020), 2011.
Régner, I., Thinus-Blanc, C., Netter, A., Schmader, T., and Huguet, P.:
Committees with implicit biases promote fewer women when they do not believe
gender bias exists, Nat. Hum. Behav., 3, 1171–1179,
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0686-3, 2019.
Risman, B. J.: Gender as a social structure: Theory wrestling with activism,
Gender Soc., 18, 429–450, https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243204265349, 2004.
Sarachild, K.: A Program For Feminist “Consciousness Raising”, 1968.
Sciences pour tous: Où sont les femmes? Quelle place pour les femmes
dans la recherche?, available at:
https://sciencespourtous.univ-lyon1.fr/sciences-lemission-place-femmes-sciences/?doing_wp_cron=1574028322.0250759124755859375000
(last access: 20
November, 2019.
Sexes égaux, sciences égales?? Sexes égaux, sciences
égales??, Popsciencesuniversite-Lyon, available at:
https://popsciences.universite-lyon.fr/agenda/sexes-egaux-sciences-egales/
(last access: 24 November 2019), 2018.
Sheltzer, J. M. and Smith, J. C.: Elite male faculty in the life sciences
employ fewer women, P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111, 10107–10112,
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1403334111, 2014.
Simon, P.: Collecting ethnic statistics in Europe: a review, Ethn. Racial
Stud., 35, 1366–1391, https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.607507, 2012.
Staines, G., Tavris, C. and Jayaratne, T. E.: The queen bee syndrome, Psychology Today, 7, 55–60, 1974.
Sterk, N., Meeussen, L., and Van Laar, C.: Perpetuating Inequality: Junior
Women Do Not See Queen Bee Behavior as Negative but Are Nonetheless
Negatively Affected by It, Front. Psychol., 9, 1690, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01690,
2018.
Subašić, E., Hardacre, S., Elton, B., Branscombe, N. R., Ryan, M. K.,
and Reynolds, K. J.: “We for She”: Mobilising men and women to act in
solidarity for gender equality, Group Process. Intergroup Relat., 21,
707–724, https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218763272, 2018.
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., and Hunter, B. A.: Sexism and Racism:
Old-Fashioned and Modern Prejudices, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 68,
199–214, https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199, 1995.
Tougas, F., Brown, R., Beaton, A. M., and Joly, S.: Neosexism: Plus Ça
Change, Plus C'est Pareil, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull., 21, 842–849,
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167295218007, 1995.
Troy, V.: Sexism in the Academy, n+1, (34), available at:
https://nplusonemag.com/issue-34/essays/sexism-in-the-academy/ (last access: 20
November, 2019.
Uhlmann, E. L. and Cohen, G. L.: “I think it, therefore it's true”:
Effects of self-perceived objectivity on hiring discrimination, Organ.
Behav. Hum. Decis. Process., 104, 207–223,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2007.07.001, 2007.
Ulvrova, M., Gérault, M., and Bocher, M.: Did this really happen? Female
researchers share their discrimination stories in comic strips, available at:
http://eper.elte.hu/index.php/2019/09/23/did-this-really-happen-woman-scientists-share-their-discrimination-stories-in-a-series-of-comic-strips/, last access: 20 November, 2019a.
Ulvrova, M., Adenis, A., Arnould, M., Bocher, M., Coltice, N., Gérault, M., and Mallard, C.: Promoting gender equality in academia through comic strips, Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 21, EGU2019-14644-2, 2019 EGU General Assembly 2019, available at: https://meetingorganizer.copernicus.org/EGU2019/EGU2019-14644-2.pdf (last access: 9 March 2020), 2019b.
Valian, V.: We are all complicit in harassment and abuse, Nature, 574, 7–7,
https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02944-3, 2019.
Vis mon job de géologue et chercheure au CNRS: Vis mon job de
géologue et chercheure au CNRS, available at:
https://forums.rockiemag.com/threads/vis-mon-job-de-geologue-et-chercheure-au-cnrs.821/, last access: 20 November, 2019.
Wadman, M.: A cold case, Science, 358, 162–165,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.358.6360.162, 2017.
Wadman, M.: Report details harassment by famed biologist, Science,
361, 316–317, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.361.6400.316, 2018.
Williams, J. C.: Bias Interrupters – Small Steps, Big Change, available at: https://biasinterrupters.org/, last access: 23 November, 2019.
Williams, J. C., Phillips, K. W., and Hall, E. V.: Double Jeopardy? Gender
Bias Against Women in Science, Worklife Law, available at:
https://worklifelaw.org/publication/double-jeopardy-gender-bias-against-women-of-color-in-science/
(last access: 19 November 2019), 2014.
WOMEESA: WOMEESA, available at: https://www.womeesa.net/, last access: 20 November, 2019.
Short summary
The "Did this really happen?!" project aims at publishing real-life, everyday sexism in the form of comic strips. Its major goal is to raise awareness about unconscious biases that transpire in everyday interactions in academia and increase the visibility of sexist situations that arise within the scientific community, especially to those who might not notice it. In this publication, we present the project and the different recurring sexist behaviours identified in the collected stories.
The "Did this really happen?!" project aims at publishing real-life, everyday sexism in the...
