23 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Global natural and anthropogenic methane emissions with approaches, potentials, economic costs, and social benefits of reductions: Review and outlook Z. Qi & R. Feng https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123568
2. Partitioning anthropogenic and natural methane emissions in Finland during 2000–2021 by combining bottom-up and top-down estimates M. Tenkanen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-25-2181-2025
3. Guiding urban water management towards 1.5 °C S. Parkinson https://doi.org/10.1038/s41545-021-00126-1
4. Comparing the Radiative Forcings of the Anthropogenic Aerosol Emissions From Chile and Mexico T. Miinalainen et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JD033364
5. Technical potentials and costs for reducing global anthropogenic methane emissions in the 2050 timeframe –results from the GAINS model L. Höglund-Isaksson et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7620/ab7457
6. A system dynamics-based scenario analysis of residential solid waste management in Kisumu, Kenya K. Dianati et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146200
7. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2017 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-13-2307-2021
8. The Global Methane Budget 2000–2017 M. Saunois et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1561-2020
9. The Future of Flash Graphene for the Sustainable Management of Solid Waste N. Barbhuiya et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c07571
10. The consolidated European synthesis of CH4 and N2O emissions for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990–2019 A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-15-1197-2023
11. European anthropogenic AFOLU greenhouse gas emissions: a review and benchmark data A. Petrescu et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-961-2020
12. Circulatory Pathways in the Water and Wastewater Sector in the Latin American Region P. Soto-Rios et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15061092
13. Towards greener polymers: Trends in the German chemical industry A. Franz et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.greenca.2024.02.002
14. Tracing the climate signal: mitigation of anthropogenic methane emissions can outweigh a large Arctic natural emission increase T. Christensen et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37719-9
15. The crucial role of circular waste management systems in cutting waste leakage into aquatic environments A. Gómez-Sanabria & F. Lindl https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-49555-9
16. Fossil-Fuel and Food Systems Equally Dominate Anthropogenic Methane Emissions in China S. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c07933
17. Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of co-combustion/pyrolysis of textile dyeing sludge and incense sticks: Regression and machine-learning models S. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.11.038
18. Efficiency hierarchy and optimization of waste incineration in China to balance disposal and energy supply J. Cui et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-026-69897-w
19. Data‐Driven Optimization of Agricultural Waste Adsorbents: Statistical Insights on Wastewater Treatment Efficiency A. Sholagberu et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/adce/8369021
20. Sustainable wastewater management in Indonesia's fish processing industry: Bringing governance into scenario analysis A. Gómez-Sanabria et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111241
21. Potential for future reductions of global GHG and air pollutants from circular waste management systems A. Gómez-Sanabria et al. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27624-7
22. Harnessing Waste for Emission Cuts: the Anaerobic Digestion Potential in Qatar S. Ghanimeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41748-025-00698-9
23. Innovative Heating for the Nano Age: Exploring the Potentials of Carbothermal Shock J. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.4c12350