13 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Regional gravity variations in Europe from superconducting gravimeters D. Crossley et al. 10.1016/j.jog.2004.07.014
2. Combination of temporal gravity variations resulting from superconducting gravimeter (SG) recordings, GRACE satellite observations and global hydrology models J. Neumeyer et al. 10.1007/s00190-005-0014-8
3. Measuring the effect of local water storage changes on in situ gravity observations: Case study of the Geodetic Observatory Wettzell, Germany B. Creutzfeldt et al. 10.1029/2009WR008359
4. Scientific achievements from the first phase (1997–2003) of the Global Geodynamics Project using a worldwide network of superconducting gravimeters J. Hinderer & D. Crossley 10.1016/j.jog.2004.07.019
5. Storage-discharge relationships at different catchment scales based on local high-precision gravimetry B. Creutzfeldt et al. 10.1002/hyp.9689
6. Long-term monitoring by absolute gravimetry: Tides to postglacial rebound A. Lambert et al. 10.1016/j.jog.2005.08.032
7. A Network of Superconducting Gravimeters Detects Submicrogal Coseismic Gravity Changes Y. Imanishi et al. 10.1126/science.1101875
8. GRACE‐derived terrestrial water storage depletion associated with the 2003 European heat wave O. Andersen et al. 10.1029/2005GL023574
9. Crustal vertical motion along a profile crossing the Rhine graben from the Vosges to the Black Forest Mountains: Results from absolute gravity, GPS and levelling observations M. Amalvict et al. 10.1016/j.jog.2005.08.036
10. Seasonal changes in the European gravity field from GRACE: A comparison with superconducting gravimeters and hydrology model predictions J. Hinderer et al. 10.1016/j.jog.2005.08.037
11. Preface to the Global Geodynamics Project D. Crossley 10.1016/j.jog.2004.07.002
12. The GHYRAF (Gravity and Hydrology in Africa) experiment: Description and first results J. Hinderer et al. 10.1016/j.jog.2009.09.014
13. A comparison of the gravity field over Central Europe from superconducting gravimeters, GRACE and global hydrological models, using EOF analysis D. Crossley et al. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2012.05404.x