88 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Accuracy analysis of geopotential coefficients recovered from in-situ disturbing potential by energy conservation method X. Zou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11806-007-0111-3
2. Degree-wise validation of satellite-only and combined Earth gravity models in the frame of an orbit propagation scheme applied to a short GOCE arc D. Tsoulis & T. Papanikolaou https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-013-0020-x
3. Research on the impact factors of GRACE precise orbit determination by dynamic method N. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2018-0008
4. A new approach of orbit determination for LEO satellites based on optical tracking of GEO satellites Y. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.023
5. CHAMP Gravity Field Recovery Using Kinematic Orbits T. XU & Y. YANG https://doi.org/10.1002/cjg2.656
6. A CHAMP‐only gravity field model from kinematic orbits using the energy integral C. Gerlach et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GL018025
7. Real-Time Precise Orbit Determination for LEO between Kinematic and Reduced-Dynamic with Ambiguity Resolution Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9010025
8. Assessment of Earth Gravity Field Models in the Medium to High Frequency Spectrum Based on GRACE and GOCE Dynamic Orbit Analysis T. Papanikolaou & D. Tsoulis https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8120441
9. Derivation of the CHAMP-only global gravity field model TUG-CHAMP04 applying the energy integral approach T. Badura et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-006-0002-3
10. GNSS visibility and performance implications for the GENESIS mission O. Montenbruck et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-023-01784-4
11. GRACE-FO gravity field recovery from integer ambiguity resolved kinematic orbits and decorrelated stochastic model G. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.10.095
12. Centimeter-Level Orbit Determination of GRACE-C Using IGS-RTS Data D. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15071832
13. Efficient LEO Dynamic Orbit Determination with Triple Differenced GPS Carrier Phases T. Bae et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0373463307004171
14. Precise orbit determination of LEO satellites: a systematic review K. Selvan et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-023-01520-7
15. Orbit determination for the GOCE satellite P. Visser et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2008.09.016
16. Initial orbit determination of BDS-3 satellites based on new code signals F. Ye et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2018.06.002
17. Zero-difference and single-difference precise orbit determination for LEO using GPS D. Peng & B. Wu https://doi.org/10.1007/s11434-007-0264-3
18. Evaluation of global gravity models from absolute gravity and vertical gravity gradient measurements in Turkey Y. Akdoğan et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ab2f1c
19. Modeling Orbit Dynamics of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC Satellites for Recovery of Temporal Gravity Variations C. Hwang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2004789
20. Reduced Dynamic Orbit Determination Using Differenced Phase in Adjacent Epochs for Spaceborne Dual-frequency GPS D. GU & D. YI https://doi.org/10.1016/S1000-9361(11)60093-9
21. A strategy to determine GRACE-FO kinematic orbit during the activation of flex power G. Meng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-025-01828-6
22. Kinematic positioning of LEO and GPS satellites and IGS stations on the ground D. Švehla & M. Rothacher https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.04.066
23. Quality assessment of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC and GRACE GPS observables: analysis of multipath, ionospheric delay and phase residual in orbit determination C. Hwang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0145-0
24. Gross Error Compensation for Gravity Field Analysis Based on Kinematic Orbit Data M. Götzelmann et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0061-9
25. Comparison of the real-time precise orbit determination for LEO between kinematic and reduced-dynamic modes Z. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.110224
26. GPS-based precise orbit determination of Low Earth Orbiters with limited resources A. Mander & S. Bisnath https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0303-7
27. A new ambiguity resolution method for LEO precise orbit determination X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-022-01629-6
28. Research on Tracking Method of Space Target Based on Interacting Multiple Models K. Hu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2012.01.380
29. Estimation of SLR station coordinates by means of SLR measurements to kinematic orbit of LEO satellites J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-018-0973-7
30. Integrated precise orbit determination of GPS and LEO satellites with an optimized integer ambiguity resolution strategy: multiple baselines with soft constraints Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2026.121391
31. Analysis of GPS radio occultation data from the FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC and Metop/GRAS missions at CDAAC W. Schreiner et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-4-2255-2011
32. Satellite orbit determination using quantum correlation technology B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-018-0129-y
33. Dilution of precision for LEO satellite precise orbit and clock determination J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2025.07.061
34. Reducing influence of gravity model error in precise orbit determination of low Earth orbit satellites J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11806-007-0055-7
35. Dynamic orbit parameterization and assessment in the frame of current GOCE gravity models T. Papanikolaou & D. Tsoulis https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pepi.2014.08.003
36. The improvement of BDS Observation Geometry with LEO constellations in Orbit Determination Y. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109228
37. Reduced-Dynamic Precise Orbit Determination of Haiyang-2B Altimetry Satellite Using a Refined Empirical Acceleration Model Y. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13183702
38. Reduced-Dynamic Orbit Determination of Low-Orbit Satellites Taking into Account GNSS Attitude Errors L. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18020373
39. On precise orbit determination of HY-2 with space geodetic techniques J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-012-0095-8
40. Sentinel-1A – First precise orbit determination results H. Peter et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.05.034
41. Enhancing the kinematic precise orbit determination of low earth orbiters using GPS receiver clock modelling Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2014.07.016
42. Precise Orbit Determination of LEO Satellites Based on Undifferenced GNSS Observations A. Allahvirdi-Zadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)SU.1943-5428.0000382
43. Assessment of Swarm Kinematic Orbit Determination Using Two Different Double-Difference Methods R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15102669
44. Fast Time Synchronization on Tens of Picoseconds Level Using Uncombined GNSS Carrier Phase of Zero/Short Baseline Y. Zhao et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20174882
45. Research on Sliding-Window Batch Processing Orbit Determination Algorithm for Satellite-to-Satellite Tracking Y. Xu et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12080662
46. Precise orbit determination of the Sentinel-3A altimetry satellite using ambiguity-fixed GPS carrier phase observations O. Montenbruck et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-017-1090-2
47. On Satellite-Borne GPS Data Quality and Reduced-Dynamic Precise Orbit Determination of HY-2C: A Case of Orbit Validation with Onboard DORIS Data H. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214329
48. Kinematic orbit determination for BDS-3 satellites with inter-satellite link data C. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2026.01.015
49. Precise Orbit Determination for LEO Satellites With Ambiguity Resolution: Improvement and Comparison K. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JB022491
50. Highly-reduced dynamic orbits and their use for global gravity field recovery: A simulation study for GOCE A. Jäggi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11200-008-0025-z
51. PPP-based Swarm kinematic orbit determination L. Ren & S. Schön https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-36-1227-2018
52. On simulation of precise orbit determination of HY-2 with centimeter precision based on satellite-borne GPS technique J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-012-0319-3
53. GSTAR: an innovative software platform for processing space geodetic data at the observation level C. Shi et al. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-023-00109-2
54. Real-Time Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination for LEO Satellites Using Zero-Differenced Ambiguity Resolution X. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11232815
55. A Near-Real-Time Automatic Orbit Determination System for COSMIC and Its Follow-On Satellite Mission: Analysis of Orbit and Clock Errors on Radio Occultation Y. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2013.2271547
56. A Novel Method for Improving LEO Kinematic Real-Time Precise Orbit Determination With Neural Networks W. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIM.2024.3427853
57. Estimating the uncertainty of using GPS radio occultation data for climate monitoring: Intercomparison of CHAMP refractivity climate records from 2002 to 2006 from different data centers S. Ho et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2009JD011969
58. Enhancing LEO orbit determination and prediction through constraints on atmospheric drag scale factor H. She et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-025-01848-2
59. Undifferenced Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination of Swarm and GRACE-FO Satellites from GNSS Observations P. Luo et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22031071
60. Pseudo-Stochastic Orbit Modeling Techniques for Low-Earth Orbiters A. Jäggi et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-006-0029-9
61. Phase residuals analysis in kinematic orbit determination of GRACE-FO R. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2024.11.008
62. Effect of PCV and attitude on the precise orbit determination of Jason-3 satellite K. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2021-0052
63. GPS Based Reduced-Dynamic Orbit Determination for Low Earth Orbiters with Ambiguity Fixing Y. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/723414
64. Comparison of precise orbit determination methods of zero-difference kinematic, dynamic and reduced-dynamic of GRACE-A satellite using SHORDE software K. Li et al. https://doi.org/10.1515/jag-2017-0004
65. Improving extended Kalman filter algorithm in satellite autonomous navigation L. He et al. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410016641708
66. PCO and hardware delay calibration for LEO satellite antenna downlinking navigation signals J. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad48a2
67. Improved GRACE kinematic orbit determination using GPS receiver clock modeling U. Weinbach & S. Schön https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-012-0297-1
68. Orbit determination using real tracking data from FY3C-GNOS C. Xiong et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2017.04.013
69. Quality assessment of COSMIC/FORMOSAT-3 GPS radio occultation data derived from single- and double-difference atmospheric excess phase processing W. Schreiner et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-009-0132-5
70. Partial Ambiguity Resolution for Ground and Space-Based Applications in a GPS+Galileo scenario: A simulation study A. Nardo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2015.09.002
71. Improved kHz-SLR tracking techniques and orbit quality analysis for LEO missions W. Hausleitner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2009.11.016
72. Improving the GRACE Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination Through Modified Clock Estimating X. Zhou et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19194347
73. In-flight performance analysis of the navigation augmentation payload on LEO communication satellite: a preliminary study on WT01 mission Z. Wu et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2021.2010505
74. Assessment of numerical integration methods in the context of low Earth orbits and inter-satellite observation analysis T. Papanikolaou & D. Tsoulis https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-016-0159-3
75. Analysis on motion of Earth’s center of mass observed with CHAMP mission J. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-008-0152-0
76. Determination of Seasonal Variations of Low-Degree Earth Gravity Field from CHAMP Geometric Orbits X. Liu et al. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.90-93.2864
77. Real-time navigation solutions of low-cost off-the-shelf GNSS receivers on board the Astrocast constellation satellites L. Müller et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2023.10.001
78. GOCE Gravity Field Processing Strategy R. Pail & G. Plank https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SGEG.0000020834.28615.0d
79. Precise orbit determination and accuracy analysis of HY-2A satellite using DORIS Doppler data Q. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-014-0066-4
80. Centimeter-level precise orbit determination for the HY-2A satellite using DORIS and SLR tracking data Q. Kong et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-016-0001-x
81. Assessing antenna field of view and receiver clocks of COSMIC and GRACE satellites: lessons for COSMIC-2 T. Tseng et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-013-0323-y
82. Precise Orbit Solution for Swarm Using Space-Borne GPS Data and Optimized Pseudo-Stochastic Pulses B. Zhang et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17030635
83. Stepwise autonomous orbit determination of large LEO constellations by GNSS observations with partial inter-satellite ranging Y. Yang & X. Song https://doi.org/10.1186/s43020-025-00160-1
84. Assessing attitude error of FORMOSAT-3/COSMIC satellites and its impact on orbit determination T. Tseng et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2012.02.007
85. Zero-Reconvergence PPP for Real-Time Low-Earth Satellite Orbit Determination in Case of Data Interruption H. Ge et al. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2024.3362395
86. A Second-Order Time-Difference Position Constrained Reduced-Dynamic Technique for the Precise Orbit Determination of LEOs Using GPS H. Wei et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13153033
87. Comprehensive Analysis of HY-2B/2C/2D Satellite-Borne GPS Data Quality and Reduced-Dynamic Precise Orbit Determination X. Jin et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12020102
88. POD of small LEO satellites based on precise real-time MADOCA and SBAS-aided PPP corrections A. Allahvirdi-Zadeh et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10291-020-01078-8