Articles | Volume 5
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-83-2005
© Author(s) 2005. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-83-2005
© Author(s) 2005. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
16 Dec 2005
Investigation of the transferability of hydrological models and a method to improve model calibration
G. Hartmann
IWS, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany
A. Bárdossy
IWS, Universität Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 61, 70550 Stuttgart, Germany
Viewed
Total article views: 2,254 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
Cumulative views and downloads
(calculated since 01 Feb 2013)
| HTML | XML | Total | BibTeX | EndNote | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,210 | 913 | 131 | 2,254 | 163 | 209 |
- HTML: 1,210
- PDF: 913
- XML: 131
- Total: 2,254
- BibTeX: 163
- EndNote: 209
Cited
35 citations as recorded by crossref.
- On the correlation between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration climate change signals for hydrological impact analyses J. De Niel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1587615
- Time-varying hydrological simulation based on a SWD-SSC method J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101808
- Analyzing catchment behavior through catchment modeling in the Gilgel Abay, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia S. Uhlenbrook et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2153-2010
- A multi-catchment evaluation of hydrological model transferability and ensemble averaging under contrasting hydroclimatic conditions in Iran A. Jahanshahi & M. Booij https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2026.135878
- The comprehensive differential split-sample test: A stress-test for hydrological model robustness under climate variability D. Motavita et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.054
- Why does a conceptual hydrological model fail to correctly predict discharge changes in response to climate change? D. Duethmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3493-2020
- The robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling under climate variability – A review H. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129666
- Hydrological model skills change with drought severity; insights from multi-variable evaluation G. Bruno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131023
- Improved Rainfall‐Runoff Calibration for Drying Climate: Choice of Objective Function K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022466
- On the use of multi-objective optimization for multi-site calibration of extensive green roofs E. Abdalla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116716
- Usefulness of Global Root Zone Soil Moisture Product for Streamflow Prediction of Ungauged Basins J. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040756
- Accounting for the influence of vegetation and landscape improves model transferability in a tropical savannah region H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019574
- Sensitivity of discharge projections to potential evapotranspiration estimation in Northern Tunisia H. Dakhlaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01615-8
- Choosing an arbitrary calibration period for hydrologic models: How much does it influence water balance simulations? D. Myers et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14045
- Testing for the transferability of a water quality model to areas of similar spatial and temporal scale based on an uncertainty vs. complexity hypothesis K. Lindenschmidt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2006.05.002
- Exploration of sub-annual calibration schemes of hydrological models K. Kim & D. Han https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.296
- On the Robustness of Conceptual Rainfall‐Runoff Models to Calibration and Evaluation Data Set Splits Selection: A Large Sample Investigation D. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026752
- Assessing rainfall-runoff models for climate change: simple and differential split-sample tests for conceptual and artificial intelligence models N. Behfar et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2345151
- Evaluating the transferability of monthly water balance models under changing climate conditions Ž. Topalović et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1725238
- On Lack of Robustness in Hydrological Model Development Due to Absence of Guidelines for Selecting Calibration and Evaluation Data: Demonstration for Data‐Driven Models F. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021470
- Evaluating the robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under climate variability in northern Tunisia H. Dakhlaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.032
- Quantifying the Uncertainty Created by Non‐Transferable Model Calibrations Across Climate and Land Cover Scenarios: A Case Study With SWMM A. Sytsma et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031603
- Incorporating uncertainty in hydrological predictions for gauged and ungauged basins in southern Africa E. Kapangaziwiri et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.690881
- An approach to identify time consistent model parameters: sub-period calibration S. Gharari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-149-2013
- On the lack of robustness of hydrologic models regarding water balance simulation: a diagnostic approach applied to three models of increasing complexity on 20 mountainous catchments L. Coron et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-727-2014
- Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods C. Broderick et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018850
- Is Past Variability a Suitable Proxy for Future Change? A Virtual Catchment Experiment C. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026275
- Is ET often oversimplified in hydrologic models? Using long records to elucidate unaccounted for controls on ET C. Kelleher & S. Shaw https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.018
- Improving the hydrological consistency of a process-based solute-transport model by simultaneous calibration of streamflow and stream concentrations J. Salmon-Monviola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-127-2025
- Assessing the role of uncertain precipitation estimates on the robustness of hydrological model parameters under highly variable climate conditions B. Bisselink et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.09.003
- A bootstrap-based differential split-sample test to assess the transferability of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under past and future climate variability H. Dakhlaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.056
- Exploring Climate Sensitivity in Hydrological Model Calibration J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234094
- Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: Revisiting an apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018068
- Impact of evapotranspiration process representation on runoff projections from conceptual rainfall‐runoff models D. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019627
- Inductive predictions of hydrologic events using a Long Short-Term Memory network and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool N. Majeske et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105400
Latest update: 08 Sep 2026
