34 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. On the correlation between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration climate change signals for hydrological impact analyses J. De Niel et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1587615
2. Time-varying hydrological simulation based on a SWD-SSC method J. Wang et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2024.101808
3. Analyzing catchment behavior through catchment modeling in the Gilgel Abay, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia S. Uhlenbrook et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-2153-2010
4. The comprehensive differential split-sample test: A stress-test for hydrological model robustness under climate variability D. Motavita et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.054
5. Why does a conceptual hydrological model fail to correctly predict discharge changes in response to climate change? D. Duethmann et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-24-3493-2020
6. The robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling under climate variability – A review H. Ji et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2023.129666
7. Hydrological model skills change with drought severity; insights from multi-variable evaluation G. Bruno et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.131023
8. Improved Rainfall‐Runoff Calibration for Drying Climate: Choice of Objective Function K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2017WR022466
9. On the use of multi-objective optimization for multi-site calibration of extensive green roofs E. Abdalla et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116716
10. Usefulness of Global Root Zone Soil Moisture Product for Streamflow Prediction of Ungauged Basins J. Choi et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13040756
11. Accounting for the influence of vegetation and landscape improves model transferability in a tropical savannah region H. Gao et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019574
12. Sensitivity of discharge projections to potential evapotranspiration estimation in Northern Tunisia H. Dakhlaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-020-01615-8
13. Choosing an arbitrary calibration period for hydrologic models: How much does it influence water balance simulations? D. Myers et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.14045
14. Testing for the transferability of a water quality model to areas of similar spatial and temporal scale based on an uncertainty vs. complexity hypothesis K. Lindenschmidt https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2006.05.002
15. Exploration of sub-annual calibration schemes of hydrological models K. Kim & D. Han https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2016.296
16. On the Robustness of Conceptual Rainfall‐Runoff Models to Calibration and Evaluation Data Set Splits Selection: A Large Sample Investigation D. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026752
17. Assessing rainfall-runoff models for climate change: simple and differential split-sample tests for conceptual and artificial intelligence models N. Behfar et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2024.2345151
18. Evaluating the transferability of monthly water balance models under changing climate conditions Ž. Topalović et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2020.1725238
19. On Lack of Robustness in Hydrological Model Development Due to Absence of Guidelines for Selecting Calibration and Evaluation Data: Demonstration for Data‐Driven Models F. Zheng et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021470
20. Evaluating the robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under climate variability in northern Tunisia H. Dakhlaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.032
21. Quantifying the Uncertainty Created by Non‐Transferable Model Calibrations Across Climate and Land Cover Scenarios: A Case Study With SWMM A. Sytsma et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR031603
22. Incorporating uncertainty in hydrological predictions for gauged and ungauged basins in southern Africa E. Kapangaziwiri et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2012.690881
23. An approach to identify time consistent model parameters: sub-period calibration S. Gharari et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-149-2013
24. On the lack of robustness of hydrologic models regarding water balance simulation: a diagnostic approach applied to three models of increasing complexity on 20 mountainous catchments L. Coron et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-727-2014
25. Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods C. Broderick et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018850
26. Is Past Variability a Suitable Proxy for Future Change? A Virtual Catchment Experiment C. Stephens et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026275
27. Is ET often oversimplified in hydrologic models? Using long records to elucidate unaccounted for controls on ET C. Kelleher & S. Shaw https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.12.018
28. Improving the hydrological consistency of a process-based solute-transport model by simultaneous calibration of streamflow and stream concentrations J. Salmon-Monviola et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-29-127-2025
29. Assessing the role of uncertain precipitation estimates on the robustness of hydrological model parameters under highly variable climate conditions B. Bisselink et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2016.09.003
30. A bootstrap-based differential split-sample test to assess the transferability of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under past and future climate variability H. Dakhlaoui et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.056
31. Exploring Climate Sensitivity in Hydrological Model Calibration J. Lee et al. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15234094
32. Simulating runoff under changing climatic conditions: Revisiting an apparent deficiency of conceptual rainfall‐runoff models K. Fowler et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018068
33. Impact of evapotranspiration process representation on runoff projections from conceptual rainfall‐runoff models D. Guo et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR019627
34. Inductive predictions of hydrologic events using a Long Short-Term Memory network and the Soil and Water Assessment Tool N. Majeske et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105400