Deployment of Renewable Energies in Germany: Spatial Principles and their Practical Implications Based on a GIS-Tool
Stephan Bosch
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Institute of Geography, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, 86159,
Germany
Joachim Rathmann
Institute of Geography and Geology, University of Würzburg,
Würzburg, 97074, Germany
Related authors
Stephan Bosch and Dominik Kienmoser
Geogr. Helv., 77, 523–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-523-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-523-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We modelled potential regional energy landscapes that can be derived from the two-degree target and visualised them based on Geographical Information Systems by using five scenarios involving changes to the planning guidelines. The analyses reveal that the development of a carbon-neutral energy system is possible. Yet the potential spatial patterns of renewable energies differ considerably.
Stephan Bosch and Matthias Schmidt
Geogr. Helv., 75, 235–251, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-235-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-235-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The study analyses the social dimensions of energy landscapes. Furthermore, it will be discussed whether and how energy landscapes can be distinguished from other landscapes. It becomes clear that infrastructure measures for climate protection only appear socially viable if the production of sustainable energy landscapes is understood as the production of a discourse about sustainability, equality, and justice.
Stephan Bosch, Joachim Rathmann, and Lucas Schwarz
Adv. Geosci., 49, 19–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-19-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-19-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of the study is to identify the essential parameters of a sustainable expansion of renewable energies from the diversity of potential influencing factors and to illustrate them based on a regional case study. The analyses reveal the great regional assertiveness of photovoltaics, whereby wind energy can assert itself due to social parameters also at some locations, particularly in the central part of the study area, against the economically often better positioned photovoltaics.
Stephan Bosch, Joachim Rathmann, and Florian Simetsreiter
Geogr. Helv., 71, 29–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-29-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-29-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
By now, there are numerous high-quality studies discussing the incompatibility of the development of renewable energies with the preservation of landscape. However, no further insight is provided as to how a holistic spatial integration of renewable energies may be achieved. Therefore, this study aims to critically investigate the currently established paradigm of site planning for renewable energies using GIS analysis.
Stephan Bosch and Dominik Kienmoser
Geogr. Helv., 77, 523–546, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-523-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-77-523-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
We modelled potential regional energy landscapes that can be derived from the two-degree target and visualised them based on Geographical Information Systems by using five scenarios involving changes to the planning guidelines. The analyses reveal that the development of a carbon-neutral energy system is possible. Yet the potential spatial patterns of renewable energies differ considerably.
Stephan Bosch and Matthias Schmidt
Geogr. Helv., 75, 235–251, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-235-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-235-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
The study analyses the social dimensions of energy landscapes. Furthermore, it will be discussed whether and how energy landscapes can be distinguished from other landscapes. It becomes clear that infrastructure measures for climate protection only appear socially viable if the production of sustainable energy landscapes is understood as the production of a discourse about sustainability, equality, and justice.
Stephan Bosch, Joachim Rathmann, and Lucas Schwarz
Adv. Geosci., 49, 19–29, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-19-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-19-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The aim of the study is to identify the essential parameters of a sustainable expansion of renewable energies from the diversity of potential influencing factors and to illustrate them based on a regional case study. The analyses reveal the great regional assertiveness of photovoltaics, whereby wind energy can assert itself due to social parameters also at some locations, particularly in the central part of the study area, against the economically often better positioned photovoltaics.
Stephan Bosch, Joachim Rathmann, and Florian Simetsreiter
Geogr. Helv., 71, 29–45, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-29-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-29-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
By now, there are numerous high-quality studies discussing the incompatibility of the development of renewable energies with the preservation of landscape. However, no further insight is provided as to how a holistic spatial integration of renewable energies may be achieved. Therefore, this study aims to critically investigate the currently established paradigm of site planning for renewable energies using GIS analysis.
Cited articles
Aitken, M.: Why we still don't understand the social aspects of wind power:
A critique of key assumptions within the literature, Energ. Policy,
38, 1834–1841, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.060, 2010.
Bhowmik, C., Bhowmik, S., Ray, A., and Pandey, K. M.: Optimal green energy
planning for sustainable development: a review, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 71, 796–813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.105, 2017.
Blaschke, T., Biberacher, M., Gadocha, S., and Schardinger, I.: Energy
landscapes: Meeting energy demands and human aspirations, Biomass. Bioenerg., 55, 3–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.11.022, 2013.
Bosch, S., Rathmann, J., and Simetsreiter, F.: Raumverträglicher Ausbau
von erneuerbaren Energien – ein alternativer Standortplanungsansatz für eine
nachhaltige Energiewende, Geogr. Helv., 71, 29-45,
https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-71-29-2016, 2016.
Calvert, K., Pearce, J., and Mabee, W. E.: Toward renewable energy
geo-information infrastructures: Applications of GIS and remote sensing that
build institutional capacity, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev.,
18, 416–429, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.024, 2013.
Cowell, R.: Wind power, landscape and strategic, spatial planning – The
construction of “acceptable locations” in Wales, Land Use Policy, 27,
222–232, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.006, 2010.
Devine-Wright, P.: Beyond NIMBYism: towards and integrated framework for
understanding public perceptions of wind energy, Wind Energy, 8,
125–139, https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124, 2005.
Einig, K. and Zaspel-Heisters, B.: Eine Bilanz der Steuerung der
Windenergienutzung durch die Raumordnung nach Fukushima, in: Informationen
zur Raumentwicklung, Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und
Raumforschung, Bonn, 6, 571–589, 2015.
Ellis, G., Barry, J., and Robinson, C.: Many ways to say “no”, different
ways to say “yes”: applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of
wind farm proposals, J. Environ. Plann. Man., 50,
517–551, https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701402075, 2007.
Fripp, M.: Switch: A planning tool for power systems with large shares of
intermittent renewable energy, Environ. Sci. Technol.,
46, 6371–6378, https://doi.org/doi:10.1021/es204645c, 2012.
Grassi, S., Chokani, N., and Abhari, R. S.: Large scale technical and
economical assessment of wind energy potential with a GIS tool: Case study
Iowa, Energ. Policy, 45, 73–85, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.01.061, 2012.
Höfer, T., Sunak, Y., Siddique, H., and Madlener, R.: Wind farm siting
using a spatial analytic hierarchy process approach: A case study of the
Städteregion Aachen, Appl. Energ., 163, 222–243, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.138, 2016.
Lambin, E. F. and Geist, H. J. (Eds.): Land-use and land-cover change: Local
processes and global impacts, Global Change – The IGBP Series, Springer,
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, 2006.
Murdoch, J.: Space against time: competing rationalities in planning for
housing, T. I. Brit. Geogr., 25,
503–519, 2000.
Omitaomu, O. A., Blevins, B. R., Jochem, W. C., Mays, G. T., Belles, R.,
Hadley, S. W., Harrison, T. J., Bhaduri, B. L., Neish, B. S., and Rose, A.
N.: Adapting a GIS-based multicriteria decision analysis approach for
evaluating new power generating sites, Appl. Energ., 96, 292–301,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.11.087, 2012.
Palmas, C., Siewert, A., and von Haaren, C.: Exploring the decision-space for
renewable energy generation to enhance spatial efficiency, Environ. Impact Assess., 52, 9–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.06.005, 2015.
Pasqualetti, M. J.: Opposing wind energy landscapes: A search for common
cause, in: The new Geographies of Energy. Assessment and Analysis of
Critical Landscapes, edited by: Zimmerer, K., Routledge, New York, 206–216, https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2011.568879, 2013.
Quinonez-Varela, G., Cruden, A., Graham, C., Punton, B., Blair, L., and
Thomson, J.: A GIS/PSS planning tool for the initial grid connection
assessment of renewable generation, Renew. Energ., 32, 727–737,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.03.011, 2007.
Resch, B., Sagl, G., Törnros, T., Bachmaier, A., Eggers, J.-B., Herkel,
S., Narmsara, S., and Gündra, H.: GIS-based planning and modeling for
renewable energy: Challenges and future research avenues, ISPRS Int. Geo-Inf., 3, 662–692, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi3020662, 2014.
Sunak, Y., Höfer, T., Siddique, H., Madlener, R., and De Doncker, R. W.:
A GIS-based decision support system for the optimal siting of wind farm
projects, E.ON Energy Research Center Series, 7, 1–64, 2015.
Tegou, L. I., Polatidis, H., and Haralambopoulos, D. A.: Environmental
management framework for wind farm siting: methodology and case study, Environ. Manage., 91, 2134–2147, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.05.010, 2010.
Tiba, C., Candeias, A. L. B., Fraidenraich, N., Barbosa, E. M. de S.,
de Carvalho Neto, P. B., and de Melo Filho, J. B.: A GIS-based decision
support tool for renewable energy management and planning in semi-arid rural
environments of northeast of Brazil, Renew. Energ., 35,
2921–2932, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2010.05.009, 2010.
Upreti, B. R. and van der Horst, D.: National renewable energy policy and
local opposition in the UK: the failed development of a biomass electricity
plant, Biomass. Bioenerg., 26, 61–69, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00099-0, 2004.
Warren, C. R. and McFadyen, M.: Does community ownership affect public
attitudes to wind energy? A case study from South-West Scotland, Land Use
Policy, 27, 204–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.12.010, 2010.
Zoellner, J., Schweizer-Ries, P., and Wemheuer, C.: Public acceptance of
renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany, Energ. Policy,
36, 4136–4141, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.026, 2008.
Short summary
The study discusses the fundamental criticism of a techno-economic oriented and target-deterministic energy planning by GIS. Proceeding from this, more complex approaches to the integration of social perspectives into GIS-planning tools are exemplified. The essential innovation integrated into the GIS-tool is the potential to quickly change economic, ecological and social parameters; thus, maps of the spatial dynamics of renewable energy site planning can easily be calculated.
The study discusses the fundamental criticism of a techno-economic oriented and...