26 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. A novel paradigm for integrating physics-based numerical and machine learning models: A case study of eco-hydrological model C. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105669
2. Position paper: Open web-distributed integrated geographic modelling and simulation to enable broader participation and applications M. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103223
3. Trans‐Disciplinary Soil Physics Research Critical to Synthesis and Modeling of Agricultural Systems L. Ahuja et al. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0207
4. Open data and model integration through generic model agent toolkit in CyberWater framework R. Chen et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2022.105384
5. Model integration and the role of data A. Voinov & C. Cerco https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.02.005
6. Environmental modeling framework invasiveness: Analysis and implications W. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.03.011
7. A software engineering perspective on environmental modeling framework design: The Object Modeling System O. David et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.03.006
8. Applications of Linked and Nonlinked Complex Models for TMDL Development: Approaches and Challenges Y. Mohamoud & H. Zhang https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001721
9. A generic approach for developing process-level hydrologic modeling components A. Castronova & J. Goodall https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.01.003
10. Whole-System Integration and Modeling Essential to Agricultural Science and Technology for the 21st Century L. Ahuja et al. https://doi.org/10.1300/J411v19n01_04
11. Prototyping an open environment for sharing geographical analysis models on cloud computing platform Y. Wen et al. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2012.716861
12. Integrated environmental modeling: A vision and roadmap for the future G. Laniak et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.09.006
13. Evaluating uncertainty in integrated environmental models: A review of concepts and tools L. Matott et al. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007301
14. Mathematical Modelling for the Integrated Management of Water Resources in Hydrological Basins H. Silva-Hidalgo et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9296-y
15. ‘Integronsters’, integral and integrated modeling A. Voinov & H. Shugart https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2012.05.014
16. Design of a component-based integrated environmental modeling framework G. Whelan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.016
17. PEMIP: Post-fire erosion model inter-comparison project S. Kampf et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110704
18. Tool for Searching USEPA’s TMDL Reports Repository to Analyze TMDL Modeling State of the Practice N. Quinn et al. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001805
19. An open-data open-model framework for hydrological models’ integration, evaluation and application D. Salas et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2020.104622
20. The Conservation Effects Assessment Project benchmark watersheds: Synthesis of preliminary findings C. Richardson et al. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.63.6.590
21. A data description model for reusing, sharing and integrating geo-analysis models S. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-4270-5
22. Opportunities for Increasing Utility of Models for Rangeland Management J. Derner et al. https://doi.org/10.2111/REM-D-11-00122.1
23. Performance implications of multi-tier application deployments on Infrastructure-as-a-Service clouds: Towards performance modeling W. Lloyd et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2012.12.007
24. Integrated environmental modelling: achieving the vision R. Moore & A. Hughes https://doi.org/10.1144/SP408.12
25. Simulation of Snowmelt and Runoff Based on Component in Northwest of China L. Yang et al. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJSSH.2014.V4.340
26. Ad Hoc Modeling in Agronomy: What Have We Learned in the Last 15 Years? F. Affholder et al. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0376