Journal cover Journal topic
Advances in Geosciences An open-access journal for refereed proceedings and special publications
Journal topic

Journal metrics

CiteScore value: 2.0
CiteScore
2.0
SNIP value: 0.753
SNIP0.753
IPP value: 1.58
IPP1.58
SJR value: 0.478
SJR0.478
Scimago H <br class='widget-line-break'>index value: 37
Scimago H
index
37
h5-index value: 12
h5-index12
Volume 6
Adv. Geosci., 6, 211–216, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-6-211-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.
Adv. Geosci., 6, 211–216, 2006
https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-6-211-2006
© Author(s) 2006. This work is licensed under
the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 2.5 License.

  14 Feb 2006

14 Feb 2006

From inferential statistics to climate knowledge

A. de H. N. Maia1 and H. Meinke2 A. de H. N. Maia and H. Meinke
  • 1Embrapa Meio Ambiente, PO Box 69, Jaguariúna, SP, Brazil
  • 2Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Emerging Technologies, PO Box 102, Toowoomba, Qld 4350, Australia

Abstract. Climate variability and change are risk factors for climate sensitive activities such as agriculture. Managing these risks requires "climate knowledge", i.e. a sound understanding of causes and consequences of climate variability and knowledge of potential management options that are suitable in light of the climatic risks posed. Often such information about prognostic variables (e.g. yield, rainfall, run-off) is provided in probabilistic terms (e.g. via cumulative distribution functions, CDF), whereby the quantitative assessments of these alternative management options is based on such CDFs. Sound statistical approaches are needed in order to assess whether difference between such CDFs are intrinsic features of systems dynamics or chance events (i.e. quantifying evidences against an appropriate null hypothesis). Statistical procedures that rely on such a hypothesis testing framework are referred to as "inferential statistics" in contrast to descriptive statistics (e.g. mean, median, variance of population samples, skill scores). Here we report on the extension of some of the existing inferential techniques that provides more relevant and adequate information for decision making under uncertainty.

Download
Citation