<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0">
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ADGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Advances in Geosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ADGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Adv. Geosci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7359</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/adgeo-49-187-2019</article-id><title-group><article-title>Storm Tilo over Europe in November 2007: storm surge and impacts on
societal and energy infrastructure</article-title><alt-title>Storm Tilo over Europe in November 2007</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Storm Tilo over Europe in November~2007}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{A.~J.~Kettle}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes">
          <name><surname>Kettle</surname><given-names>Anthony James</given-names></name>
          <email>ake3358@gmail.com</email>
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Department of Geography, Maynooth University, Maynooth, Co. Kildare, Ireland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Anthony James Kettle (ake3358@gmail.com)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>4</day><month>November</month><year>2019</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>49</volume>
      <fpage>187</fpage><lpage>196</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>27</day><month>May</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>27</day><month>August</month><year>2019</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>12</day><month>September</month><year>2019</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        <copyright-statement>Copyright: © 2019 Anthony James Kettle</copyright-statement>
        <copyright-year>2019</copyright-year>
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019.html">This article is available from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract><title>Abstract</title>
    <p id="d1e72">Storm Tilo on 8–9 November 2007 ranks among the serious
winter storms in northern Europe over the past 30 years. Its low pressure
centre passed across the northern North Sea, and this led to a cold air
outbreak in northwest Europe. Strong north winds across the North Sea
contributed to a high storm surge that was serious for coastal regions in
eastern England, the Netherlands and Germany. Storm winds and unusually high
waves caused shipping accidents and damage to some offshore energy
infrastructure. This report presents an outline of the met-ocean conditions
and a short overview of storm impacts on societal and energy infrastructure.
The progress of the storm surge around the North Sea is analysed using data
from the national tide gauge networks. A spectral analysis of the water
level data is used to isolate the long period storm surge and short period
oscillations (i.e., <inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4.8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) from the tidal signal. The calculated
skew surge is compared with literature reports for this storm and also with
another serious North Sea storm from 31 October–1 November 2006 (Storm
Britta). The short period oscillations are compared with the platform and
shipping incident reports for the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storm period. The results support
previous reports of unusual wave and water level dynamics during some severe
regional winter storms.</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <label>1</label><title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e110">Winter storms in northern Europe are a potentially serious hazard that can
interrupt and damage societal and energy infrastructure. Northwest Europe
has been impacted by a higher frequency of damaging winter wind storms
starting about the late 1980s that have resulted in high insurance losses
(Berz, 2005). While some of this may be due to the increased construction of
infrastructure in exposed locations, there is evidence that the storms have
also become larger and more intense. One special type of winter storm,
typically passing on an eastward trajectory across the northern North Sea is
serious for coastal and offshore infrastructure in Europe from its
associated storm surge and wave field. Although not typically ranked with
the highest insurance losses, this type of maritime storm is serious for
energy infrastructure around the North Sea, including offshore petroleum
platforms, wind energy infrastructure, and coastal power plants.</p>
      <p id="d1e113">Coastal flooding during storms represents a potentially serious hazard for
energy infrastructure, and this issue has been highlighted by Paskal (2009)
and Cruz and Krausmann (2013) especially with scenarios of future sea level
rise. Paskal (2009) presents an overview of the threat of storm surge
flooding of coastal nuclear power stations, and there have been two notable
cases in Europe. On 13 December 1981 the nuclear power plant at Hinkley
Point in the Bristol Channel of the southwest England was shut down as the
result of coastal flooding during an intense storm whose low pressure centre
passed across southern Wales on an eastward track (Flather et al., 1982;
Kirby, 2010). On 27 December 1999 the Le Blayais nuclear power station in
the Gironde estuary of western France was forced to shut down as the result
of seawater flooding caused by a breach of dyke defences by the combined
action of a sea surge and high waves during an intense storm (Salomon, 2002;
de Fraguier, 2010). For both events but particularly at Le Blayais, the
action of the wave field on the sea walls may have been important for the
ultimate flooding event. However, a complete geophysical analysis of the
events has been limited by the lack of water level and wave data, in part
due to failures of the tide gauge recorders. These accidents highlight that
extreme coastal flood levels were not fully appreciated in the initial
design criteria of the power stations in the 1960s and 1970s.</p>
      <?pagebreak page188?><p id="d1e116">Cases of wintertime coastal flooding like this are caused by storm surges
acting on top of high tides, but there is also an important impact of the
wind-wave field and possibly other dynamic features that are poorly
understood. During a storm surge, water is pushed shoreward under the
surface stress of strong winds, with an additional increase of water level in response to the lower atmospheric pressure that typically characterizes
winter storm events (i.e., the inverted barometer effect). During hurricanes
and cyclones at low latitudes, maximum surge levels can reach 9 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Pugh,
1987), and for Hurricane Katrina in the northern Gulf of Mexico water levels
of 7.5 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were recorded (Muir-Wood and Grossi, 2008). For North Sea storm
surges, the local effect of storm winds and atmospheric pressure is
augmented by a travelling storm surge wave that enters the North Sea north
of Scotland and moves counter-clockwise around the basin as a
coastally-trapped wave with a similar speed as the semi-diurnal tide. This
can result in water levels reaching <inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the average high
tide level in the southern North Sea for the worst winter storm surge events
(Ishiguro, 1981). Waves on different time and spatial scales have an
important role in augmenting coastal erosion and infrastructure damage
during the storm flooding events. Harbour seiches – oscillations in
semi-enclosed basins with time scales of minutes to hours – are a widely
known phenomenon around the world including the North Sea (Pugh, 1987).
Mostly, the amplitudes of harbour seiches tend to be small relative to the
tide and storm surge water levels. However, under certain resonance
conditions, associated with basin geometry and the speed of travelling
weather disturbances, these can be greatly increased in amplitude, up to
5–6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for the highest known cases in the Mediterranean Sea. These special
cases have the height and frequency characteristics of tsunamis and have
been identified as “meteotsunamis” (Monserrat et al., 2006; Pattiaratchi and
Wijeratne, 2015). The phenomenon is also known in the North Sea but has
mostly been a second order effect that is smaller than the tidal amplitude
(but see also Pugh and Woodworth, 2014). De Jong and Battjes (2004)
highlighted the case of seiches in Rotterdam Harbour during storms, an
important issue because of the potential threat to ship navigation and the
storm surge barrier. Kettle (2018) showed that similar harbour seiches
excited during Storm Britta in 2006 were a widespread phenomenon in North
Sea coastal areas with some coherence among regional stations. The anomalous
surge measured at Delfzijl during Storm Britta on 1 November 2006 may belong
to this type of phenomena, but little is known about it other than the fact
that it could not be explained by existing surge models (RWS, 2006a, b,
2007a), and it may be due to physical processes with temporal and spatial
characteristics that are smaller than present storm surge model resolutions
(Stoffelen, 2014).</p>
      <p id="d1e161">Infragravity waves with periods of 25–130 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> remain a poorly understood
phenomenon but may potentially be an important factor for coastal erosion
and offshore infrastructure damage. High amplitude wave groups with long
periods approaching this range have been linked with damage to the FINO1
offshore wind energy research platform in the German Bight (Hessner and
Reichert, 2007; Neumann and Nolopp, 2007; Rosenthal et al., 2011;
Pleskachevsky et al., 2012) and with certain ship accidents (e.g., KNRM,
2007). Terlouw (2013) has invoked infragravity waves to explain
deeply-penetrating erosion damage in narrow coastal sections of Ameland, one
of the West Frisian Islands, during Storm Britta in 2006. Spencer et al. (2015) surveyed similar patterns of coastal damage on the North Norfolk
coast after Storm Xaver in December 2013 and indicated travelling
oceanographic features in coastal tide gauges and offshore wave recorders.
The underlying physical mechanisms that give rise to these types of wave
events are unclear. The presentation of Rosenthal et al. (2008) shows the
model results of a ship-type wake pattern in the context of Storm Britta but with much larger dimensions that might result from a travelling low
pressure centre. In an investigation of the New Year's Day storm of 1995,
Rosenthal et al. (2011) highlights that two notable ship accidents in the
northern and southern parts of the North Sea occurred under the same
convective cloud band, and there is a possibility of a concentration of wave
energy along atmospheric convergence lines in the flow direction of certain
offshore storms. Another hypothesis relates to a resonant amplification of
travelling wave groups from atmospheric gust structures moving at nearly the
same speed during certain winter storms with open cloud cell convective
structures (Rosenthal et al., 2011; Pleskachevsky et al., 2012).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{1}?><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p id="d1e175">Map of tide gauge stations and shipping/platform incidents during Storm Tilo on 8–9 November 2007.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019-f01.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e184">Storm Tilo struck northwest Europe on 8–9 November 2007 and belongs in the
same category of severity as the New Year's Day storm of 1995, Storm Britta
(2006) and Storm Xaver (2013) as an important maritime storm with an unusual
sea state that caused damage in unexpected offshore accidents (Rosenthal et
al., 2011). Similar to other serious North Sea storms, Tilo passed on a
northern track eastward across the northern North Sea, and it had a cold air
outbreak behind the travelling low pressure centre (Lefebvre, 2008). In the
unstable atmospheric conditions over the North Sea, a southward moving array
of open-centre atmospheric convection cells formed, a condition that has
been linked with large wave events during previous storms (Rosenthal et al.,
2011; Pleskachevsky et al., 2012). Storm Tilo affected offshore energy
infrastructure in several ways. Production at several Norwegian North Sea
petroleum platforms was shut down as workers were evacuated in advance of
the event (Upstream, 2007a, b) as part of that country's safety procedures
for extreme maritime storms (Magnusson, 2008). Winds at the Norwegian
platform of Ekofisk reached over 20 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace linebreak="nobreak" width="0.125em"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and a rogue wave was
documented early on 9 November 2007 before the maximum winds (Magnusson and
Donelan, 2013; Donelan and Magnusson, 2017). Within the UK economic zone of
the North Sea, the newly constructed Buzzard Platform was damaged at a high
level of construction on 9 November 2007, resulting in production operations
to be shut down (Upstream, 2007c, d; Lloyd's Casualty Week, 2007). For the
wind energy industry, the storm caused several significant events. The
offshore wind energy research platform FINO1 was damaged by waves at 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
above sea level in an incident similar to Storm Britta on 1 November 2006
(Outzen et al., 2008). There were several onshore wind farm incidents in
Scotland (Caithness Windfarms, 2018). The storm was associated with a
serious coastal storm surge that caused minor flooding in eastern England
(Metoffice, 2011). In the Netherlands, it led to the first-ever closure of
the storm surge barrier protecting the port of Rotterdam, and heightened
dyke monitoring along the entire coast (RWS, 2007b). Along certain sections
of the German coast, there were dune collapses (Heyken, 2007). There were
also a number of ship and platform incidents across the North Sea where the
winds or sea state were reported to have had an important role. The
Supplement gives a list of the sources reviewed for this report,
together with a set of thematic<?pagebreak page190?> tables with more information on the
different met-ocean aspects and societal impacts of the storm.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <label>2</label><title>Methods</title>
      <p id="d1e220">The water level data from 76 tide gauges around the North Sea (Fig. 1) were
analysed to characterize their storm surge component and short period
oscillations. The tide gauge data originate from the national tide gauge
networks of the UK, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, and Norway.
Data quality was assessed visually, and for the UK stations, quality
assessment was facilitated by the annual tide gauge report from the
government authority (Natural Environment Research Council, 2007). The water level data sets had a time
resolution of 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, except for the UK (15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), Germany (1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and the two GESLA stations for France (60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The 1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
data for the German tide gauge stations were averaged onto a 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> grid
to facilitate subsequent processing. Further information about the tide
gauges is given in Table S1 in the Supplement. The spectral components
of the 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series intervals across the storm period (1–14 November,
inclusive) were calculated using a discrete Fourier transform (Stull, 1988).
Spectral graphs were produced to identify the dominant tidal and storm surge
periods (see Fig. 2). The spectral information was used to reconstruct three
component time series with different frequency bands corresponding the storm
surge (with periods greater than 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), tides (with periods between 0.2
and 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and short period oscillations (with periods less than 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>). The tides in the North Sea have a dominant semi-diurnal component and
a smaller diurnal component. The division of 1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> between the tidal band
and the storm surge band was chosen on the basis of a minimum inflection at
this period shown in many spectral graphs (see Fig. 2). The division of 0.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (or 4.8 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) between tidal and short period oscillations was chosen
empirically so that for most water level stations the reconstructed time
series would have a smooth profile with two semi-diurnal peaks per day (see
also Kettle, 2018). Other investigations of meteotsunamis have used similar
filtering techniques to isolate the meteotsunami signal from the tide, and
different frequency cutoff thresholds have been used corresponding to
periods that vary between 2 and 6 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (Monserrat et al., 2006; Pattiaratchi
and Wijeratne, 2015).</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2"><?xmltex \currentcnt{2}?><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p id="d1e339">Spectrum of the water level time series from Lerwick, UK for 1–14 November 2007. The original 15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series was subsampled to give three data sets of 45 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">min</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> resolution from which the spectral mean and standard deviation uncertainty could be calculated, as shown. The noise level was estimated based on the standard deviation of the first difference of the original time series.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=236.157874pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019-f02.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e364">The statistics of the short period time series component were calculated to
characterize periods and amplitudes of the oscillation structures for the
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> storm period (8–9 November). This included a count of the number of
complete zero crossing oscillations present, the maximum (crest height) and
minimum (trough depth) of each oscillation, and the trough-to-crest
oscillation height. This was conducted separately for the down-crossing and
up-crossing oscillations. Following observations of a ringing dissipation
effect in certain tide gauge stations during Storm Britta (Kettle, 2018), an
analysis was conducted to assess how the highest trough-to-peak oscillation
for each tide gauge station during Storm Tilo decayed during successive
oscillations.</p>
      <p id="d1e376">A data base of 16 shipping and offshore platform incidents was compiled from
media, trade, and scientific reports. Lloyd's Casualty Week (2007) was the
most important source of this information, and most of the accident reports
could be corroborated in different sources. The incidents were grouped into
different categories according to the reported nature of the accident: ship
collisions or groundings, containers or deck cargo washed overboard, engine
problems or power blackout, and injuries or man overboard. Most of these
offshore incident reports mention bad weather conditions as a contributing
factor, and one case (“<italic>NYK Antares</italic>”) specifically attributes containers lost overboard
to a single wave event. Information on the incidents is summarized in
Table S2 with a list of sources. Most of the reports
give fairly precise information on the location and time of the accidents,
and it is possible to compare them with the short period oscillation
features observed in the water level data. Although some of the
infrastructure events may have been caused by large infragravity waves whose
time duration would be too short to register on tide gauges (e.g., KNRM,
2007), the impact of these waves on nearby coasts and harbours may have
excited transient harbour seiches with periods on the order of 10s of
minutes, which is within the measurement capability of water level
recorders.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F3" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{3}?><label>Figure 3</label><caption><p id="d1e384"><bold>(a)</bold> Original tide gauge time series for the 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> interval of Storm Tilo 8–9 November 2007 and reconstructions for the <bold>(b)</bold> long period component (periods <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; storm surge), <bold>(c)</bold> intermediate period component (periods in the range 0.2–1.2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; tide), and <bold>(d)</bold> short period component (periods <inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; harbour seiche). The plot shows a subset of time series data from 38 stations, and the full data set of 76 stations used in this project is shown in the Supplement.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=398.338583pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019-f03.png"/>

      </fig>

</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <label>3</label><title>Results</title>
      <p id="d1e465">The main results of the spectral analysis and time series reconstructions
are shown in the four panels of Fig. 3. The first<?pagebreak page191?> panel (Fig. 3a) shows the
original water level time series data for the storm period 8–9 November 2007. The time series are plotted with a vertical offset and arranged
counter-clockwise around the North Sea starting with Lerwick north of
Scotland and ending with Maløy in western Norway. The main feature of
this series is the semi-diurnal tide, and locations in the southern North
Sea show higher tidal ranges than other locations in northern Denmark and
western Norway. Some of the stations show short period features that appears
as a noisy fluctuation on the dominant tidal features. The maximum water
levels for these series are shown by red crosses, and these highlight the
progression of the tide and storm surge peaks around the North Sea.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F4" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{4}?><label>Figure 4</label><caption><p id="d1e470">Calculated skew surge for Storm Tilo on 8–9 November 2007 with literature reports. The skew surge for Storm Britta on 31 October–1 November 2006 from Kettle (2018) has been shown for comparison.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019-f04.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e479">The time series reconstructions from the spectral analysis clarify the
different time scale components of the original time series, and these are
shown in the panels of Fig. 3b–d. Figure 3b shows the storm surge peak as
it travels around the North Sea from Scotland, and its amplitude was highest
in the southern North Sea. Figure 3c shows the travelling peaks in the tidal
frequency band, highlighting the<?pagebreak page192?> semi-diurnal component. Figure 3d shows the
short period components from the tide gauges. For the short period
component, there are six cases with the trough-to-peak oscillation heights
exceeding 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, and the highest oscillation height at Nieuwe Statenzijl
exceeded 90 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>. Even though all the tide gauges have been processed with the
same spectral analysis routines, there is a qualitative difference in the
short period reconstructions with some clusters of stations exhibiting
features of high frequency noise and others showing longer period wave-like
features. Among some of the stations showing longer period oscillations,
there are instances of temporal offsets that may be due to shallow water
wave propagation or be linked with the field of atmospheric convection cells
moving over the North Sea.</p>
      <p id="d1e499">The height of the measured water level above the expected high tide
prediction (i.e., skew surge; Williams et al., 2016) is an important
parameter to assess the impact of storm surge coastal flooding. For this
study, the height of the maximum measured water level (Fig. 3a) minus the
median of the high tide peaks for period of the analysis of 1–14 November 2007 is shown for different locations around the North Sea in Fig. 4. For
comparison, literature reports (Table S3) of the skew
surge are also plotted, along with the skew surge analysis for the Storm
Britta in 2006 from Kettle (2018; see Table S4).
Figure 4 highlights how the skew surge reached above 2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> above the average
high tide level for many stations in the northern Netherlands and the German
Bight. For most stations along the coast of the UK and the southern
Netherlands, Storm Tilo had a slightly higher skew surge than Storm Britta.
For stations in the northern Netherlands and the German North Sea coast, the
skew surge of Storm Britta was generally higher. The anomalous water level
event recorded at Delfzijl during Storm Britta was noted in several national
authority investigations (RWS, 2006a, b, 2007a), and Fig. 4
shows that it was higher than what was measured during Storm Tilo.</p>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F5" specific-use="star"><?xmltex \currentcnt{5}?><label>Figure 5</label><caption><p id="d1e512">Relation between time and coastline distance around the North Sea during Storm Tilo on 8–9 November 2007 for the semi-diurnal tides, storm surge peak, highest two trough-to-peak heights of the down-crossing short period oscillations, and shipping/platform incidents.</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=483.69685pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/49/187/2019/adgeo-49-187-2019-f05.png"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e521">The relationship among the water level features at different time scales
during Storm Tilo is shown in Fig. 5 along with<?pagebreak page193?> the ship and offshore
platform events. The diagram shows the data plotted on axes of time (hours
after the start of 8 November 2007) versus counter-clockwise coastal
distance around the North Sea starting from Lerwick in the UK. Because the
tides and storm surge travel along the coast, Fig. 5 is a simplifying
diagnostic that permits the representation of the multi-dimensional dynamics
of the system (i.e., latitude, longitude, and time) on a two-dimensional
graph. Four data sets are plotted for the 48 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> period: the progression of
the tidal maxima, the main storm surge maximum associated with Storm Tilo,
the first and second highest trough-to-crest ranges of the short period
oscillations, and the 16 shipping/platform incidents. (Figs. S1 and S2 in
the Supplement show the four data sets separated into two graphs
to facilitate inspection). The progression of the semi-diurnal tide peaks
are shown as diagonal blue lines on the plot, which have been constructed by
linking together semi-diurnal tidal crests between successive stations
within a certain time window. The progression of the surge peak for Storm
Tilo is shown by the heavy red line in the plot, and these have been
constructed in the same manner as the semidiurnal tidal lines. The spectral
analysis of the full 14 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> time series yielded several other propagating
storm surge crests of lower amplitude, and two of these appear as thin red
lines and diamonds at the corners of Fig. 5. The data set of offshore ship
and platform events is plotted as green diamonds with vertical bars and
horizontal tie-lines for reports with temporal or spatial ambiguity.</p>
      <p id="d1e540">There is a fairly close association of the propagating storm surge crest and
the semidiurnal tidal in Fig. 5. The semidiurnal tide propagates with an
average speed of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">14</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–17 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi><mml:mspace width="0.125em" linebreak="nobreak"/><mml:msup><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">s</mml:mi><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, corresponding to a water
depth of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">20</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–30 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">m</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> for a shallow water wave. The moving storm
surge crest is associated mainly with one semi-diurnal tidal crest, but the
surge maximum occurs after the tide along the coasts of the UK and the
southern Netherlands, while for the German Bight the high tide and storm
surge crest occur at nearly the same time. The first and second highest
trough-to-peak oscillations occur mainly before the tidal high water times
during the storm surge period. In many cases, the offshore incidents were
associated with the first or second highest short period oscillations.
Because the short period oscillations have amplitudes of tens of centimetres
and periods on the order of tens of<?pagebreak page194?> minutes to hours, they do not directly
record the wave field that was identified as a contributing factor in
several offshore incidents. On the other hand, they indicate where an
analysis of wave data recordings might be targeted for insight into the
offshore incidents. Different related oscillation height diagnostics can be
used to characterize the extreme short period oscillations in this type of
diagram. These are shown in Figs. S3 and
S4. Figure S3 is similar to Fig. 5 but uses up-crossing oscillation to show
the highest crest-to-trough height ranges, and there are some differences
related to the fact that the oscillations sometimes have a pronounced
asymmetrical shape. Figure S4 selects the two extreme oscillations based on
the crest heights instead of the trough-to-crest full height range. There
are some differences in the pattern of the most extreme oscillations among
these diagrams compared with Fig. 5, but the overall trends are similar.
Figure S5 focuses on the pairwise comparison
of the offshore events and the highest trough-to-peak height ranges of the
short period oscillations of the closest tide gauge station, and it suggests
that there may be a close association between these data sets.</p>
      <p id="d1e588">The technical literature recognizes that the extreme water level
fluctuations associated with tsunamis and harbour seiches last for periods
of hours to days, oscillating at particular frequencies before decaying out
through frictional energy losses (Pugh, 1987; Murty, 1977; Pattiaratchi and
Wijeratne, 2015). Many published time series recordings of the phenomena
show approximately exponentially decreasing trends. Murty (1977, p. 243)
quantifies the trend in terms of a “decay constant”, which would correspond
to the inverse of the e-folding time in his mathematical treatment, and Dean
and Dalrymple (1991) give more information on the mathematical description
of exponentially decaying long waves. For the North Sea tide gauge data for
Storm Tilo, many cases were found where the highest oscillation was directly
followed by the second highest oscillation (Fig. 5). This indicates that
there may be a ringing effect initiated by an excitation mechanism possibly
associated with the travelling atmospheric convection cells (De Jong and
Battjes, 2004). An analysis of this effect was conducted using the summary
statistics of the down-crossing oscillations for 8–9 November 2007. For the
2 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> of data for each station, the oscillation with the highest
trough-to-peak range was identified, and the information for all the
successively decreasing oscillations was extracted. The extracted data
series had at least two and up to eight oscillations (for the case of
Delfzijl). The data were fitted with an exponential decay model to yield a median value for the e-folding decay times of 3.3 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> (range of 0.4–45.1 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">h</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>),
which agrees with results from Storm Britta in Kettle (2018). Additional
information on the time span and e-folding decay times of the short period
oscillations at individual stations is shown in Figs. S6, S7 and Table S5.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <label>4</label><title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e623">Storm Tilo ranks among the more serious storms of the past 30 years
(Larsén et al., 2017) for its threat to energy infrastructure,
especially offshore. Offshore platforms for petroleum production and wind
energy research were damaged during this storm by the wind and wave field.
The analysis of dynamical features in the tide gauge records for a series of
stations around the North Sea reveals the progression of the surge, tides,
and short period oscillations. The amplitude of the skew surge at different
sections around the coast is highlighted, and the highest skew surge was
along the coasts of the Netherlands and Germany. The reconstructed short
period (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.2</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) elements of the water level record revealed an
oscillation or ringing phenomena that exceeded 60 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="unit"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">cm</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> in trough-to-crest
height for several stations. These oscillations have previously been
identified with the harbour seiche phenomenon (Pugh, 1987), but they also
fall within the range of defining characteristics of meteotsunamis
(Monserrat et al., 2006; Pattiaratchi and Wijeratne, 2015; Maxial et al.,
2019). For Storm Tilo, the trough-to-peak height of these features was
smaller than range of the tides and storm surge at most North Sea stations,
so that they were of second order importance for coastal flooding risk. On
the other hand, storm flood levels during Storm Britta exceeded the
numerical model predictions that encapsulate the understanding of storm
surge dynamics (RWS, 2006a, b, 2007a), and certain reports indicate
there may have been a high risk of coastal dyke breaches and flooding (Ulm
et al., 2018). As well, the highest of the short period oscillations during
Storm Tilo appeared to show correspondence in time and location with some of
the reported infrastructure events. Together with instances of coastal dune
collapse and accounts of wave-damage of offshore infrastructure, this may
indicate an important role for wave-like features on intermediate time and
space scales between wind waves and the semidiurnal tide.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability"><title>Data availability</title>

      <p id="d1e657">The water level data for this study was measured by the national tide gauge networks of the UK, France, the Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, and Norway.  The data were downloaded from publicly accessible websites maintained by the national authorities, except for France (dataset obtained through the GESLA online archive) and Germany (datasets sent by Wilfried Wiechmann of the Federal Institute of Hydrology in Germany).  Further information on the URL internet addresses is given in Table S1 of the Supplement.</p>
  </notes><app-group>
        <supplementary-material position="anchor"><?pagebreak page195?><p id="d1e660">The supplement related to this article is available online at: <inline-supplementary-material xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-187-2019-supplement" xlink:title="pdf">https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-49-187-2019-supplement</inline-supplementary-material>.<?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?></p></supplementary-material>
        </app-group><notes notes-type="authorcontribution"><title>Author contributions</title>

      <p id="d1e670">AJK conducted the data analysis, wrote the manuscript, and made a poster presentation at the EGU General Assembly 2019, Vienna, Austria.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests"><title>Competing interests</title>

      <p id="d1e676">The author declares that they have no conflict of interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement"><title>Special issue statement</title>

      <p id="d1e682">This article is part of the special issue “European Geosciences Union General Assembly 2019, EGU Division Energy, Resources &amp; Environment (ERE)”. It is a result of the EGU General Assembly 2019, Vienna, Austria, 7–12 April 2019.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e688">The author gratefully acknowledges data from national tide gauge networks of
the UK, Netherlands, Germany, Denmark, and Norway, and the GESLA archive for
France. The tide gauge data for the UK, France, the Netherlands, and Norway was
downloaded from Internet servers. For Germany, Wilfried Wiechmann of the
Federal Institute of Hydrology of Germany kindly provided tide gauge data by
email. For Denmark, part of the tide gauge data was downloaded from public
websites, and Bjørn Steen Frederiksen of Kystdirektoratet indicated a
website where other tide gauge data could be accessed. Antke Reemts of the
German Search and Rescue Service and Edwin Granneman of the Netherlands
Coastguard provided information on some of the offshore incidents during
Storm Tilo. The author appreciated conversations on offshore storm issues
with other EGU2019 attendees: Dirk Becker, Elizabeth Bradshaw, Lidia Gaslikova, Gregor Giebel (ERE Energy Meteorology convener), Daniela Maxial,
Vinca Rosmorduc, Pal Schmitt, Len Shaffrey, Ina Teusch, and Marius Ulm. The
comments of two anonymous referees improved the manuscript.</p></ack><notes notes-type="reviewstatement"><title>Review statement</title>

      <p id="d1e693">This paper was edited by Gregor Giebel and reviewed by two anonymous referees.</p>
  </notes><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Berz, G.: Windstorm and storm surges in Europe: loss trends and possible
counter-actions from the viewpoint of an international reinsurer, Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. A, 363, 1431–1440, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1577" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2005.1577</ext-link>, 2005.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Caithness Windfarms: WIND TURBINE ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT COMPILATION, available at: <uri>http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/fullaccidents.pdf</uri>, last access: 30 September 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Cruz, A. M. and Krausmann, E.: Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to
climate change and extreme weather events, Clim. Change, 121, 41–53,
2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Dean, R. G. and Dalrymple, R. A.: Water wave mechanics for engineers and
scientists, World Scientific, New Jersey, 1991.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
De Fraguier, E.: Lessons learned from 1999 Blayais flood: Overview of EDF
flood risk management plan, RIC 2010 External Flood and Extreme
Precipitation Hazard Analysis for Nuclear Plant Safety Session, presentation
to U.S. NRC, Regulatory Information Conference (RIC) at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, 11 March 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>De Jong, M. P. C. and Battjes, J. A.: Low-frequency sea waves generated by
atmospheric convection cells, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C01011, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001931" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1029/2003JC001931</ext-link>, 2004.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Donelan, M. A. and Magnusson, A.-K.: The making of the Andrea Wave and other
rogues, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 44124, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44124" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1038/srep44124</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Flather, R. A., Draper, L., and Proctor, R.: Coastal flooding in the Bristol
Channel and Severn Estuary on 13th December 1981, IOS Internal Document No.
162, May, 1982.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Hessner, K. and Reichert, K.: Sea surface elevation maps obtained with a
nautical X-band radar – Examples from WaMoS II stations, 10th
International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting and Coastal
Hazard Symposium, North Shore, Oahu, Hawaii, 11–16 November 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Heyken, H.: Schwere Sturmflut an niedersächsischer Nordseeküste –
Dünenabbrüche auf den Inseln, NLWKN press release, available at: <uri>https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles/presse_und_offentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilungen/-43218.html</uri> (last access: 15 October 2019), 9 November 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ishiguro, S.: Storm surge predictions by the quasi uniform stead
wind/pressure field method, Institute of Ocean Sciences, Internal Document
102, Wormley, Surrey, England, 1981.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Kettle, A. J.: The North Sea surge of 31 October–1 November 2006 during Storm Britta, Adv. Geosci., 45, 273–279, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-273-2018" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/adgeo-45-273-2018</ext-link>, 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Kirby, R.: Hinkley Point sediment transport – potential impacts of new
structures, British Energy Estuarine &amp; Marine Studies Technical Report
Series, BEEMS TR 149, September 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
KNRM: Capsize and Survival, Report on lifeboat Anna Margaretha's capsizes
November 1st 2006, Koninklijke Nederlandse Redding, Maatschappij,  16 May 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Larsén, X. G., Du, J., Bolaños, R., and Larsen, S.: On the impact of
wind on the development of the wave fields during storm Britta, Ocean Dynam.,
67, 1407–1427, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1100-1" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-017-1100-1</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Lefebvre, C.: Orkan TILO am 8. und 9. November 2007, DWD report, available at: <uri>https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/besondereereignisse/stuerme/20071108_orkan_tilo.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=4</uri> (last access: 15 October 2019), 1 January 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Lloyd's Casualty Week: Lloyd's Casualty Week, Lloyd's of London Press,  Colchester, Essex, UK, 23 November 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Magnusson, A. K.: Forecasting extreme waves in practice, Proceedings of Rogue
Waves 2008, Brest, France, 13–15 October 2008, 23 pp., 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Magnusson, A. K. and Donelan, M. A.: The Andrea wave. Characteristics of a
measured North Sea rogue wave, J. Offshore Mech. Arct., 135, 1–10, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023800" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1115/1.4023800</ext-link>, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Maxial, D., Omira, R., Baptista, M. A., Rabinovich, A., and Viterbo, P.:
Meteotsunamis in the instrumental records of the Iberian coast: Oceanic and
atmospheric data analysis towards building a meteotsunami catalogue, EGU
General Assembly, 21, EGU2019-9953, Vienna, Austria, April 2019.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Metoffice: Storm surge – November 2007, <uri>https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who/how/case-studies/floods-2007</uri> (last access: 21 September 2018),
last update: 11 May 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <?pagebreak page196?><ref id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Monserrat, S., Vilibić, I., and Rabinovich, A. B.: Meteotsunamis: atmospherically induced destructive ocean waves in the tsunami frequency band, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 1035–1051, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-1035-2006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.5194/nhess-6-1035-2006</ext-link>, 2006.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Muir-Wood, R. and Grossi, P.: The catastrophe modelling response to
Hurricane Katrina, in: Climate Extremes and Society, edited by: Diaz, H. F. and Murnane,
R. J., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 296–319, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Murty, T. S.: Seismic Sea Waves Tsunamis, Bulletin of the Fisheries Research
Board of Canada, Bulletin 198, Ottawa, 1977.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Natural Environment Research Council: Annual Report for 2007 for the UK National Tide Gauge Network
and Related Sea Level Science, National Tide and Sea Level Facility, NERC
100017897, available at: <uri>https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/hosted_data_systems/sea_level/uk_tide_gauge_network/reports/</uri> (last access: 15 October 2019), 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Neumann, T. and Nolopp, K.: Three years operation of far offshore
measurements at FINO1, DEWI Magasin, 30, 42–46, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Outzen, O., Herklotz, K., Heinrich, H., and Lefebvre, C.: Extreme waves at
FINO1 research platform caused by storm `Tilo' on 9 November 2007, DEWI
Magazin, 33, 17–23, 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Paskal, C.: The security implications of climate change in the OSCE region,
Organization for security and co-operation in Europe, Chairmanship
Conference, Bucharest, 5 October 2009, PC.NGO/10/09, 12 October 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pattiaratchi, C. B. and Wijeratne, E. M. S.: Are meteotsunamis an underrated
hazard?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 373, 2140377,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0377" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1098/rsta.2014.0377</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Pleskachevsky, A. L., Lehner, S., and Rosenthal, W.: Storm observations by
remote sensing and influences of gustiness on ocean waves and on generation
of rogue waves, Ocean Dynam., 62, 1335–1351, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-012-0567-z" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1007/s10236-012-0567-z</ext-link>, 2012.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pugh, D. T.: Tides, Surges and Mean Sea Level, John Wiley and Sons,
Chichester, 1987.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Pugh, D. and Woodworth, P.: Sea-Level Science. Understanding Tides, Surges,
Tsunamis and Mean Sea-Level Changes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Rosenthal, W., Lehner, S., Schulz-Stellenflet, J., and König, T.:
Investigation of ship accidents using global ERS-2 and ENVISAT wave mode,
The 2nd International Workshop on Advances in SAR Oceanography from
ENVISAT and ERS Missions, 21–25 January 2008, available at:
<uri>http://www.earth.esa.int/seasar2008/participants/232/pres_232_rosenthal.pdf</uri> (last access: 8 October 2019), 2008.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Rosenthal, W., Pleskachevsky, A. L., Lehner, S., and Brusch, S.: Observation
and modeling of high individual ocean waves and wave groups caused by a
variable wind field, 12th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and
Forecasting, Kohala Coast, Hawai'i, HI, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>RWS: Verslag van de stormvloed van 31 oktober en 1 november 2006 (SR84),
Allerheiligenvloed, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat,
Stormvloedwaarschuwingsdienst/SVSD, `s-Gravenhage, November 2006a.
 </mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
RWS: Evaluatie Allerheiligenvloed 2006. Analyse van de voorspelling van de
hoogwaterstand voor Delfzijl, 38 pp., Den Haag, the Netherlands, 24 November 2006b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
RWS: Allerheiligenvloed 2006. Achtergrondverslag van de stormvloed van 1
november 2006, Rijkswaterstaat Rijksinstituut voor Kust en Zee/RIKZ, Artoos Drukkerijen, Rijswijk, the Netherlands, 30 June 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
RWS: Verslag van de Stormvloed van 9 november 2007 (SR88), Ministerie van
Verkeer en Waterstaat, Direktoraat-Generaal Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst,
Stormvloedwaarschuwingsdienst/SVSD, Postbus 17, 8200 AA Lelystad, Lelystad, 45 pp., November 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Salomon, J.-N.: L'inondation dans la basse vallée de la Garonne et
l'estuaire de la Gironde lors de la “tempête du siècle” (27–28 décembre 1999)/Flooding in the Garonne valley and the Gironde estuary
caused by the “storm of the century” (27–28 December 1999), in:
Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, Avril–juin, 8, 127–134, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3406/morfo.2002.1134" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3406/morfo.2002.1134</ext-link>, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Spencer, T., Brooks, S. M., Evans, B. R., Tempest, J. A., and Möller, I.:
Southern North Sea storm surge event of 5 December 2013: Water levels, waves
and coastal impacts, Earth-Sci. Rev., 146, 120–145, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.04.002" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.04.002</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stoffelen, A.: Modelling Surges, Cork eSurge Training, Cork, Ireland, 20–21 February 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Terlouw, A.: Predicting morphological storm impact on coastal dunes at
Ameland, MSc thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, 2013.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Ulm, M., Arns, A., and Jensen, J.: Black swans and risk – assessing
consequences of extreme events for the German Bight, 36th International
Conference on Coastal Engineering 2018 – Coastal Protection and Risk, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 30 July–3 August 2018.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Storms force Ekofisk closures, contributor: Michael O'Neill, 9 November 2007a.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Passing storm keeps platforms shut, contributor: Rob Watts, 9 November 2007b.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Storm downs Nexen's Buzzard, contributor: Jonathan Davis, 9 November 2007c.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Storm clips Buzzard's wings, contributor: Anthea Pitt, 12 November 2007d.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><?label 1?><mixed-citation>Williams, J., Horsburgh, K. J., Williams, J. A., and Proctor, R. N. F.: Tide and
skew surge independence: New insights for flood risk, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 6410–6417, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069522" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1002/2016GL069522</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Storm Tilo over Europe in November 2007: storm surge and impacts on societal and energy infrastructure</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>Storm Tilo on 8–9 November 2007 ranks among the serious
winter storms in northern Europe over the past 30 years. Its low pressure
centre passed across the northern North Sea, and this led to a cold air
outbreak in northwest Europe. Strong north winds across the North Sea
contributed to a high storm surge that was serious for coastal regions in
eastern England, the Netherlands and Germany. Storm winds and unusually high
waves caused shipping accidents and damage to some offshore energy
infrastructure. This report presents an outline of the met-ocean conditions
and a short overview of storm impacts on societal and energy infrastructure.
The progress of the storm surge around the North Sea is analysed using data
from the national tide gauge networks. A spectral analysis of the water
level data is used to isolate the long period storm surge and short period
oscillations (i.e.,  &lt; 4.8&thinsp;h) from the tidal signal. The calculated
skew surge is compared with literature reports for this storm and also with
another serious North Sea storm from 31 October–1 November 2006 (Storm
Britta). The short period oscillations are compared with the platform and
shipping incident reports for the 2&thinsp;d storm period. The results support
previous reports of unusual wave and water level dynamics during some severe
regional winter storms.</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Berz, G.: Windstorm and storm surges in Europe: loss trends and possible
counter-actions from the viewpoint of an international reinsurer, Phil.
Trans. R. Soc. A, 363, 1431–1440, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1577" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2005.1577</a>, 2005.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>
Caithness Windfarms: WIND TURBINE ACCIDENT AND INCIDENT COMPILATION, available at: <a href="http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/fullaccidents.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.caithnesswindfarms.co.uk/fullaccidents.pdf</a>, last access: 30 September 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>
Cruz, A. M. and Krausmann, E.: Vulnerability of the oil and gas sector to
climate change and extreme weather events, Clim. Change, 121, 41–53,
2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>
Dean, R. G. and Dalrymple, R. A.: Water wave mechanics for engineers and
scientists, World Scientific, New Jersey, 1991.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>
De Fraguier, E.: Lessons learned from 1999 Blayais flood: Overview of EDF
flood risk management plan, RIC 2010 External Flood and Extreme
Precipitation Hazard Analysis for Nuclear Plant Safety Session, presentation
to U.S. NRC, Regulatory Information Conference (RIC) at the Bethesda North Marriott Hotel and Conference Center, 11 March 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>
De Jong, M. P. C. and Battjes, J. A.: Low-frequency sea waves generated by
atmospheric convection cells, J. Geophys. Res., 109, C01011, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001931" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1029/2003JC001931</a>, 2004.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>
Donelan, M. A. and Magnusson, A.-K.: The making of the Andrea Wave and other
rogues, Sci. Rep.-UK, 7, 44124, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44124" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44124</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>
Flather, R. A., Draper, L., and Proctor, R.: Coastal flooding in the Bristol
Channel and Severn Estuary on 13th December 1981, IOS Internal Document No.
162, May, 1982.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>
Hessner, K. and Reichert, K.: Sea surface elevation maps obtained with a
nautical X-band radar – Examples from WaMoS II stations, 10th
International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and Forecasting and Coastal
Hazard Symposium, North Shore, Oahu, Hawaii, 11–16 November 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>
Heyken, H.: Schwere Sturmflut an niedersächsischer Nordseeküste –
Dünenabbrüche auf den Inseln, NLWKN press release, available at: <a href="https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles/presse_und_offentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilungen/-43218.html" target="_blank">https://www.nlwkn.niedersachsen.de/startseite/aktuelles/presse_und_offentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilungen/-43218.html</a> (last access: 15 October 2019), 9 November 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>
Ishiguro, S.: Storm surge predictions by the quasi uniform stead
wind/pressure field method, Institute of Ocean Sciences, Internal Document
102, Wormley, Surrey, England, 1981.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>
Kettle, A. J.: The North Sea surge of 31 October–1 November 2006 during Storm Britta, Adv. Geosci., 45, 273–279, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-273-2018" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-45-273-2018</a>, 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>
Kirby, R.: Hinkley Point sediment transport – potential impacts of new
structures, British Energy Estuarine &amp; Marine Studies Technical Report
Series, BEEMS TR 149, September 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>
KNRM: Capsize and Survival, Report on lifeboat Anna Margaretha's capsizes
November 1st 2006, Koninklijke Nederlandse Redding, Maatschappij,  16 May 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib15"><label>15</label><mixed-citation>
Larsén, X. G., Du, J., Bolaños, R., and Larsen, S.: On the impact of
wind on the development of the wave fields during storm Britta, Ocean Dynam.,
67, 1407–1427, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1100-1" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-017-1100-1</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib16"><label>16</label><mixed-citation>
Lefebvre, C.: Orkan TILO am 8. und 9. November 2007, DWD report, available at: <a href="https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/besondereereignisse/stuerme/20071108_orkan_tilo.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=4" target="_blank">https://www.dwd.de/DE/leistungen/besondereereignisse/stuerme/20071108_orkan_tilo.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&amp;v=4</a> (last access: 15 October 2019), 1 January 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib17"><label>17</label><mixed-citation>
Lloyd's Casualty Week: Lloyd's Casualty Week, Lloyd's of London Press,  Colchester, Essex, UK, 23 November 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib18"><label>18</label><mixed-citation>
Magnusson, A. K.: Forecasting extreme waves in practice, Proceedings of Rogue
Waves 2008, Brest, France, 13–15 October 2008, 23 pp., 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib19"><label>19</label><mixed-citation>
Magnusson, A. K. and Donelan, M. A.: The Andrea wave. Characteristics of a
measured North Sea rogue wave, J. Offshore Mech. Arct., 135, 1–10, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023800" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4023800</a>, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib20"><label>20</label><mixed-citation>
Maxial, D., Omira, R., Baptista, M. A., Rabinovich, A., and Viterbo, P.:
Meteotsunamis in the instrumental records of the Iberian coast: Oceanic and
atmospheric data analysis towards building a meteotsunami catalogue, EGU
General Assembly, 21, EGU2019-9953, Vienna, Austria, April 2019.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib21"><label>21</label><mixed-citation>
Metoffice: Storm surge – November 2007, <a href="https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who/how/case-studies/floods-2007" target="_blank">https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-us/who/how/case-studies/floods-2007</a> (last access: 21 September 2018),
last update: 11 May 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib22"><label>22</label><mixed-citation>
Monserrat, S., Vilibić, I., and Rabinovich, A. B.: Meteotsunamis: atmospherically induced destructive ocean waves in the tsunami frequency band, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 6, 1035–1051, <a href="https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-1035-2006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-6-1035-2006</a>, 2006.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib23"><label>23</label><mixed-citation>
Muir-Wood, R. and Grossi, P.: The catastrophe modelling response to
Hurricane Katrina, in: Climate Extremes and Society, edited by: Diaz, H. F. and Murnane,
R. J., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 296–319, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib24"><label>24</label><mixed-citation>
Murty, T. S.: Seismic Sea Waves Tsunamis, Bulletin of the Fisheries Research
Board of Canada, Bulletin 198, Ottawa, 1977.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib25"><label>25</label><mixed-citation>
Natural Environment Research Council: Annual Report for 2007 for the UK National Tide Gauge Network
and Related Sea Level Science, National Tide and Sea Level Facility, NERC
100017897, available at: <a href="https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/hosted_data_systems/sea_level/uk_tide_gauge_network/reports/" target="_blank">https://www.bodc.ac.uk/data/hosted_data_systems/sea_level/uk_tide_gauge_network/reports/</a> (last access: 15 October 2019), 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib26"><label>26</label><mixed-citation>
Neumann, T. and Nolopp, K.: Three years operation of far offshore
measurements at FINO1, DEWI Magasin, 30, 42–46, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib27"><label>27</label><mixed-citation>
Outzen, O., Herklotz, K., Heinrich, H., and Lefebvre, C.: Extreme waves at
FINO1 research platform caused by storm `Tilo' on 9 November 2007, DEWI
Magazin, 33, 17–23, 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib28"><label>28</label><mixed-citation>
Paskal, C.: The security implications of climate change in the OSCE region,
Organization for security and co-operation in Europe, Chairmanship
Conference, Bucharest, 5 October 2009, PC.NGO/10/09, 12 October 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib29"><label>29</label><mixed-citation>
Pattiaratchi, C. B. and Wijeratne, E. M. S.: Are meteotsunamis an underrated
hazard?, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 373, 2140377,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0377" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0377</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib30"><label>30</label><mixed-citation>
Pleskachevsky, A. L., Lehner, S., and Rosenthal, W.: Storm observations by
remote sensing and influences of gustiness on ocean waves and on generation
of rogue waves, Ocean Dynam., 62, 1335–1351, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-012-0567-z" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-012-0567-z</a>, 2012.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib31"><label>31</label><mixed-citation>
Pugh, D. T.: Tides, Surges and Mean Sea Level, John Wiley and Sons,
Chichester, 1987.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib32"><label>32</label><mixed-citation>
Pugh, D. and Woodworth, P.: Sea-Level Science. Understanding Tides, Surges,
Tsunamis and Mean Sea-Level Changes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge,
2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib33"><label>33</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenthal, W., Lehner, S., Schulz-Stellenflet, J., and König, T.:
Investigation of ship accidents using global ERS-2 and ENVISAT wave mode,
The 2nd International Workshop on Advances in SAR Oceanography from
ENVISAT and ERS Missions, 21–25 January 2008, available at:
<a href="http://www.earth.esa.int/seasar2008/participants/232/pres_232_rosenthal.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.earth.esa.int/seasar2008/participants/232/pres_232_rosenthal.pdf</a> (last access: 8 October 2019), 2008.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib34"><label>34</label><mixed-citation>
Rosenthal, W., Pleskachevsky, A. L., Lehner, S., and Brusch, S.: Observation
and modeling of high individual ocean waves and wave groups caused by a
variable wind field, 12th International Workshop on Wave Hindcasting and
Forecasting, Kohala Coast, Hawai'i, HI, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib35"><label>35</label><mixed-citation>
RWS: Verslag van de stormvloed van 31 oktober en 1 november 2006 (SR84),
Allerheiligenvloed, Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Rijkswaterstaat,
Stormvloedwaarschuwingsdienst/SVSD, `s-Gravenhage, November 2006a.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib36"><label>36</label><mixed-citation>
RWS: Evaluatie Allerheiligenvloed 2006. Analyse van de voorspelling van de
hoogwaterstand voor Delfzijl, 38 pp., Den Haag, the Netherlands, 24 November 2006b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib37"><label>37</label><mixed-citation>
RWS: Allerheiligenvloed 2006. Achtergrondverslag van de stormvloed van 1
november 2006, Rijkswaterstaat Rijksinstituut voor Kust en Zee/RIKZ, Artoos Drukkerijen, Rijswijk, the Netherlands, 30 June 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib38"><label>38</label><mixed-citation>
RWS: Verslag van de Stormvloed van 9 november 2007 (SR88), Ministerie van
Verkeer en Waterstaat, Direktoraat-Generaal Rijkswaterstaat Waterdienst,
Stormvloedwaarschuwingsdienst/SVSD, Postbus 17, 8200 AA Lelystad, Lelystad, 45 pp., November 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib39"><label>39</label><mixed-citation>
Salomon, J.-N.: L'inondation dans la basse vallée de la Garonne et
l'estuaire de la Gironde lors de la “tempête du siècle” (27–28 décembre 1999)/Flooding in the Garonne valley and the Gironde estuary
caused by the “storm of the century” (27–28 December 1999), in:
Géomorphologie: relief, processus, environnement, Avril–juin, 8, 127–134, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3406/morfo.2002.1134" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3406/morfo.2002.1134</a>, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib40"><label>40</label><mixed-citation>
Spencer, T., Brooks, S. M., Evans, B. R., Tempest, J. A., and Möller, I.:
Southern North Sea storm surge event of 5 December 2013: Water levels, waves
and coastal impacts, Earth-Sci. Rev., 146, 120–145, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.04.002" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.04.002</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib41"><label>41</label><mixed-citation>
Stoffelen, A.: Modelling Surges, Cork eSurge Training, Cork, Ireland, 20–21 February 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib42"><label>42</label><mixed-citation>
Stull, R. B.: An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology, Kluwer Academic
Publishers, Dordrecht, 1988.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib43"><label>43</label><mixed-citation>
Terlouw, A.: Predicting morphological storm impact on coastal dunes at
Ameland, MSc thesis, University of Twente, Enschede, 2013.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib44"><label>44</label><mixed-citation>
Ulm, M., Arns, A., and Jensen, J.: Black swans and risk – assessing
consequences of extreme events for the German Bight, 36th International
Conference on Coastal Engineering 2018 – Coastal Protection and Risk, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, 30 July–3 August 2018.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib45"><label>45</label><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Storms force Ekofisk closures, contributor: Michael O'Neill, 9 November 2007a.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib46"><label>46</label><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Passing storm keeps platforms shut, contributor: Rob Watts, 9 November 2007b.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib47"><label>47</label><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Storm downs Nexen's Buzzard, contributor: Jonathan Davis, 9 November 2007c.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib48"><label>48</label><mixed-citation>
Upstream: Storm clips Buzzard's wings, contributor: Anthea Pitt, 12 November 2007d.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib49"><label>49</label><mixed-citation>
Williams, J., Horsburgh, K. J., Williams, J. A., and Proctor, R. N. F.: Tide and
skew surge independence: New insights for flood risk, Geophys. Res. Lett.,
43, 6410–6417, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069522" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069522</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
