<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD Journal Publishing with OASIS Tables v3.0 20080202//EN" "journalpub-oasis3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:oasis="http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/oasis-exchange/table" xml:lang="en" dtd-version="3.0"><?xmltex \makeatother\@nolinetrue\makeatletter?>
  <front>
    <journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher">ADGEO</journal-id><journal-title-group>
    <journal-title>Advances in Geosciences</journal-title>
    <abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">ADGEO</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="nlm-ta">Adv. Geosci.</abbrev-journal-title>
  </journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">1680-7359</issn><publisher>
    <publisher-name>Copernicus Publications</publisher-name>
    <publisher-loc>Göttingen, Germany</publisher-loc>
  </publisher></journal-meta>
    <article-meta>
      <article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.5194/adgeo-45-259-2018</article-id><title-group><article-title>Distribution of minor metallic elements within waste incineration bottom
ashes defined by WDX/EDX spectrometry</article-title><alt-title>Distribution of minor metallic elements</alt-title>
      </title-group><?xmltex \runningtitle{Distribution of minor metallic elements}?><?xmltex \runningauthor{P.~R.~Kowalski et al.}?>
      <contrib-group>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kowalski</surname><given-names>Piotr R.</given-names></name>
          <email>p.kowalski@doctoral.uj.edu.pl</email>
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Kasina</surname><given-names>Monika</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="no" rid="aff1">
          <name><surname>Michalik</surname><given-names>Marek</given-names></name>
          
        </contrib>
        <aff id="aff1"><institution>Institute of Geological Sciences, Jagiellonian University,
Gronostajowa 3a, 30-387 Kraków, Poland</institution>
        </aff>
      </contrib-group>
      <author-notes><corresp id="corr1">Piotr R. Kowalski (p.kowalski@doctoral.uj.edu.pl)</corresp></author-notes><pub-date><day>5</day><month>September</month><year>2018</year></pub-date>
      
      <volume>45</volume>
      <fpage>259</fpage><lpage>265</lpage>
      <history>
        <date date-type="received"><day>31</day><month>May</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="rev-recd"><day>30</day><month>July</month><year>2018</year></date>
           <date date-type="accepted"><day>5</day><month>August</month><year>2018</year></date>
      </history>
      <permissions>
        
        
      <license license-type="open-access"><license-p>This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this licence, visit <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/</ext-link></license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/45/259/2018/adgeo-45-259-2018.html">This article is available from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/45/259/2018/adgeo-45-259-2018.html</self-uri><self-uri xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/45/259/2018/adgeo-45-259-2018.pdf">The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/45/259/2018/adgeo-45-259-2018.pdf</self-uri>
      <abstract>
    <p id="d1e90">A number of metallic elements are inherited from waste during
thermal treatment and concentrated in the incineration residues. Because the
major part of the incineration residue mass are bottom ashes (BAs), their
study is of great importance from the point of view of their environmental
impact or resource potential. The general focus of this study was on the
minor metallic elements present in BAs. They co-occurred with main phases
and often determined the inherited potential of the material. The analysed
residues were produced from municipal and industrial waste. The BAs were
studied using spectroscopic methods of chemical microanalysis: energy
dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) and wavelength dispersive X-ray
spectrometry (WDX). Both the main and minor metallic elements were
concentrated in metallic components. They were typically present as separate
grains and metallic inclusions (commonly in the glass matrix of the grains)
ranging in size from several to hundreds of micrometres. Despite Fe-, Al-
and Cu-rich occurrences, metallic elements rarely occurred in fragments
composed of a single element. Their main forms of occurrence were alloy
grains, admixtures in polymetallic occurrences and micro-inclusions in
glassy matrix. The content of particular elements in those forms was
investigated and described in greater detail. Even though two types of
bottom ash were formed from different types of waste and differences in used
technologies were present, the obtained materials contained metallic
components having similar attributes. Elevated concentrations of not only Fe
and Al, but also Ti, Cu and Zn, allow us to consider bottom ash as a
promising material from the point of view of metallic elements' recovery
(e.g. by the physical concentration of elements through gravity or magnetic
methods).</p>
  </abstract>
    </article-meta>
  </front>
<body>
      

<sec id="Ch1.S1" sec-type="intro">
  <title>Introduction</title>
      <p id="d1e100">Waste incineration is one of the most common treatment methods in waste
management. It allows waste mass and volume reduction. Nevertheless, it
causes growth in the worldwide production of waste incineration residues.
During thermal treatment, waste is detoxified and transformed into three
solid materials: bottom ash (BA), fly ash (FA) and air pollution control
(APC) residues. As concentrates of inflammable waste fraction, they are
composed of newly formed phases and components inherited from waste such as
metallic fragments, fragmented glass or ceramic (Chandler et al., 1997).
Elements inherited from waste are entrapped in incineration residues and
excluded from their natural cycles; therefore, procedures for the
post-treatment management or recycling of incineration residues need to be
developed. Most metallic elements concentrate in BAs thus, they might be
considered as a source of valuable components or waste-based raw material in
industrial applications (Funari et al., 2015; Lam et al., 2010; Kowalski et
al., 2016).</p>
      <p id="d1e103">BAs are heterogeneous grainy materials. Their composition is mainly
dependent on the local waste stream composition, applied waste management
system and technology of incineration. Besides amorphous and crystalline
components formed during incineration, BAs are rich in residual components
inherited from waste (often barely affected by high temperature). Also,
metallic components are present in the BAs, even if the recycling of metal
products is performed prior to the thermal treatment (Chandler et al., 1997;
Saffarzadeh et al., 2009; Wei et al., 2011). After thermal processing, the
next stage of recycling in the incineration plant is usually performed by
using single magnets or eddy-current separators. The process is effective
for the separation of large fragments of metal products released in the
furnace from waste. Nevertheless, it is not possible to recover single<?pagebreak page260?> or
small metal fragments without fragmentation of the BA grains.</p>
      <p id="d1e106">Common metallic elements such as Fe, Al and Mg are present in the BAs in the
highest amount, while up to a few wt % of other metallic elements is also
often present (e.g. Ti, Zn, Cu, Cr). Currently, it is considered that the
recovery of single elements might not be economically reasonable because of
the presence of easy accessible natural or secondary resources. Nevertheless,
incineration residues could be treated as easily accessible, produced
continuously in large amounts, and a waste-based source of at least a few
metallic elements (Kuo et al., 2007). From this point of view, the value of
elements also present in minority might be encouraging for developing
procedures of their separation and recovery. For the estimation of BAs'
resource potential, the basic studies of minor metallic elements are of great
importance. Based on this presumption, the main focus of this study was on
BAs' minor metallic elements, especially those present as side elements in
alloys and dispersed within various BA phases. We also focus on the
distribution of minor metallic elements within the phases in two types of BA
produced from waste generated in households and industry.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2">
  <?xmltex \opttitle{Materials {\&} analytical methods}?><title>Materials &amp; analytical methods</title>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS1">
  <title>Bottom ashes sampling and used incineration technologies</title>
      <p id="d1e121">To investigate minor metallic components in waste incineration BAs, 285 kg
of the material in total was collected from two operating plants located in
Poland during several sampling campaigns (in the years from 2015 to 2018).</p>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e127">Averaged content of major elements in BAs from waste incineration.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="11">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="62pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="justify" colwidth="22pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">element (wt %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">Si</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">Ca</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Fe</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Na</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Al</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Mg</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Ti</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">C<inline-formula><mml:math id="M3" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">S<inline-formula><mml:math id="M4" display="inline"><mml:msub><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">tot</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:math></inline-formula></oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">LOI</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSWI BA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M5" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">24.98 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">11.72 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.80 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2.4</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">4.97 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">4.00 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.7</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.00 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">0.45 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">0.40 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">0.33 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">1.22 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.7</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IHWI BA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M6" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">14.51 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.6</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">8.37 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">6.73 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6.22 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">5.32 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1.06 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.2</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">3.01 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1.1</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">10.42 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4.9</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">1.73 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>0.3</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">14.7 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>6.6</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e130"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M1" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Averaged values based on analysis of 9 samples.
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M2" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Averaged values based on analysis of 7 samples. SD – standard
deviation. </p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

<?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><table-wrap id="Ch1.T2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e377">Averaged content of minor elements in BAs from waste incineration.</p></caption><oasis:table frame="topbot"><oasis:tgroup cols="13">
     <oasis:colspec colnum="1" colname="col1" align="justify" colwidth="62pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="2" colname="col2" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="3" colname="col3" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="4" colname="col4" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="5" colname="col5" align="justify" colwidth="28pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="6" colname="col6" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="7" colname="col7" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="8" colname="col8" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="9" colname="col9" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="10" colname="col10" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="11" colname="col11" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="12" colname="col12" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:colspec colnum="13" colname="col13" align="justify" colwidth="23pt"/>
     <oasis:thead>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">element (wt %)</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">K</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">P</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">Cu</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">Zn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">Mn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">Cr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">Pb</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">Zr</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">Sn</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">Ni</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">Co</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M14" display="inline"><mml:mo>∑</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>REE</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:thead>
     <oasis:tbody>
       <oasis:row rowsep="1">
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">MSWI BA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M15" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">6656 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>570</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">3422 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>616</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">1290 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>567</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">1229<inline-formula><mml:math id="M16" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>985</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">645 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>126</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">552 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>278</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">277<inline-formula><mml:math id="M17" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>355</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">208 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>37</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">174 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>107</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">56 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>19</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">43 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>12</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">88 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>12</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
       <oasis:row>
         <oasis:entry colname="col1">IHWI BA<inline-formula><mml:math id="M18" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>SD</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col2">5088 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>947</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col3">6072 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>2145</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col4">3635 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>1561</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col5">6433<inline-formula><mml:math id="M19" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>4436</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col6">1582 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>689</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col7">1534 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>516</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col8">486<inline-formula><mml:math id="M20" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>496</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col9">696 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>258</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col10">561 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>480</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col11">806 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>295</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col12">240 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>109</oasis:entry>
         <oasis:entry colname="col13">262 <?xmltex \hack{\hfill\break}?>137</oasis:entry>
       </oasis:row>
     </oasis:tbody>
   </oasis:tgroup></oasis:table><table-wrap-foot><p id="d1e380"><inline-formula><mml:math id="M7" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">a</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Averaged values based on analysis of 9 samples. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M8" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">b</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> Averaged values based on analysis of 7 samples. <inline-formula><mml:math id="M9" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">c</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> In 1 sample:
0.39 wt % Zn; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M10" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">d</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 1 sample: 0.13 wt % Pb; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M11" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">e</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 3 samples: 0.9–1.2 wt % Zn; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M12" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">f</mml:mi></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> in 2 samples: <inline-formula><mml:math id="M13" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.12</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt % Pb. SD – standard
deviation.</p></table-wrap-foot></table-wrap>

      <p id="d1e731">Twelve samples of BA were collected from a municipal solid waste incineration
(MSWI) plant (155 kg). Each sample represented an averaged portion of fresh
material and was collected from a depth of 30 cm on an uncovered heap.
According to the European List of Waste (EPA, 2002), this type of BA (waste
code: 19 01 12) is categorised as “bottom ash and slag other than those
mentioned in 19 01 11* (* bottom ash and slag containing dangerous
substances)”. The plant is now under reconstruction (planned efficiency of
waste incineration will be 300 000 t yr<inline-formula><mml:math id="M21" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>),
but at the time when the samples were collected it was incinerating up to
55 000 t of waste every year. The plant was equipped with a shaft furnace,
where waste (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M22" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">8</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> t h<inline-formula><mml:math id="M23" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mrow><mml:mo>-</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>) was thermally treated for 30–120 min at
temperatures ranging from 950 to 1100 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M24" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. Hot BA was cooled with
water and stored on an uncovered heap. Through a technological process,
products composed of ferrous metals were separated from the BA manually and
by using magnetic separators. Flue gases from the furnace were led to an APC
system where in a few steps the ashes and residues were separated, heat was
recovered and gases were treated to neutralise its toxic and hazardous
components (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M25" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M26" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HCl, HF, toxic
metallic elements, dioxins, furans and organic pollutants) (Malczewski and
Nadulski, 2010). In this plant BA, APC and FA were produced in the
proportions of 91.5 %, 7 % and 1.5 %, respectively (Kowalski et al.,
2017).</p>
      <p id="d1e800">The second group of BA samples was collected in an industrial and hazardous
waste incineration (IHWI) plant. This BA is categorised as “bottom ash and
slag containing dangerous substances” (waste code: 19 01 11*). Because of
strict safety regulations, the samples were prepared by incineration plant
employees. Seven samples of fresh BA were collected at the end of the
technological line (130 kg). The BA was produced in the incineration plant,
where <inline-formula><mml:math id="M27" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">800</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> categories of waste (including 379 hazardous types) are
thermally treated. The plant is equipped with a rotary furnace, which is able
to incinerate up to 50 000 t of waste per year. The incineration time was
25–60 min and the temperatures ranged from 900 to 1150 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M28" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>C. After
incineration the BA is cooled with water, and during transportation to
storing containers, fragments of ferrous metal products are separated using
magnetic separators. The installation is equipped with an advanced
multi-stage APC system to recover energy and deal with elevated content of
toxic and hazardous components of flue gases. This is a combination of
washers, dryers, filters and absorbers, used for effective removal of Hg,
HCl, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M29" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M30" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">NO</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>, HF, dioxins, furans, PCBs
and toxic metallic elements (Pikoń and Grabski, 2006). In this plant, BA
and APC are produced in weight at the proportion of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M31" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">70</mml:mn><mml:mo>:</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">30</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>.</p>
      <p id="d1e856">Additionally to the BA samples, four samples of FA (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M32" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg) and eight
samples of APC residues (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M33" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">40</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> kg) were collected and analysed in
parallel.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS2">
  <title>Sample preparation</title>
      <p id="d1e885">Prior to analysis, BA samples from both incineration plants were dried and
averaged using Retsch sample splitters. After the removal of fragments of
metal products that could not be crushed or milled (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M34" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt % of the MSWI
BA and 1–2 wt % of the IHWI BA samples), the BAs were crushed using a jaw
crusher (tungsten carbide crushing elements). For chemical analysis, the BAs
were milled in a Retsch planetary ball mill for 20 min (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M35" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>×</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">10</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> min,
250 rpm, tungsten carbide grinding elements). For quantitative X-ray
diffraction, the samples were crushed to 0.4 mm and milled in a McCrone
micronising mill (in alcohol, 10 min, samples analysed as disoriented
specimen).</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S2.SS3">
  <title>Analytical methods</title>
      <p id="d1e916">In both types of BA, the content of residual components was determined. From
1 kg of each sample, fragmented metal products and other heat-resistant
components were manually separated and weighed. In the MSWI BA, they were
primarily represented by fragmented glass and ceramic products.</p>
      <p id="d1e919">The BAs' chemical composition was determined by Bureau Veritas Upstream
Minerals (formerly AcmeLabs<?pagebreak page261?> Analytical Laboratories Ltd.) in Vancouver,
Canada. The elements' content was measured by inductively coupled plasma
optical emission and mass spectrometry (ICP-OES and ICP-MS, respectively).
The total content of C and S were also measured using a LECO combustion
analysis and loss on ignition (LOI) was estimated based on the thermal
method.</p>
      <p id="d1e922">The BAs' mineral composition was determined using X-ray powder diffraction.
Measurements were performed in the angle range of 2–70<inline-formula><mml:math id="M36" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula> 2<inline-formula><mml:math id="M37" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Θ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>
using a Philips X'Pert APD diffractometer (goniometer PW3020, curved graphite
crystal monochromator, CuK<inline-formula><mml:math id="M38" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="italic">α</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula> radiation) with a step of 0.02<inline-formula><mml:math id="M39" display="inline"><mml:msup><mml:mi/><mml:mo>∘</mml:mo></mml:msup></mml:math></inline-formula>
per 5 s for quantitative analyses. Interpretations were made based on the
database of the Mineralogical Society of America (Downs and Hall-Wallace,
2003) and SEIFERT AutoQuan software was used for the quantitative
calculations (based on the Rietveld refinement method and the addition of
internal standard: 10 wt % of ZnO.</p>
      <p id="d1e957">Analyses of BAs in polished thin sections and micro-spot analyses were
performed using a Hitachi S-4700 field emission scanning electron microscope
(FE-SEM; operating voltage of 20 kV, time for standardless microanalysis
100 s, specimen coated with carbon) equipped with a Thermo Noran energy
dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) analyser (several hundred EDX analyses of
metallic components were made) and a JEOL Superprobe JXA-8230 electron
microprobe equipped with 5 wavelength dispersive X-ray spectrometry (WDX)
detectors (calibration with standards, beam size 10 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M40" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m,
accelerating voltage 20 kV, 19 elements measured including direct
measurement of O, specimen coated with carbon). Six samples were analysed
using the microprobe. From each material, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M41" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">300</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> spot analyses were made
(most of them were focused on metallic components). The size distribution of
metallic components was determined by measuring their sizes in two dimensions
using SEM images.</p>
</sec>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S3">
  <title>Results and discussion</title>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F1" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e986">MSWI BA WDX maps. Glassy matrix of the BA grain rich in metallic
inclusions (mostly Fe-Mn-rich inclusions).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/45/259/2018/adgeo-45-259-2018-f01.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <?xmltex \floatpos{t}?><fig id="Ch1.F2" specific-use="star"><caption><p id="d1e997">IHWI BA WDX maps. BA grain rich in metallic inclusions (Fe-Mn-Ti
dominated).</p></caption>
        <?xmltex \igopts{width=426.791339pt}?><graphic xlink:href="https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/45/259/2018/adgeo-45-259-2018-f02.jpg"/>

      </fig>

      <p id="d1e1006">The BAs were materials rich in Si, Ca, Fe, Na and Al. In lower amounts, Mg,
Ti, C and S were present (Table 1). In comparison to the MSWI BA, the IHWI BA
had less Si and Ca, similar content of Fe, Mg and usually slightly higher
content of other main elements. In both types of BAs, the content of
particular elements varied in some range when comparing single samples
collected in different sampling campaigns (standard deviation values for the
analysed group of samples are given for each value in Tables 1 and 2). The
IHWI BA chemical composition was less uniform, which could be expected due to
the fact that the output waste mixture was much more diversified than the
MSWI BA. Additionally, Chandler et al. (1997) reported the variability of BA
chemical composition mostly as a result of changes in the incinerated waste
composition, but also as a result of the effectiveness of the waste
management system and the used techniques of waste pre-treatment and BA
valorisation in the incineration plant. In contrast to the variability of
chemical composition, BA from the industrial waste was macroscopically more
homogeneous and contained smaller amounts of residual components (only
0.5 wt %–2.0 wt % of metallic fragments). The MSWI BA contained
25 wt %–35 wt % of fragmented glass, 2.5 wt %–5.5 wt % of metal
and 2.0 wt %–7.0 wt % of ceramic products.</p>
      <p id="d1e1010">The chemical composition of the BAs was reflected in their phase composition.
Both types of BA contained a high amount of amorphous phase, mostly
represented by<?pagebreak page262?> silicate glass, although its content was higher in the IHWI BA
(55 wt %–65 wt % in MSWI BA vs. 65 wt %–80 wt % in IHWI BA)
(Kowalski et al., 2017). Crystalline phase was composed of several phases in
both types of BA. The main minerals were silicates and aluminosilicates
containing Ca and alkalis, carbonates and oxides. In smaller amounts
phosphates, sulphates and chlorides were present. The MSWI BA contained more
quartz (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M42" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), and melilite group minerals
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M43" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mg</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Si</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M44" display="inline"><mml:mo>-</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M45" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Al</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">AlSiO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">7</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), whereas the
IHWI BA was rich in sulphate minerals (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M46" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> <inline-formula><mml:math id="M47" display="inline"><mml:mo>⋅</mml:mo></mml:math></inline-formula>
<inline-formula><mml:math id="M48" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">nH</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M49" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>; <inline-formula><mml:math id="M50" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Na</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">SO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>), calcite
(<inline-formula><mml:math id="M51" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Ca</mml:mi><mml:mo>[</mml:mo><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">CO</mml:mi><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:msub><mml:mo>]</mml:mo></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>) and Fe-oxides (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M52" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Fe</mml:mi><mml:mi>x</mml:mi></mml:msub><mml:msub><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">O</mml:mi><mml:mi>y</mml:mi></mml:msub></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>).</p>
      <p id="d1e1196">In both types of BA, the group of minor elements was dominated by metallic
elements. Ti, Cu, Zn, Mn and Cr were the most important (Table 2). Kuo et
al. (2007) concluded that Cu, Zn, Cr and Pb from the group of minor metallic
elements were concentrated mostly in the BA and are promising from the point
of view of their recovery. Similar to the major elements, the content of
minor components was diversified, which made the estimation of averaged
values difficult, and for the average data to be reliable it was necessary to
analyse a significant amount of the material. In general, the IHWI BA had
remarkably higher content of minor metallic elements, and despite the level
of variability this material seems to be more promising from the point of
view of the metallic elements' recovery. Also in this material, in some
samples a much higher content of particular elements was detected (e.g. in
IHWI BA <inline-formula><mml:math id="M53" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">1</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt % of Zn) (Table 2).</p>
      <p id="d1e1209">If considering the total content of metallic elements (Al, Fe, Mg, Ti, Mn,
Cr, Ni, Mo, Cu, Pb, Zn and Sn), they constituted <inline-formula><mml:math id="M54" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&gt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">12.7</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt %
(8.8 wt %–17.1 wt %) of the MSWI BA and <inline-formula><mml:math id="M55" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">17.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt %
(11.5 wt %–23.1 wt %) of the IHWI BA. In both materials, <inline-formula><mml:math id="M56" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">2</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>–<inline-formula><mml:math id="M57" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">4</mml:mn><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">5</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula>
of the given amounts were Fe and Al. Metallic elements in both BA types were
mostly concentrated in the form of metallic fragments, mainly as metallic
inclusions (in the size of 1–15 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M58" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and separated metallic grains
(in the size of 50–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M59" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m). Those occurrences were dominated by
Fe- and Al-rich fragments, whereas others (Cu, Zn, Ni and very few Pb, Ti,
Cr, Sn-rich metallic fragments) were present less frequently. Similar forms
and types of metallic occurrences were described by Wei et al. (2011). Also
Funari et al. (2015) concluded that metallic elements are mostly concentrated
in the fine-grained fraction of BAs and concentrations of some of them (e.g.
Cu, Zn, Pb, Ni) are<?pagebreak page263?> close to values in low-grade ores. Most of the minor
metallic elements in the BA were admixtures in multi-element metallic
occurrences and other non-metallic phases. In the MSWI BA (based on WDX
analysis), the usual content of Pb in the BA components was <inline-formula><mml:math id="M60" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>&lt;</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.15</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt %.
Pb usually co-occurred with Fe, Sn or Zn and was rarely present in the glass.
From 25 wt % to 85 wt % of the Pb contained Pb-rich occurrences and
sulphides. Cu was mostly present in a form of metallic fragments containing
35 wt %–85 wt % of the element (also several wt % in sulphides).
Rarely, 0.1 wt %–0.5 wt % of Cu was measured in the composition of Fe-
and Al-rich grains. From 0.1 to 0.5 wt % of <inline-formula><mml:math id="M61" display="inline"><mml:mrow class="chem"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Mn</mml:mi><mml:mo>/</mml:mo><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">Cr</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> were usually
present in Fe-rich occurrences. Several percent of them were present in
alloys with Al, Fe and Cr (Mn) or Fe, Pb and Mn (Cr). Zn was usually measured
in Fe-rich grains in low amounts (0.1 wt %–0.3 wt %), but
30 wt %–90 wt % was present in Zn-rich occurrences and sulphides.</p>
      <p id="d1e1293">In the IHWI BA components (based on WDX analysis), Cu
(0.2 wt %–4.0 wt %) was present mainly in multi-element metallic
occurrences. Higher content was detected in the composition of sulphides
(20 wt %–40 wt %) and Cu-dominated fragments (50 wt %–80 wt %).
Pb (0.1 wt %–0.3 wt %) was present in Fe-, Al- and Sn-rich metallic
fragments. In Pb-rich occurrences, its content reached 50 wt %–90 wt %.
Zn usually occured in multi-element occurrences and its content was in a
range of 0.2 wt %–2.0 wt %. Higher values of Zn
(20 wt %–50 wt %) were present in sulphides and occurrences dominated
by Fe. Cr (0.1 wt %–1.0 wt %) was usually measured within Fe-, Al- or
Ti-rich fragments. Higher amounts of the element (15 wt %–25 wt %) were
present in multi-element occurrences. Mn was commonly present in various
metallic fragments but its content was usually below 0.5 wt %.</p>
      <p id="d1e1296">As presented in Figs. 1 and 2, microprobe WDX maps were generated in areas of
glassy matrix containing grains rich in metallic inclusions. The results
indicated that Al and Fe were concentrated mostly in discrete grains and
large inclusions often containing several other elements in low amounts. Mn
and Cu were present as minor components of metallic occurrences. Ti occurred
in marginal zones of metallic Fe-rich fragments, Cr was concentrated in the
form of micro-inclusions, while Sn and Pb were dispersed evenly with local
spots of enrichment. This type of pattern was common among the glassy matrix
of the BA grains where<?pagebreak page264?> metallic inclusions were present. Areas of local
enrichment in metallic elements were usually surrounding groups of metallic
inclusions. As suggested by Saffarzadeh et al. (2009), metallic components
could be fixed within the silica-rich matrix as a result of complex reactions
in the furnace. This reaction seems to immobilise metals and make their
recovery difficult, since silica is known to be a stabilising agent for heavy
metals (Rodella et al., 2017). Minor metallic elements occurred in various
types of BAs; they were present in similar forms and occurred as
multi-element associations. Allegrini et al. (2014) estimated the recovery
efficiency for Fe and nonferrous metals to be 85 % and 61 %,
respectively, which enables us to consider BA as an easily accessible and
cheap waste-based source of important elements. Nevertheless, the recovery
processes could be impeded because advanced recovery techniques need to be
applied for dispersed elements or those entrapped within a number of phases
(often as trace components), while the multiplicity of metallic fragments'
chemical composition might be problematic, since a number of them contained a
high amount of Al and Fe.</p>
</sec>
<sec id="Ch1.S4" sec-type="conclusions">
  <title>Conclusions</title>
      <p id="d1e1305">Despite the differences in composition and type of waste they originate from,
a number of similarities occurred during the analysis of both types of BA.
They were composed of similar mineral phases, types of grains and had
remarkably similar internal structures. Metallic elements represent
8.8 wt %–23.1 wt % of the BA (more metallic elements were concentrated
in the IHWI BA). Besides high content of Fe and Al (ca.
10.8 wt %–12.1 wt %), the elevated content of Ti (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M62" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">3.0</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt %
in the IHWI BA), Cu (0.1 wt %–0.4 wt %) and Zn (<inline-formula><mml:math id="M63" display="inline"><mml:mrow><mml:mo>∼</mml:mo><mml:mn mathvariant="normal">0.6</mml:mn></mml:mrow></mml:math></inline-formula> wt % in
the IHWI BA) was measured. The BAs' chemical composition was diversified, but
these variations did not affect the forms of metallic occurrences. Metallic
elements were concentrated in both types of BA in the form of metallic
inclusions (in the size of 1–15  <inline-formula><mml:math id="M64" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m) and separate metallic grains
(in the size of 50–300 <inline-formula><mml:math id="M65" display="inline"><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">µ</mml:mi></mml:math></inline-formula>m), mostly in the form of a few elements'
occurrences. More metallic grains were present in the IHWI BA, despite the
material being more diversified.</p>
      <p id="d1e1342">Minor metallic elements present in the BAs might be interesting from the
point of view of their recovery. The most promising in terms of their
recovery are occurrences dominated by a particular element, where its content
is usually much higher than 50 wt %, and when the metallic fragment is in
the form of a separate grain or a component weakly bonded in the grains'
aggregate.</p>
</sec>

      
      </body>
    <back><notes notes-type="dataavailability">

      <p id="d1e1350">Jagiellonian University is the owner of the data, which can be released by the corresponding author on a reasonable request.</p>
  </notes><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?><notes notes-type="authorcontribution">

      <p id="d1e1357">PRK collected samples, performed analysis, analysed the data and wrote the paper. MK helped PRK with sampling, data acquisition and interpretations. MM designed and supervised this work and approved the manuscript.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="competinginterests">

      <p id="d1e1363">The authors declare that they have no conflict of
interest.</p>
  </notes><notes notes-type="sistatement">

      <p id="d1e1369">This article is part of the special issue “European Geosciences
Union General Assembly 2018, EGU Division Energy, Resources &amp; Environment
(ERE)”. It is a result of the EGU General Assembly 2018, Vienna, Austria,
8–13 April 2018.</p>
  </notes><ack><title>Acknowledgements</title><p id="d1e1375">This research was funded by the Polish National Science Centre, scientific
grant no. UMO-2014/15/B/ST10/04171. The authors appreciate the cooperation of the incineration plant executives
(who permitted the site visits and sampling), assistance of   Juraj Majzlan and technical support of   Stefan Kiefer during EDX data acquisition
(Institut für Geowissenschaften, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität, Jena, Germany).<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?><?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Edited by: Christopher Juhlin
<?xmltex \hack{\newline}?>Reviewed by: Christopher Juhlin and one anonymous referee</p></ack><ref-list>
    <title>References</title>

      <ref id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>Allegrini, E., Maresca, A., Olsson, M. E., Holtze, M. S., Boldrin, A., and
Astrup, T. F.: Quantification of the resource recovery potential of municipal
solid waste incineration bottom ashes, Waste Manage., 34, 1627–1636,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.003" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.003</ext-link>, 2014.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Chandler, A. J., Eighmy, T. T, Hartlén, J., Hjelmar, O., Kosson, D. S.,
Sawell, S. E., van der Sloot, H. A., and Vehlow, J.: Municipal solid waste
incineration residues, Stud. Environ. Sci., 67,  174–202, 339–418, 734–740,
1997.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Downs, R. T. and Hall-Wallace, M.: The American Mineralogist crystal
structure database, Am. Mineral., 88, 247–250,
2003.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): European Waste Catalogue and
Hazardous Waste List, Ireland, ISBN:1-84095-083-8, 2002.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Funari, V., Braga, R., Bokhari, S. N. H., Dinelli, E., and Meisel, T.: Solid
residues from Italian municipal solid waste incinerators: A source for
“critical” raw materials, Waste Manage., 45, 206–216,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.005" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.005</ext-link>, 2015.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Kowalski, P. R., Kasina, M., and Michalik, M.: Metallic elements
fractionation in municipal solid waste incineration residues, Energy
Procedia, 97, 31–36, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.013" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.013</ext-link>, 2016.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Kowalski, P. R., Kasina, M., and Michalik, M.: Metallic elements occurrences
in the municipal waste incineration bottom ash, Energy Proced., 125, 56–62,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.060" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.060</ext-link>, 2017.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Kuo, N. W., Ma, H. W., Yang, Y. M., Hsiao, T. Y., and Huang, C. M.: An
investigation on the potential of metal recovery from the<?pagebreak page265?> municipal waste
incinerator In Taiwan, Waste Manage., 27, 1673–1679,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.009" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.009</ext-link>, 2007.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Lam, C. H. K., Ip, A. W. M., Barford, J. P., and McKay, G.: Use of
Incineration MSW Ash: A Review, Sustainability, 2, 1943–1968,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su2071943" ext-link-type="DOI">10.3390/su2071943</ext-link>, 2010.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Malczewski, J. and Nadulski, P.: Thermal treatment of wastes in ZUSOK –
operational experience, VII Conference: “Dla Miasta i
Środowiska – Problemy Unieszkodliwiania Odpadów”, Conference
materials, 61–65, 2010 (in Polish).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Pikoń, K. and Grabski, T.: Incineration of hazardous waste – case study, Archiwum Gospodarki Odpadami i Ochrony Środowiska, 4,
57–68, 2006 (in Polish).</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Rodella, N., Bosio, A., Dalipi, R., Zacco, A., Borgese, L., Depero, L.
E., and Bontempi, E.: Waste silica sources as heavy metal stabilizers for
municipal solid waste incineration fly ash, Arab. J. Chem., 10, 3676–3681,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.04.006" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.04.006</ext-link>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref><?xmltex \hack{\newpage}?>
      <ref id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Saffarzadeh, A., Shimaoka, T., Motomura, Y., and Watanabe, K.:
Characterization study of heavy metal-bearing phases in MSW slag, J. Hazard.
Mater., 164, 829–834, <ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.093" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.093</ext-link>, 2009.</mixed-citation></ref>
      <ref id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Wei, Y., Shimaoka, T., Saffarzadeh, A. and Takahashi, F.: Mineralogical
characterization of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash with an
emphasis on heavy metal-bearing phases, J. Hazard. Mater., 187, 534–543,
<ext-link xlink:href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2011.01.070" ext-link-type="DOI">10.1016/j.hazmat.2011.01.070</ext-link>, 2011.</mixed-citation></ref>

  </ref-list></back>
    <!--<article-title-html>Distribution of minor metallic elements within waste incineration bottom ashes defined by WDX/EDX spectrometry</article-title-html>
<abstract-html><p>A number of metallic elements are inherited from waste during
thermal treatment and concentrated in the incineration residues. Because the
major part of the incineration residue mass are bottom ashes (BAs), their
study is of great importance from the point of view of their environmental
impact or resource potential. The general focus of this study was on the
minor metallic elements present in BAs. They co-occurred with main phases
and often determined the inherited potential of the material. The analysed
residues were produced from municipal and industrial waste. The BAs were
studied using spectroscopic methods of chemical microanalysis: energy
dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDX) and wavelength dispersive X-ray
spectrometry (WDX). Both the main and minor metallic elements were
concentrated in metallic components. They were typically present as separate
grains and metallic inclusions (commonly in the glass matrix of the grains)
ranging in size from several to hundreds of micrometres. Despite Fe-, Al-
and Cu-rich occurrences, metallic elements rarely occurred in fragments
composed of a single element. Their main forms of occurrence were alloy
grains, admixtures in polymetallic occurrences and micro-inclusions in
glassy matrix. The content of particular elements in those forms was
investigated and described in greater detail. Even though two types of
bottom ash were formed from different types of waste and differences in used
technologies were present, the obtained materials contained metallic
components having similar attributes. Elevated concentrations of not only Fe
and Al, but also Ti, Cu and Zn, allow us to consider bottom ash as a
promising material from the point of view of metallic elements' recovery
(e.g. by the physical concentration of elements through gravity or magnetic
methods).</p></abstract-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib1"><label>1</label><mixed-citation>
Allegrini, E., Maresca, A., Olsson, M. E., Holtze, M. S., Boldrin, A., and
Astrup, T. F.: Quantification of the resource recovery potential of municipal
solid waste incineration bottom ashes, Waste Manage., 34, 1627–1636,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.003" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.05.003</a>, 2014.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib2"><label>2</label><mixed-citation>Chandler, A. J., Eighmy, T. T, Hartlén, J., Hjelmar, O., Kosson, D. S.,
Sawell, S. E., van der Sloot, H. A., and Vehlow, J.: Municipal solid waste
incineration residues, Stud. Environ. Sci., 67,  174–202, 339–418, 734–740,
1997.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib3"><label>3</label><mixed-citation>Downs, R. T. and Hall-Wallace, M.: The American Mineralogist crystal
structure database, Am. Mineral., 88, 247–250,
2003.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib4"><label>4</label><mixed-citation>Environmental Protection Agency (EPA): European Waste Catalogue and
Hazardous Waste List, Ireland, ISBN:1-84095-083-8, 2002.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib5"><label>5</label><mixed-citation>Funari, V., Braga, R., Bokhari, S. N. H., Dinelli, E., and Meisel, T.: Solid
residues from Italian municipal solid waste incinerators: A source for
“critical” raw materials, Waste Manage., 45, 206–216,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.005" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.11.005</a>, 2015.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib6"><label>6</label><mixed-citation>Kowalski, P. R., Kasina, M., and Michalik, M.: Metallic elements
fractionation in municipal solid waste incineration residues, Energy
Procedia, 97, 31–36, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.013" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.10.013</a>, 2016.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib7"><label>7</label><mixed-citation>Kowalski, P. R., Kasina, M., and Michalik, M.: Metallic elements occurrences
in the municipal waste incineration bottom ash, Energy Proced., 125, 56–62,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.060" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.08.060</a>, 2017.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib8"><label>8</label><mixed-citation>Kuo, N. W., Ma, H. W., Yang, Y. M., Hsiao, T. Y., and Huang, C. M.: An
investigation on the potential of metal recovery from the municipal waste
incinerator In Taiwan, Waste Manage., 27, 1673–1679,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.009" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.11.009</a>, 2007.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib9"><label>9</label><mixed-citation>Lam, C. H. K., Ip, A. W. M., Barford, J. P., and McKay, G.: Use of
Incineration MSW Ash: A Review, Sustainability, 2, 1943–1968,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/su2071943" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/su2071943</a>, 2010.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib10"><label>10</label><mixed-citation>Malczewski, J. and Nadulski, P.: Thermal treatment of wastes in ZUSOK –
operational experience, VII Conference: “Dla Miasta i
Środowiska – Problemy Unieszkodliwiania Odpadów”, Conference
materials, 61–65, 2010 (in Polish).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib11"><label>11</label><mixed-citation>Pikoń, K. and Grabski, T.: Incineration of hazardous waste – case study, Archiwum Gospodarki Odpadami i Ochrony Środowiska, 4,
57–68, 2006 (in Polish).
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib12"><label>12</label><mixed-citation>Rodella, N., Bosio, A., Dalipi, R., Zacco, A., Borgese, L., Depero, L.
E., and Bontempi, E.: Waste silica sources as heavy metal stabilizers for
municipal solid waste incineration fly ash, Arab. J. Chem., 10, 3676–3681,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.04.006" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.04.006</a>, 2017.

</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib13"><label>13</label><mixed-citation>Saffarzadeh, A., Shimaoka, T., Motomura, Y., and Watanabe, K.:
Characterization study of heavy metal-bearing phases in MSW slag, J. Hazard.
Mater., 164, 829–834, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.093" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.093</a>, 2009.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>
<ref-html id="bib1.bib14"><label>14</label><mixed-citation>Wei, Y., Shimaoka, T., Saffarzadeh, A. and Takahashi, F.: Mineralogical
characterization of municipal solid waste incineration bottom ash with an
emphasis on heavy metal-bearing phases, J. Hazard. Mater., 187, 534–543,
<a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2011.01.070" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hazmat.2011.01.070</a>, 2011.
</mixed-citation></ref-html>--></article>
