ADGEO Advances in Geosciences ADGEO Adv. Geosci. 1680-7359 Copernicus Publications Göttingen, Germany 10.5194/adgeo-29-1-2011 Hydrological ensemble forecasting at ungauged basins: using neighbour catchments for model setup and updating Randrianasolo A. 1 Ramos M. H. 1 Andréassian V. 1 Cemagref, UR HBAN, Parc de Tourvoie, BP 44, 92163, Antony, France 25 02 2011 29 1 11 Copyright: © 2011 A. Randrianasolo et al. 2011 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is available from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/29/1/2011/adgeo-29-1-2011.html The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/29/1/2011/adgeo-29-1-2011.pdf

In flow forecasting, additionally to the need of long time series of historic discharges for model setup and calibration, hydrological models also need real-time discharge data for the updating of the initial conditions at the time of the forecasts. The need of data challenges operational flow forecasting at ungauged or poorly gauged sites. This study evaluates the performance of different choices of parameter sets and discharge updates to run a flow forecasting model at ungauged sites, based on information from neighbour catchments. A cross-validation approach is applied on a set of 211 catchments in France and a 17-month forecasting period is used to calculate skill scores and evaluate the quality of the forecasts. A reference situation, where local information is available, is compared to alternative situations, which include scenarios where no local data is available at all and scenarios where local data started to be collected at the beginning of the forecasting period. To cope with uncertainties from rainfall forecasts, the model is driven by ensemble weather forecasts from the PEARP-Météo-France ensemble prediction system. The results show that neighbour catchments can contribute to provide forecasts of good quality at ungauged sites, especially with the transfer of parameter sets for model simulation. The added value of local data for the operational updating of the hydrological ensemble forecasts is highlighted.

 References %Berthet, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Javelle P.: How crucial is it %to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? %Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments. %Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 13: 819-831, 2009. Berthet, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., and Javelle, P.: How crucial is it to account for the antecedent moisture conditions in flood forecasting? Comparison of event-based and continuous approaches on 178 catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 819–831, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-13-819-2009, 2009. Cloke, H. L. and Pappenberger, F.: Ensemble flood forecasting: A review, J. Hydrol., 375, 613–626, 2009. Edijatno, S., Nascimento, N., Yang, X., Makhlouf, Z., and Michel, C.: GR3J: a daily watershed model with three free parameters, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 44(2), 263–278, 1999. Haché, M., Ouarda, T.B.M.J., Bruneau, P., and Bobée, B.: Estimation régionale par la méthode de l'analyse canonique des corrélations: comparaison des types de variables hydrologiques. Can. J. Civil. Eng., 29, 899–910, 2002. Jolliffe, I. T. and Stephenson D. B.: Forecast Verification. A Practitioner's Guide in Atmospheric Science, John Wiley and Sons, Chichester, West Sussex, England, 240~pp., 2003. Kay, A. L., Jones, D. A., Crooks, S. M., Calver, A., and Reynard, N. S.: A comparison of three approaches to spatial generalization of rainfall-runoff models, Hydrol. Process., 20, 3953–3973, 2007. Kitanidis, P. K. and Bras, R. L.: Real-time forecasting with a conceptual hydrologic model 2. Applications and results, Water Resour. Res., 16, 1034–1044, 1980. Kjeldsen, T. R. and Jones, D.: Estimation of an index flood using data transfer in the UK, Hydrolog. Sci. J., 52(1), 86–98, 2007. Kjeldsen, T. R. and Jones, D.: An exploratory analysis of error components in hydrological regression modelling, Water Resour. Res., 45, W02407, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006283, 2009. Kling, H. and Nachtnebel, H. P.: A method for the regional estimation of runoff separation parameters for hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol. , 364, 163–174, 2009. Masih, I., Uhlenbrook, S., Maskey, S, and Ahmad, M. D.: Regionalization of a conceptual rainfall-runoff model based on similarity of the flow duration curve: A case study from the semi-arid Karkheh basin, Iran, J. Hydrol., 391, 188–201, 2010. McIntyre, N., Lee, H., Wheater, H., Young, A., Wagener, T.: Ensemble predictions of runoff in ungauged catchments, Water Resour. Res., 41, W12434, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004289, 2005. Merz, R. and Blöschl, G.: Regionalisation of catchment model parameters. J. Hydrol., 287, 95–123, 2004. % % %Mimikou, M. and Kaemaki, S.: Regionalisation of flow duration %characteristics, J. Hydrol., 82, 77–91, 1985\blackbox\textbfnot cited in the text!. Murphy, A. H.: What is a good forecast? An essay on the nature of goodness in weather forecasting, Weather Forecast., 8, 281–293, 1993. % %Nathan, R. J. and McMahon, T. A.: Identification of homogeneous regions for %the purposes of regionalisation, J. Hydrol., 121, 217–238, 1990\blackbox\textbfnot cited in the text!. %Nicolau, J.: Short-range ensemble forecasting, in: Proceedings WMO/CBS Technical % Conferences On Data Processing and Forecasting Systems, \blackbox\textbfeditors?, Cairns, Australia, 4~p.\blackbox\textbftotal pages or single page?, %2002. Nicolau, J.: Short-range ensemble forecasting. In Proceedings WMO/CBS Technical Conferences On Data Processing and Forecasting Systems, Cairns, Australia, 2–3 December, 4~pp., available at: http://www.wmo.ch/pages/prog/www/DPS/TC-DPFS-2002/Papers-Posters/Topic1-Nicolau.pdf, 2002. Oudin, L., Hervieu, F., Michel, C., Perrin, C., Andréassian, V., Anctil, F., and Loumagne, C.: Which potential evapotranspiration input for a lumped rainfall-runoff model? Part 2 – Towards a simple and efficient potential evapotranspiration model for rainfall-runoff modelling, J. Hydrol., 303, 290–306, 2005. Oudin, L., Andreassian, V., Perrin, C.,Michel, C., and Lemoine, N.: Spatial proximity, physical similarity, regression and ungauged catchments: A comparison of regionalization approaches based on 913 French catchments. Water Resour. Res., 44, W03413, https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006240, 2008. Oudin, L., Kay, A. L., Andréassian, V., and Perrin, C.: Are seemingly physically similar catchments truly hydrologically similar?, Water Resour. Res., 46, W11558, https://doi.org/10.1029/2009WR008887, 2011. Ouarda, T., Ba, K. M., Diaz-Delgado, C., Carsteanu A., Chokmani, K., Gingras, H., Quentin, E., Trujillo, E., and Bobée, B.: Intercomparison of regional flood frequency estimation methods at ungauged sites for a Mexican case study, J. Hydrol., 348, 40–58, 2007. %Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: A comparison of regionalisation methods %for catchment model parameters. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9: 157-171, 2005. Parajka, J., Merz, R., and Blöschl, G.: A comparison of regionalisation methods for catchment model parameters, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 9, 157–171, https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-9-157-2005, 2005. Perrin, C., Michel, C., and Andréassian, V.: Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation, J. Hydrol., 279, 275–289, 2003. % %Perrin, C., Andreassian, V., Rojas Serna, C., Mathevet, T., and Le Moine, N.: %Discrete parameterization of hydrological models: evaluating the use of %parameter sets libraries over 900 catchments, Water Resour. Res., 44, W08447, %https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006579, 2008\blackbox\textbfnot cited in the text!. % % %Post, D. A., Jones, J. A., and Grant, G. E.: An improved methodology for predicting %the daily hydrologic response of ungauged catchments, Environ. Modell. %Softw., 13, 395–403, 1998\blackbox\textbfnot cited in the text!. Quintana-Seguí, P., Le Moigne, P., Durand, Y., Martin, E., Habets, F., Baillon, M., Canellas, C., Franchisteguy, L., and Morel, S.: Analysis of near-surface atmospheric variables: Validation of the SAFRAN analysis over France, J. Appl. Meteorol. Clim., 47(1), 92–107, 2008. Randrianasolo, A., Ramos, M.-H., Thirel, G., Andréassian V., and Martin, E.: Comparing the scores of hydrological ensemble forecasts issued by two different hydrological models, Atmos. Sci. Lett., 11(2), 100–107, 2010. Reichl, J. P. C., Western, A. W., McIntyre, N. R., and Chiew, F. H. S.: Optimization of a similarity measure for estimating ungauged streamflow, Water Resour. Res., 45, W10423, https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007248, 2009. Sivapalan, M., Takeuchi, K., Franks, S. W., Gupta, V. K.,~~Karambiri,~~H., Lakshmi,~~V.,~~Liang,~~X.,~~McDonnell,~~J ~J.,~~Mendiodo, \noindent E. M., O'Connell, P. E., Oki, T., Pomeroy, J. W., Schertzer, D., Uhlenbrook, S., and Zehe, E.: IAHS decade on prediction in ungauged basins (PUB), 2003–2012: shaping an exciting future for the hydrological sciences, J. Hydrolog. Sci., 48(6), 857–880, 2003. Thirel, G., Rousset-Regimbeau, F., Martin, E., and Habets, F.: On the impact of short-range meteorological forecasts for ensemble streamflow prediction, J. Hydrometeorol., 9, 1301–1317, 2008. Young, A. R.: Streamflow simulation within UK ungauged catchments using a daily rainfall-runoff model, J. Hydrol., 320, 155–172, 2006.