References

ADGEO

Advances in Geosciences

ADGEO

Adv. Geosci.

1680-7359

Copernicus Publications

Göttingen, Germany

10.5194/adgeo-16-63-2008

First results on a process-oriented rain area classification technique using Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI nighttime data

Thies

¹ Nauss

¹ Bendix

Laboratory for Climatology and Remote Sensing, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany

09 04 2008

16 63 72

2008

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/

This article is available from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/16/63/2008/adgeo-16-63-2008.html

The full text article is available as a PDF file from https://adgeo.copernicus.org/articles/16/63/2008/adgeo-16-63-2008.pdf

A new technique for process-oriented rain area classification using Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI nighttime data is introduced. It is based on a combination of the Advective Convective Technique (ACT) which focuses on precipitation areas connected to convective processes and the Rain Area Delineation Scheme during Nighttime (RADS-N) a new technique for the improved detection of stratiform precipitation areas (e.g. in connection with mid-latitude frontal systems). The ACT which uses positive brightness temperature differences between the water vapour (WV) and the infrared (IR) channels (ΔTWV-IR) for the detection of convective clouds and connected precipitating clouds has been transferred from Meteosat First Generation (MFG) Metesoat Visible and Infra-Red Imager radiometer (MVIRI) to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG) Spinning Enhanced Visible and InfraRed Imager (SEVIRI). RADS-N is based on the new conceptual model that precipitating cloud areas are characterised by a large cloud water path (cwp) and the presence of ice particles in the upper part of the cloud. The technique considers information about both parameters inherent in the channel differences ΔT3.9-10.8, ΔT3.9-7.3, ΔT8.7-10.8, and ΔT10.8-12.1, to detect potentially precipitating cloud areas. All four channel differences are used to gain implicit knowledge about the cwp. ΔT8.7-10.8 and ΔT10.8-12.1 are additionally considered to gain information about the cloud phase. First results of a comparison study between the classified rain areas and corresponding ground based radar data for precipitation events in connection with a cold front occlusion show encouraging performance of the new proposed process-oriented rain area classification scheme.

References 1

Adler, R. F. and Negri, A. J.: A satellite technique to estimate tropical convective and stratiform rainfall, J. Appl. Meteorol., 27, 30–51, 1988.

Bendix, J.: Adjustment of the Convective-Stratiform Technique to estimate 1991/92 El Nino rainfall distribution in Ecuador and Peru by means of Meteosat-3 data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 18, 1387–1394, 1997.

Bradley, P. S. and Fayyad, U. M.: Refining Initial Points for K-Means Clustering, In: Shavlik, J. (Edt.): Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Machine Learning, 91–99, 1998.

Cermak, J., Schneebeli, M., Nowak, D., Vuilleumier, L., and Bendix, J.: Characterization of Low Clouds With Satellite and Ground-Based Remote Sensing Systems, Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 15, 65–72, 2006.

DWD: Weather radar network, available online at http://www.dwd.de/en/Technik/Datengewinnung/Radarverbund/ Radarbroschuere_en.pdf, last access: 11~October~2007.

Ebert, E. E., Janowiak, J. E., and Kidd, C.: Comparison of near-real-time precipitation estimates from satellite observations and numerical models, B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 88, 47–64, 2007.

Fritz, S. and Laszlo, I.: Detection of water vapor in the stratosphere over very high clouds in the tropics, Journal of Geophysical Research, 98(D12), 22 959–22 967, 1993.

Früh, B., Bendix, J., Nauss, T., Paulat, M., Pfeiffer, A., Schipper, J. W., Thies, B., and Wernli, H.: Verification of precipitation from regional climate simulations and remote-sensing observations with respect to ground-based observations in the upper Danube catchment, Meteorologische Zeitschrift, 16, 275–293, 2007.

Houze, R. A.: Cloud Dynamics, Vol 53 of the International Geophysics Series, Academic Press, San Diego, 1993.

Key, J.: Streamer User's Guide, Cooperative Institute for Meteorological Satellite Studies, University of Wisconsin, 2001.

Key, J. and Schweiger, A.J.: Tools for atmospheric radiative transfer: Streamer and FluxNet, Computers and Geosciences, 24, 443–451, 1998.

Kleespies, T. J. and McMillin, L. M.: Retrieval of precipitable water from observations in the split window over varying surface temperatures, J. Appl. Meteorol., 29, 851–862, 1990.

Kley, D., Schmeltekopf, A., Kelly, K., Winkler, R., Thompson, T., and McFarland, M.: Transport of water vapour through the tropical tropopause, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 617–624, 1982.

Kurino, T.: A satellite infrared technique for estimating 'deep/shallow' precipitation, Advances in Space Research, 19, 511–514, 1997.

Lang, P.: Niederschlagsquantifizierung auf der Basis von Radardaten, Promet 26, 22–32, 1997.

Levizzani, V.: Satellite rainfall estimations: new perspectives for meteorology and climate from the EURAINSAT project, Ann. Geophys., 46, 363–372, 2003.

Levizzani, V., Schmetz, J., Lutz, H. J., Kerkmann, J., Alberoni, P. P., and Cervino, M.: Precipitation estimations from geostationary orbit and prospects for Meteosat Second Generation, Meteorol. Appl., 8, 23–41, 2001.

Page, W.: NASA experiment on tropospheric-stratospheric water vapour transport in the intertropical convergence zone, Geophys. Res. Lett., 9, 599–624, 1982.

Reudenbach, C., Heinemann, G., Heuel, E., Bendix, J., and Winiger, M.: Investigation of summertime convective rainfall in Western Europe based on a synergy of remote sensing data and numerical models, Meteorol. Atmos. Phys., 76, 23–41, 2001.

Reudenbach, C.: Konvektive Sommerniederschläge in Mitteleuropa. Eine Kombination aus Satellitenfernerkundung und numerischer Modellierung zur automatischen Erfassung mesoskaliger Niederschlagsfelder, Bonner Geographische Abhandlungen, 109, 2003.

Reudenbach, C., Nauss, T., and Bendix, J.: Retrieving precipitation with GOES, Meteosat and Terra/MSG at the tropics and midlatitudes, In: Measuring precipitation form space, edited by: Levizzani, V., Bauer, P., and Turk, F.J., Advances in Global Change Research, 28, 2007.

Schemenauer, R. B. and Isaac, G. A.: The importance of cloud top lifetime in the description of natural cloud characteristics, J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol., 23, 267–279, 1984.

Schmetz, J., Tjemkes, S. A., Gube, M., and van de Berg, L.: Monitoring deep convection and convective overshooting with Meteosat, Adv. Space Res., 19, 433–441, 1997.

Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkmann, J., Rota, S., and Ratier, A.: An introduction to Meteosat Second Generation (MSG), B. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 83, 977–992, 2002.

Seltmann, J.: Radarforschung im DWD: Vom Scan zum Produkt., Promet 26, 32–52, 1997.

Stanski, H. R., Wilson, L., and Burrows, W.: Survey of common verification methods in meteorology, World Weather Watch Technical Report No 8, WMO, Geneva, WMO/TD No 358, 1989.

Thies, B., Nauss, T., and Bendix, J.: Discriminating raining from non-raining cloud areas at mid-latitudes using Meteosat Second Generation SEVIRI nighttime data, Meteorol. Appl., in press, 2008.

Tjemkes, S. A., van de Berg, L., and Schmetz, J.: Warm water vapour pixels over high clouds as observed by Meteosat, Contributions to atmospheric physics, 70, 15–21, 1997.

World Weather Research Program/Working Group on Numerical Experimentation Joint Working Group on Verification (WWRP/WGNE): Forecast Verification - Issues, Methods and FAQ, available online at http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/wefor/staff/eee/verif/ verif_web_page.html, 11~October~2007.

Zhang, G., Xu, L., and Hongbin, C.: A new parameterization scheme for short-wave radiative properties of water clouds, J. Appl. Meteorol., 34, 101–106, 1995.